Another example of the failure of the District Government to be "world class" is the demolition of a house next to the entry of a park in the Palisades neighborhood. This house could have been renovated and occupied by a tax paying family. Instead it was demolished... illegally by a District Government agency, an agency that failed to adhere to other laws enforced for other DC Government agencies...
But I digress, MSN has a feature, "Houses on the move: What does it take to relocate a house?," on moving houses rather than demolishing them. Now, I think that the house on Sherrier Place didn't need to move. There wasn't really a need for a more grand entrance into the park, show that it's a neighborhood park by integrating it into the neighborhood, rather than fully setting it apart. But I'd rather have had the house be moved than demolished. And the DPR set up a gamed process that led to the house's demolition, rather than fairly, openly, and transparently considering other options.
According to the MSN feature:
Each house saved diverts 50,000 to 100,000 pounds of debris from landfills.
Not to mention the embodied energy lost.
So the DC Government says it wants to be considered a world leader on environmental issues?
Right here, in one decision, probably 10 to 20 other "pro-environmental" actions were likely obviated, reversed.
Also see "Why build? Move an older house instead" from MSN.
Movers guide a truck and house through a tight passage with overhanging trees in Seattle's Queen Anne neighborhood. They had to temporarily move high-voltage, high-tension overhead trolley lines -- at a cost of roughly $30,000 -- to relocate it just 10 blocks from its original site. Photo by Jeff McCord.
No comments:
Post a Comment