I'm finally learning not to prognosticate too much.
Virginia. It's nice to see Democrats pick up the State House in Virginia and keep the Senate. A Republican won the governorship in 2021 and that was a shock although Ralph Youngkin ran a better campaign than former Governor Terry McAuliffe along with lower Democratic turnout. In the 2017 and 2019 elections, I thought Democratic wins in Virginia presaged a lot more. While Biden won in 2020, the rest of the ballot didn't do so well for Democrats.
Youngkin was a big time private equity guy before his election, like Mitt Romney. Youngkin's "compassionate MAGA" (as opposed to GWB's compassionate conservatism) went over well with pundits and donors--many of whom touted him as a potentially late entrant Republican alternative to Trump. The election results seem to reduce that likelihood significantly.
Richmond, Virginia. The casino referendum lost again, even though it had the support of most elected officials and stakeholders like unions and the NAACP ("Richmond voters reject a casino for the second time," NBC12).
While I tend to be against casinos, maybe one in Richmond would be okay, because of Virginia's "weird" separation of cities and counties financially, and Richmond needs a big money push as it has lots of needs, and lacks access to the funds of a county. Too bad Richmond and Henrico and Chesterfield Counties can't merge.
I haven't been to Baltimore lately, but in a comment on an article I said the area around football stadiums tend to be bad, and someone countered "not Baltimore" with a casino and now additional attractions. Maybe for secondary cities like Baltimore and Richmond, casinos, in some situations, are acceptable. But probably better located places, unlike say Springfield, Massachusetts.
Seattle. Over the past 8 years, Seattle has elected lots of supra progressive politicians. Two elections ago, business interests pumped in lots of money especially against Kshama Sawant who led the drive to tax big corporations, which eventually was passed, the Socialist Alternative representative, and made little headway, progressives ruled. Last election after the debacle of CHOP/CHAZ, a more center candidate won as Mayor and a more law and order type as district attorney.
This year with the continued public safety problems and the slow return of office workers to Seattle's Downtown which has had significant negative impact with lots of retail closures including a signature grocery store, and other retailers leaving the city allegedly because of crime, some of the more progressive councilmembers decamped, and it appears that a bunch of the more progressive candidates will lose--although this isn't assured as late ballots still to be counted tend to run more progressive ("Seattle is the most progressive city no more," Seattle Times).
Pennsylvania. This year elected lots of Democrats to positions in Philadelphia suburbs and the city--where Working Families Party knocked off a couple of Republicans. Philadelphia, like DC, reserves a couple of seats for non-Dominant parties. In Democratic places, that's presumed to be Republicans, although in DCnow it's fake Democrats, Democrats who call themselves independents. I'd rather it be Working Families. A Democrat won Allegheny County (Pittsburgh) Executive, although I think Pittsburgh and the County should merge. And for the Pennsylvania Supreme Court too.
-- "Pennsylvania’s blue wave offers Democrats hope for 2024," Philadelphia Inquirer
Andy Beshear was re-elected Governor in Kentucky, a red state, although Republicans won the Governorship in Mississippi--not really a surprise although he faced some difficulties, and a couple weeks ago in Louisiana. And the referendum putting abortion as a right in the Ohio Constitution won, which the Republicans opposed.
Transportation. There were a few initiatives. This year, not just yesterday (just like the Louisiana electtion was not yesterday). The big push will be next year.
Trump versus Biden poll. These wins make me feel better about the recent polls that Trump is leading Biden in swing states. It's a year to the election and apparently a lot of people haven't been paying attention or they are closet authoritarians.
-- "Republicans closely resemble autocratic parties in Hungary and Turkey – study," Guardian
-- "Study: Republican control of state government is bad for democracy," Vox
Biden and the economy. OTOH, food prices remain high, as do gas prices, although the latter are starting to drop, and I think that influences people a lot, as well as all the news coverage on Biden's age, and the purported recession that doesn't exist.
Of course, the Federal Reserve's raising of interest rates has had a huge impact on the real estate market--residential mortgage rates have doubled and housing sales lag significantly. And the commercial real estate market is tanking because of work from home, but the CRE market likely isn't top of mind the way housing sales are.
Conclusion. In blue and "mixed" states, governance matters. In some red states, governance doesn't matter so much, but women's rights do.
https://apnews.com/article/school-board-elections-moms-liberty-progressives-1e439de49b0e8498537484fb031f66a6
ReplyDeletehttps://www.npr.org/2023/11/11/1212185489/election-pennsylvania-school-board
ReplyDeleteSending out tax refund checks just a day or two prior to election day, with a reference by name to the (VA) Governor, appears to not have worked.
ReplyDeleteFortunately! Remember one of the covid checks from the federal government, Trump did the same. Also there was supposed to be a letter acknowledging him in food packages that were distributed during covid.
ReplyDeleteAs bad as Youngkin may be, at least he didn't indirectly kill hundreds of thousands.
Just interesting that a year after a giant infrastructure stimulus program (2022) none of the elections really dealt with it.
ReplyDeletehttps://policytensor.substack.com/p/notes-on-us-china-policy
Maybe too much of a 30,000 foot view, but just interesting that these big economic issues (infrastructure / climate adaptation. fiscal deficit) aren't part of the discourse, and the general anti-china mood is very bipartisan.
Youngkin did two interesting economic developments moves -- killed a proposed ford plant because of its use of chinese technology, and apparently did not push the FBI springfield site because it involved government workers, which are not as scalable in economic development. Ie have the HQ in Maryland and the majority of workers will still live in VA.
I think too that the Biden Administration, despite the superiority of the Springfield location from an agglomeration standpoint, wasn't gonna give Youngkin a win on this. And I don't blame them.
ReplyDeleteMore to read... thanks.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/11/3-reasons-bidens-strong-economy-is-unpopular.html
ReplyDelete"3 Reasons Biden’s Strong Economy Is Unpopular"
Says the same stuff. Rising food and other consumer prices. Interests rates. Also fall off in income and savings as the infrastructure bill effects wane on individual households.
As seen as twitter yesterday, "Biden economics" has been great for the bottom 10% of income earners -- lots of government benefits and increased wages.
ReplyDeleteBut for the median worker, basically no income increases and higher expenses.
At the top 90% of income, again no income gains but you have wealth gains from increased price of housing and investments.
also this:
https://on.ft.com/3sEcNiT
"Claudia Sahm: ‘We do not need a recession, but we may get one’" FT
Majority of moderates on the Seattle City Council.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/tuesday-count-keeps-seattle-council-races-close-though-few-ballots-remain
I miss reading the FT. Thank you for that. Makes you realize how complex it is getting right the macroeconomy.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/nov/21/moms-for-liberty-school-board-elections
ReplyDeleteThe Moms for Liberty platform is extreme – and most voters are loudly rejecting it
Off-year elections, like the ones that took place earlier this month, can fall under the radar – or at least, that’s what far-right reactionary groups like Moms for Liberty and the 1776 Project might have been hoping. Organizations like these spent the better part of this year pushing to elect school board members who would enact a rightwing agenda in the name of “abolishing critical race theory”.
But, for the most part, they failed. Per the American Federation of Teachers, groups like these lost close to 70% of the races where they made endorsements this November. And while conservatives made some inroads in places like the Houston suburbs, they fell short in some of the most high-profile races in swing states, like Pennsylvania – where Democrats swept several school boards while rejecting the culture war – as well as Iowa, Ohio and Virginia.
Moms for Liberty is part of a long history of rightwing mothers’ activism in the US
The failure of rightwing ideologues to take over local school boards shows that voters simply don’t want to buy what they’re selling.
... So why did they perform so poorly? For one thing, the Moms for Liberty agenda was simply too extreme for most voters outside of the deepest-red districts. National polling from earlier this year found that the majority of Americans oppose book bans, trust teachers to make curricular decisions, and think schools should teach the history of slavery, racism and segregation.