Urbanity and weddings/engagement photos
Streetsblog has a funny piece, "Here’s Why No One Shoots Engagement Photos in the Suburbs." The headline is self-explanatory.
This comes to mind because on Friday, I shot this photo at Union Square in New York City. There is a restaurant facility there--using a building that had once been a parks department office--which can also be rented for special events.
I framed the photo so you can't see the cacophony of the Greenmarket in what would be the foreground.
As Adrian Benepe, former parks commissioner in NYC, said: such a facility brings more activity to the park, provides jobs, etc.
I guess it's customary for some wedding parties to go around DC and have photos taken in front of various monuments.
I got this photo a number of years ago in the vicinity of the US Capitol--a party preparing for their photo. I had somewhere to go, so I didn't follow them to their final photo.
2 Comments:
I guess when you have DC as a potential backdrop that kind of makes sense. But all the wedding photos from the last wedding I went to in DC were taken in the suburbs. Admittedly that location was River Farm. Previous examples have been at suburban parks. It's a lot of extra work and cost to get a wedding party to a a monumental location. The big location in NYC is Brooklyn Bridge Park but the views are stunning.
Well dear, My parents have booked one of the best Chicago Wedding Venues for my wedding party. And, It reminds me that how much fun we had. It was an amazing feeling when I saw my parents and friends enjoying the wedding party.
Post a Comment
<< Home