A good as way as any to get conservatives to drive electric cars
In general, conservatives don't believe in climate change and advocate for fossil fuels. Koch Industries, a big oil producer, fund a variety of efforts to fight policies that promote alternatives to oil and natural gas ("Group tells minorities, ‘We need fossil fuels’," Energy and Engineering News). Conservatives have come out against tax incentives for electric battery plants in Georgia ("Georgia judge nixes tax break for electric truck firm Rivian," AP), and for wind and solar installations, neglecting to acknowledge tax benefits given to oil production, etc.
Technically, electric cars still use fossil fuels primarily, but this is changing as wind and solar power make up a greater proportion of the energy mix.
That being said, an electric car is better than an internal combustion engine powered motor vehicle, but it's still a car, and sustainable modes--walking, biking, transit--are still better than an automobility dependent paradigm.
I call it "next generation asphalt nation."
Although long term, switching to electric vehicles does reduce the nation's dependence on oil, and that has a number of domestic and foreign policy benefits ("Oil dependence | The US as a Petro-state and gasoholic | and war").
That being said Elon Musk's pro-conservative trolling on Twitter is turning off liberals and engaging conservatives, so much to the point that they are becoming interested in driving Teslas ("'Tesla is becoming a partisan brand, says survey'," Electrek).
Tesla’s net favorability among self-described Democrats in the U.S. fell to an average of 10.4% this month through Nov. 27, down from an average of 24.8% in October, according to Morning Consult. It rose to 26.5% from 20% among self-described Republicans during the same period.
Maybe he's playing the long con. How will the Kochs and other pro-fossil fuel interests respond?
And the plus for liberals is that there are an increasingly number of electric cars from other manufacturers, manufactured better and often less expensive ("Tesla Is No Longer Alone in the Electric Vehicle Race," TIME).
====
-- "Electric bicycles as a quantum opportunity for transportational cycling: can e bikes be conquest sales versus cars?," 2022
-- "Revisiting the 2016 entry, "Ford Motor Company as a transportation company not a "car" company: bike share and small scale transit"," 2021 (specifically the section "I was wrong about Tesla")
Labels: car culture and automobility, electric vehicles/EVs, gasoline, green-environment-urban
6 Comments:
https://www.dailykos.com/story/2022/12/13/2141585/-Elon-Musk-is-about-to-learn-that-liberals-not-his-new-deplorable-pals-buy-Teslas
The other solution for the equation is Musk just want to be the center of conversation.
Better him than trump. We had a constitution to prevent immigrants from becoming president.
I sent in a witty comment but it didn't make it. I'll try to recreate.
1) https://popehat.substack.com/p/goodbye-twitter
I get it that nobody wants to be put into context, but this isn't just a twitter problem.
2) "Electric car costs draw level with petrol and diesel " from the FT. I am running low of links so I'll just say that I doubt this. Based on old data, I think over the summer electric prices for cars rose to gas prices. And not sure if it includes road tax.
https://www.ft.com/content/24ae34f9-2d61-45cb-9bbc-158c2e5e26b3
"Rising fuel prices this year mean that the cost of owning and running an electric car is now lower than petrol or diesel in almost every country in Europe, according to data from automotive lease provider LeasePlan."
3) also from FT:
"Electric car battery prices rise for first time in more than a decade"
https://www.ft.com/content/f6c409d3-a29b-48f8-9f17-5586a1963d16
The price of lithium-ion batteries rose for the first time in more than a decade this year, with surging raw material costs expected to challenge the car industry’s efforts to turn electric vehicles into a mass-market product.
4) david zipper noticing that electric cars are getting VERY heavy and very expensive.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2022-12-13/make-room-for-minicars-the-electric-vehicles-cities-need?sref=4NgeXq8Q
Again he's functionally insane if he thinks Americans will take to golf carts. But outside regulations the price/weight pressures will continue.
5) https://www.worksinprogress.co/issue/energy-and-abundance/
Much longer piece on energy density.
6)https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/ford-f150-lightning-electric-truck-towing-test/
...Before you hitch an Airstream to your electric truck and set out to circumnavigate the country, you need to understand this: With the largest available battery pack, a fully charged 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning electric truck has less energy onboard than a regular F-150 with four gallons of gas in its tank...
Personally, I was pretty staggered about my own electric scooter in the winter. My usual 4 mile trip on it would in summer leave me with 75% battery left. In winter it would not make it home (less than 5% battery). And by winter I mean DC winter at 40 degrees.
Merry christmas, appreciate the postings.
offtopic:
https://on.ft.com/3Vc5mrv
(green buildings)
"The great green office crunch
New environmental regulations are being applied to commercial real estate still reeling from the pandemic. Will they lead to zombie buildings?"
One more barrier to central business district revival. Thx for this. Great article.
I remember post crash when Harriet Tregoning touted how awesome DC was for having the most LEED buildings. I said it was the outcome of being one of the only markets experiencing commercial construction.
I am at a loss for how to revive center cities. I'm all about concentration, critical mass, "centralization." Wfh completely upended that. Cbd concentration is the only centralizing development force in the US where all the other forces promote deconcentration.
I mentioned my next door neighbor works for a global insurance company renting four floors in a prominent office building downtown. Since covid they've all been wfh. Still. Multiply that by many tens of thousands of firms.
I am thinking the major cities may get some benefit. Eg article in the Sun about a jewelry firm moving to NYC (Dutch company, first in Columbia, then moved to Baltimore).
Second and third tier cities may get boxed out. At the same time there is a reordering g of the tiers in a manner that favors places like Texas and Georgia.
I'm sure you have followed this:
https://www.kastle.com/safety-wellness/getting-america-back-to-work/
castle is the key card entry people.
WFH / 3 day work weeks are the last official pandemic policy left in place. And honestly, causing a lot more disruption than people want to admit.
I realize most of white collar america likes the 3 day work week, but you need to adjust their wages to match it.
Word. If I recall, your firm is wfh now. How do they know you're all working when you should be? When you mentioned it, thongs were fine. There probably are a lot of jobs that can be performed offsite, even if there are a lot that can't?
Post a Comment
<< Home