An illustration of house transmogrification that is a neighborhood character deadener

 

Decades ago I was at one of my first conferences, and a speaker made the point that the primary reason that people oppose development is because the new is generally worse than the old.  And that in past eras, when something old was replaced, it was more likely to be better.

After 25 years of experience, I'd say that the speaker is right in terms of attitudes but wrong in practice, because most people oppose everything regardless of design and building material quality.

But there is no question that design and building material quality "stick out" positively and will last decades, contributing positively to the "architecture of the ensemble."

The building facade on the left diminishes the ensemble.

2.  While people "oppose everything" they always advocate "for parks." That's because they want placid spaces.  The default after "no development" is "park/greenspace", not development.

But what if we open pickleball courts instead ("Shattered Nerves, Sleepless Nights: Pickleball Noise Is Driving Everyone Nuts," New York Times).

Given various experiences in DC, I always recommend against tearing down a development, and while the process to build something new goes forward, creating a "temporary use of a park." By the time the project is ready to get its approvals and permits, any agreement about temporary use goes out the window.  The park created an advocacy group by existing, and they will fight the next phase of the project ("Park View Residents Continue To Oppose Redevelopment at Bruce Monroe Park," Washington City Paper).

This happened with the Capital Crescent Trail and the Purple Line light rail project in Suburban Montgomery County.  The railroad there was used to shuttle coal to a power plant in Georgetown DC.  That facility closed in 1987.  The County stepped in and bought the line, "banking it for future transit" while putting in a multi use path, the CCT, in the interim.

Note the shirt.

Caption: President of the Capital Crescent Trail Ajay Bhatt speaks during a final walk at the Georgetown Branch trail, which will close due to construction of the Purple Line. Mike Murillo/WTOP.

Well in the mid 2010s, people fought the Purple Line, ostensibly because of the Trail but really because they didn't want to give up what had become extended backyards ("Friends of Capital Crescent Trail Take Purple Line Fight to U.S. Transportation Secretary," Bethesda Magazine, "Purple Line opponents hope for last-minute stop to Montgomery Co. trail closure," WTOP Radio).  

The service will open in 2027, so 40 years after the concept was first developed. Construction and other delays created by Republican Governor Larry Hogan delayed the project by 5.5 years ("The last bit of track, finally, is laid for the Purple Line," Washington Post).

FWIW, a memo I wrote about creating an "irresistible biking environment for DC" was distributed to the Maryland State Highway planning staff when I was a bike planner in Baltimore County, during the beginnings of planning for the Purple Line.  It influenced their making a commitment to have a trail parallel the entire line.