Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space

"A community’s physical form, rather than its land uses, is its most intrinsic and enduring characteristic." [Katz, EPA] This blog focuses on place and placemaking and all that makes it work--historic preservation, urban design, transportation, asset-based community development, arts & cultural development, commercial district revitalization, tourism & destination development, and quality of life advocacy--along with doses of civic engagement and good governance watchdogging.

Wednesday, October 24, 2018

The nature of DC's federally-related "business" is coordination, not doing

On Monday, the Washington Post ran a story, "Why a Silicon Valley venture fund thinks Baltimore can be an East Coast tech hub," about how Baltimore's Port Covington development is landing DataTribe, a leading cybersecurity business incubator, as an anchor tenant.  Alongside the incubator is its relationship with a major venture capital firm, Allegis Capital, which has a specialty in the cyber security sector also.

The article makes the point that this will put the Baltimore area -- which also is closer to Fort Meade, where the National Security Agency is based -- ahead of the DC area in terms of reaping the benefits from this business sector in terms of business development and employment.

The article ends with a discussion of the study of the cyber security sector in the DC area, how there are 800 companies involved, but few are based in DC proper.  From the article:
A 2017 study of D.C.-area cybersecurity businesses by Amplifier Ventures and the Kogod School of Business at American University found more than 800 companies engaged in cybersecurity work but noted that about 95 percent of them are focused on government services. The study noted a “profound lack” of cybersecurity companies building cybersecurity products for the commercial business world.

But the District has largely failed to harness those assets. With a few notable exceptions — such as a D.C.-based encryption start-up called Virtru that has raised $76.8 million from investors — there are few sizable cybersecurity companies working within the District.

“D.C.’s infrastructure is really good for government and government services, but that’s not what we’re building here,” Ackerman said. “If you go out to Silicon Valley, it could not be any more different than what you find in downtown Washington, D.C.”
This reminds me of something that I wrote more than 6 years ago, when the Gray Administration suggested that DC could reap the benefits of the IT and software required to implement "Obamacare."

I made the point that it isn't about letting the contracts to do it--which is what the Department of Health and Human Services (in this case the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which is based in Baltimore County)--it's about having the expertise in software development around health care, having highly rated computer science and engineering programs at local universities, etc.

It's tough for DC proper to develop strength in IT and software development outside of "coordination of business activities" because the actual doing of whatever form of exchange is underway, tends to occur elsewhere.

Federal laboratories versus federal agencies. By contrast, the federal government supports many research laboratories mostly across the country, but some in the DC area.  These agencies tend to be much more successful in developing new technologies, although frequently they are more focused on discovery and hand off implementation to others.

DC area examples include primarilyr the National Institutes of Health in Montgomery County, but also an agriculture research facility in Beltsville, Maryland and the National Institute for Science and Technology also in Montgomery County.

-- "A follow up example with regard to Metropolitan Revolutions: the National Science Foundation moving to Alexandria," 2013

New York City. NYC's not having the equivalent kind of software and data science expertise comparable to that of Boston-Cambridge in Harvard and MIT, the Silicon Valley in Stanford University, and the Austin area with the University of Texas is what led then Mayor Bloomberg to put out an RFP to create such an institution in NYC to anchor these sectors ("New York's Silicon Alley Is (Still) No Match for Silicon Valley," Businessweek/).

The winner was a joint venture of Cornell University and Israel's Technion Institute of Technology ("Cornell Tech officially opens campus on New York City's Roosevelt Island," Inside Higher Education).
.
Incubators are the primary tool, but aren't always enough. Most cities are content to act in developing IT/software business activities by creating or supporting incubators although in DC that hasn't totally worked out ("The Sad Story of How a DC Tech Incubator Fell Apart," Washingtonian).

But the same goes for large scale Maker Spaces more generally (TechShop's Crystal City makerspace closes as company shuts down," Technical.ly).  Others have failed in Brooklyn and Philadelphia.

Higher education efforts.  Some higher education efforts, but not on the scale of New York City, are focused on bolstering higher education efforts, recognizing how universities in Boston's Route 128 corridor and in the Silicon Valley for technology, and in Cambridge for biotechnology, have been key (see Saxenian's discussion of IT and clustering in Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128).

One interesting effort is in San Antonio, where the University of Texas San Antonio is building a downtown campus, not just for the College of Business, but also a new School of Data Science ("UTSA plans downtown growth on city and county land," San Antonio Express-News). From the article:
The parcels belonging to the city will become the locations of the university’s $33 million National Security Collaboration Center and $57 million School of Data Science. The UT System Board of Regents committed $70 million from the state’s Permanent University Fund at its Sept. 6 meeting for both projects.

Businessman Graham Weston, meanwhile, has pledged $15 million toward the School of Data Science, his largest one-time personal donation to a single project and the university’s largest-ever cash gift, Eighmy said. ...

Companies have been forced to leave San Antonio because they couldn’t recruit qualified local employees, said Weston, who has been devoted to building a technology hub in San Antonio and rehabilitating downtown.

Programs like UTSA’s are crucial for that development because they strengthen the pipeline from college to the workforce, he said. ...

The city, county and university leaders also pointed to a downtown transformation in Phoenix after Arizona State University created a new campus downtown. It drew more than 10,000 students, reinvigorated a sleepy downtown and contributed to sales tax revenue growth. ...

UTSA has been working to make the downtown campus more optimal for students to complete their coursework without having to go to the main campus about 20 miles northwest, just inside Loop 1604. This year’s incoming students in the university’s colleges of public policy and architecture, construction and planning can fulfill degree requirements entirely downtown, university officials have said.
San Antonio's Brooks City Base.  Elsewhere in San Antonio is the effort to reshape the decommissioned Brooks Air Force Base as a science and technology center ("Brooks City Base enlists development partner, kicks off plans for 75-acre industrial park," San Antonio Business Journal), including a new medical school and other health science schools of the University of Incarnate Word.  They just landed a US headquarters for a European firm which will bring more than 1,000 jobs ("San Antonio getting U.S. headquarters for European company, bringing 1,400 jobs," San Antonio Express-News).

Another is how the Joint School of Nanoscience and Nanoengineering in Greensboro, North Carolina is a joint venture between the University of North Carolina campus and North Carolina A&T, and the school anchors a research park ("Scientists at the Joint School of Nanoscience and Nanoengineering look for future technological marvels," Winston-Salem Journal).

Baltimore does have the advantage of proximity to Fort Meade.  Even so, it ought to look at expanding the curriculum at the University of Maryland at Baltimore, which currently is focused on the medical sciences, into the computing science and engineering arena as well, to bolster and extend its current recent success.

Note that Northern Virginia's different in terms of its place in the military/cyber economy because they've had more direct IT/software connections with different military units including the Defense Advance Research Projects Agency ("Montgomery County's real economic development problem: it's not part of the military economy," 2011) and the military's need for high speed IT connections.

Note that more than 20 years ago, Virginia developed the Center for Innovative Technology in the Dulles Corridor as a way to extend its place in the cyber economy ("Dulles trapezoid could be anchor for development," Washington Post), given that it was much stronger in other places (Boston-Cambridge, Silicon Valley, Austin/Texas) elsewhere in the United States.

CIT.

Even so, Loudoun County is pretty far from the center of the region and CIT seems to not be enough to lure Amazon's HQ2 that far out as it appears that Crystal City in Arlington County is much better positioned ("Amazon HQ2 Watch: Northern Virginia Checks the Most Boxes," New York Times).

Interesting with Crystal City is the "naturally occurring research park" on the Wilson Boulevard corridor, although it is anchored by the National Science Foundation, which is moving to Alexandria.

I have written in the past that DC has the building blocks for this kind of development, but that the talent and resources of the city's resident universities are dis-coordinated and unrealized.

-- "Better leveraging higher education institutions in cities and counties: Greensboro; Spokane; Mesa; Phoenix; Montgomery County, Maryland; Washington, DC," 2016
-- "Naturally occurring innovation districts | Technology districts and the tech sector," 2014

This is another example.

DC does have assets.  Note that DC has higher education assets that can be leveraged--medical schools at Georgetown, GWU, and Howard University; schools of engineering at Howard, Catholic University, and GWU (although most of that school is at a satellite suburban campus in Virginia) , a library science school at Catholic--many such schools such at at UC Berkeley and the University of Michigan have been transformed into combo library, information science, data science, programs in nursing and health fields at many of the schools, etc.

Meanwhile, for a couple decades, Catholic University has talked about creating a research park adjacent to their campus.

This piece discusses how to create such an initiative around biotechnology:

-- "Ordinary versus Extraordinary Planning around the rebuilding of the United Medical Center in Southeast Washington DC | Part Two: Creating a graduate health and biotechnology research initiative on the St. Elizabeths campus," 2018

Labels: , , ,

9 Comments:

At 8:48 AM, Anonymous charlie said...

Again, with biotech I am not sure that anyone outside of San Diego, SFBay, and Boston has a chance.

On NOVA as a "Cyber" hub, which sounds very dated, it was a combination of the enormous AOL money back in the day as well as early leadership of Nextel and internet companies. The legacy still exists as data centers. My theory on Amazon HQ2 is 1) Bezos is having a mid life crisis and wants away from wifey and 2) they know that AWS is the future and that the best place to base that is in DC.


On cybersecurity, my only observation is people interested in cybersecurity seem to be very anti-urban and like to live in Howard county or someplace safe.

I do have a friend who moved North of H st back when you did. I asked him about it. He liked then real estate appreciation but I was hesitant on crime. He explained he did counter insurgency and carefully explained to every young man that he loved the area and was glad to be here and not killing people for a living anymore. Green berets.

 
At 10:45 AM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

The thing with biotech is that you can be a secondary center and still do ok. It takes awhile to build that up, but that is the case. At least I think so, we've seen that with IT.

E.g., Florida's whole argument was based on him seeing startups in Pittsburgh leave eventually. That's because the ecosystem there was underdeveloped.

But over time it developed enough that it could keep firms. It isn't gonna be Silicon Valley, but it can do reasonably well. And of course now, like with the AV stuff, it's getting direct investment from Silicon Valley.

But that happened after he left for Toronto. His argument was an instance of timing/his moment in time.

But yes, Phoenix, NYC, KC, DC etc. are not going to outspan Cambridge, SF, and San Diego in biotech. Ever.

2. DK about Bezos' situation but obviously you're right about AWS. I didn't want to belabor that area in what I wrote and I skipped some stuff in this piece, but have written about it before.

I think you're forgetting a step.

AOL and MCI leeched off the DoD backbone. But the DoD backbone was first. Other businesses developed off AOL and MCI. And the whole data center business is a separate thread. + DARPA.

Back in the early 1990s when I was trying to do computer related tv there was a guy Mario Morino, trying to do the same kind of agglomeration support development in the area. Obviously, even back then military-related stuff was key. Morino moved on, to Cleveland I believe. He got tired.

- https://philanthropynewsdigest.org/news/morino-institute-releases-new-report-on-the-status-of-venture-philanthropy, c. 2001

But here is like what happened in PGH. I too believed in cluster superiority at one time. The main clusters still end up being superior, but over time it is possible to develop secondary clusters.

It's faster if you facilitate it right with higher education institutions and support organizations. Getting venture capital is tough. Etc.

But DC not understanding its place in the ecosystem and where it needed to be focused to change has kept DC, for the most part out of the picture.

There is some effort in higher education (remember Blackboard) and stuff supporting nonprofits. But business development in other sectors is less the case.

E.g., more than a decade ago but I can never find the cite, I remember reading an obituary of a CUA engineering professor. He started some businesses, but not in DC. He based them in Columbia, Maryland, where he lived.

DC's not capturing this kind of business.

Creating a research park at St. Es could help. Along with my proposal etc. It could be done with CUA and Walter Reed as I wrote in the 2013 piece.

3. With cybersecurity and location preference, they are military types, and yes, seem to be suburban oriented. Hence Loudoun, Ft. Meade, Howard County, etc. as you mentioned.

4. WRT H St., my joke is that I was young and dumb. Had I been able to read Elijah Anderson's _Streetwise_ and _Code of the Street_ beforehand I would have been much better prepared, even without having been taught how to kill...

 
At 10:46 AM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

I "found" that Corvair...

https://www.flickr.com/photos/rllayman/45456940162

https://www.flickr.com/photos/rllayman/31634860318

 
At 10:52 AM, Anonymous charlie said...

Yes, I remember Mario. I think he developed cancer as well and went back to Cleveland.

And yes -- that is the back story on DOD and the the internet.

Post 2001, very little activity in that area outside of data centers. A few survivors (Cvent, finally did an IPO in 2014 or so then got bought out).







 
At 11:18 AM, Anonymous charlie said...

http://www.curbsideclassic.com/automotive-histories/automotive-history-how-the-1960-corvair-started-a-global-design-revolution/

 
At 11:19 AM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

The dot.com blowup circa 2001 and the failure of area companies, WorldCom especially, + the move of Verizon from Arlington to New York really hurt the development and stability of the ecosystem.

And AOL being outspanned by the web browser itself.

 
At 12:42 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

a couple years ago, we went to the June open house of the Museum of the Shenandoah Valley. One of the activities was a classic car show. It was cool. A lot of Studebakers and Packards and others. The Fiat 1800 photo reminds me of the Studebaker Hawks.

... anyway, I've written that what happened with the car market is that exogenous conditions changed to favor the way Europeans made/designed cars (smaller and with a different design sensibility) and that caught the US companies flat footed (plus a different business model from the US, basically a health insurance and pension company building cars).

So now I see that some of this comes from the Pininfarina legacy. But I also think it reflects other design traditions in Europe. I really felt that way with the modern architecture in Germany. It seemed to have a real sense of terroir there that I don't often feel here.

=====
and I learned about Panhard, Bertone, and NSU. Thanks.

 
At 9:07 AM, Anonymous charlie said...

Also this:

https://www.lrb.co.uk/v40/n20/simon-wren-lewis/bait-and-switch

I'm working my way through the book and oddly not liking it. I agree he does a better job of the non-American story, but is also missing a lot (The pivot to austerity in the US in 09 was also about cleaning up the books to get healthcare reform passed). Also he isn't really looking at the real problem which is the recovery is historically weak -- which I'd argue is from larger failures in the eurodollar system rather than a failure of stimulus.


 
At 2:42 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

Hmm. this is a bit out of my capacity macro-wise. I saw the mention in the blog...

Isn't the weak recovery in Europe in large part because of austerity in places like the UK, and depression in countries like Greece and Spain, and total wreckage in the banking sector in some countries like Iceland, but also some firms in the large countries too like the UK.

How do the eurodollar system issues overlay that? And rather than eurodollar, the problem is the eurozone? Or an additional and equally serious problem is the eurozone?

You're probably right a bit about US austerity, but even so, there was a lot more could be done when finance costs were so low in terms of infrastructure.

Been thinking about Obama's HSR push and thinking in retrospect that like the MetroExpress, maybe it would have been a lot better to focus on various railroad and subway and light rail extensions and improvements rather than the go for broke on HSR, which was easy for the opposition to break against.

The other thing I've been thinking about is Oberstar's Nonmotorized Transpo pilot project, which was really a way to give $ to Minneapolis-St. Paul for biking and walking.

We need a city in the US with a tram based transit system, functioning at the level of a Melbourne or Zurich, to act as the Positive Deviance model for the rest of the country.

DC could actually do that. Overlay a streetcar system and get rid of most of the buses. Give transit priority. etc.

====
I have too many urbanism books to try to work through for economics. Plus "old" urbanism books too.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home