Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space

"A community’s physical form, rather than its land uses, is its most intrinsic and enduring characteristic." [Katz, EPA] This blog focuses on place and placemaking and all that makes it work--historic preservation, urban design, transportation, asset-based community development, arts & cultural development, commercial district revitalization, tourism & destination development, and quality of life advocacy--along with doses of civic engagement and good governance watchdogging.

Friday, April 22, 2022

Earth Day, Saturday April 23rd

 Some communities create an Earth Week or Earth Month, not just an Earth Day.

In the DC area, one of my favorite activities is the GreenFest sponsored by Montgomery County, Maryland and this year held at Brookside Gardens.  It's a model for something I want to try to create here in Salt Lake, hopefully as soon as next year, in conjunction with my participation as a board member of Sugar House Park.

Oil dependence and transit.  WRT Earth Day issues, given the rise in oil prices as a result of uncertainty in the market created by Russia's invasion of Ukraine, there have been various articles with suggestions on what to do.  Interestingly, the International Energy Agency suggests consuming less (A 10-Point Plan to Cut Oil Use).

By contrast the Washington Post editorialized for more production ("Another energy crisis is here. The U.S. must be realistic about what’s next."), albeit for other steps as well.

-- "Oil dependence | The US as a Petro-state and gasoholic | and war," 2022

And while some states and legislators are calling for a gas tax holiday ("As states consider gas tax holidays, don't expect big savings," CNBC), Germany is making public transit practically free, charging €9/month, when a pass for transit in the core of Hamburg is normally €72/month , although they are also reducing gas taxes ("Germany unveils measures to tackle high energy prices," Die Welt).

The reality is that with the sprawl land use paradigm, it's difficult to substitute transit for driving, because it many instances, transit service doesn't measure up--it doesn't go where you need to go at all, or it takes an incredibly long time to get there, plus the distance to the final destination may be considerable.

As blog commenter charlie once said "transit's killer app is saving time and money" (paraphrased).  If it doesn't save time, and in fact costs a lot more time, people won't use it.

Transit also has great opportunity from electrification, as coastal states could generate the bulk of their electricity from off shore wind turbines and tide-based energy generation, and this energy could be used to fuel buses and trains.

2.  Cities aren't necessarily green but they are environmentally superior to suburban sprawl.  Cities use less energy than suburbs, for transport and household fueling, compared to the suburbs, even though they import goods and services, especially food.

This is discussed in the Green Metropolis argument by David Owen, first in an article in the New Yorker, and later in book form.

-- Green Metropolis: Why Living Smaller, Living Closer, And Driving Less Are The Keys To Sustainability

3.  Other environmental issues to think about:

Big Oil obfuscates about climate change.  Not that we should be surprised, but PBS Frontline has a three-part documentary on the subject ("The Guardian: ‘What we now know … they lied’: how big oil companies betrayed us all," Guardian). The first episode ran Tuesday.

Lithium recycling.  "Lithium costs a lot of money—so why aren’t we recycling lithium batteries?," Ars Technica

Household Energy Poverty. "People are struggling to pay their energy bills – here’s a simple idea that could help," Guardian.  Makes an interesting point that you could index the price of household fuels, providing a basic amount for free, and charging more, indexing price, with a rise in consumption.

"Green" Hydrogen as an alternative to gasoline and diesel fuel.  "Forget passenger cars, here’s where hydrogen make sense in transport," Ars Technica.  There's a lot of talk about green hydrogen.  It doesn't make sense for cars, but could for long distance trucking and maybe transit.

Ethanol.  To cut prices, the US has authorized a greater percentage of ethanol in the gasoline mix ("The Biden administration gives a green light to a fuel that could be even dirtier than regular gas," The Verge).  It's also not particularly good for the environment.

In the US, ethanol is made from corn, so it's not particularly energy efficient, and it raises food prices.  But corn and ethanol producers like it and it has led to an increase in incomes for corn farmers.  If the US made ethanol from waste feedstocks like in Brazil, it would be a different story from an efficiency standpoint.  There sugar cane waste is the primary feedstock.

Ethanol production in the US should be ended, but it's ensconced in the political system of the Midwest so it's pretty untouchable ("Stop the ethanol madness," Atlantic).

Parley's Creek in Sugar House Park, Salt Lake City.  Most of Salt Lake's water supply comes from snowmelt runoff from the Wasatch Mountains.

Drought. Moving from DC--tons of rain--to Salt Lake/Utah has really made me see the impact of drought, resulting from less snowfall and rain, which likely is the result of climate change.  

Some communities have stopped issuing building permits because they couldn't guarantee water supply.  Places with high rainfall and water supplies likely will have greater advantages in terms of economic and population growth going forward.

Drought and agriculture.  Over time, just because there is no other choice, water conservation will have to be a significant priority.  Eventually, it will have to include making choices about agriculture in terms of water use.  For example, Utah's greatest consumer of water is agriculture, and their primary crop is alfalfa--feed for animals--that is sold to China.  It doesn't make sense to dedicate most of the state's scarce water resources to China.

Electric cars.  Are about the environment, sort of, but not about "living smaller, living closer, and driving less."  It's a form of what I call "Next Generation Asphalt Nation" (there is a book titled Asphalt Nation by Jane Holtz).

Photo from "Shell to acquire UK’s biggest electric car charging network," The Driven.

Charging points in rowhouse neighborhoods.  But I have to say one issue I haven't thought enough about is that of providing access to high quality, safe charging infrastructure in rowhouse neighborhoods, many of which don't have on-site parking.  

I know London has been installing charging stations on light poles ("Powering ahead: six new ways to charge an electric car," Guardian), but you have to figure a way to move the cars once they are charged, so that others can use them.

The Guardian article also covers hubs in urban parking structures, installing charging infrastructure at the curbside in curbs and in street furniture (Connected Kerb), and in "street cabinets" used by cable television companies.

Hmm, while most communities are eliminating individual parking meters in favor of parking meter pay stations and numbering slots, parking meter infrastructure could be a way to deliver charging points.

Geothermal opportunities in abandoned fossil fuel wells.  Old oil and natural gas wells can be entry points for geothermal energy generation ("Clean energy is buried at the bottom of abandoned oil wells," Vox).

Labels: , , , , ,

4 Comments:

At 12:36 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

Biden gives in to the ethanol con

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/04/16/biden-gives-ethanol-con/

 
At 12:51 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

https://news.yahoo.com/where-recycling-actually-goes-earth-090131553.html

Americans have long been encouraged to reduce, reuse and recycle. But less than 9% of plastic is recycled in the U.S.

 
At 2:19 PM, Anonymous charlie said...

The gasoline price issue is insane.

We've spent 50 years building up a worldwide system of reserves to handle a supply shock. 10% of oil production moving offline can be handled with mild price increases. No question the EU will be hurting the most and you'll see diesel prices are really out of control (more global pricing than gas).

So instead of letting gas run up to 4.5 with some demand destruction, they drain half the strategic oil reserve (BEFORE THE SUMMER WHEN IT WILL BE NEEDED) and then ethanol? Literally takes more energy to make ethanol than to use it.

Zero movement on authorizing pipelines.

Natural gas will be an issue by winter; every ton of spare capacity is being shipped to Europe, coming to cost a fortune to refill for the summer before the winter.

On making transit free, again a complete lack of thinking on how to bring "choice" users over to transit.

Again the Biden people are saying explicitly choice consumer can buy electric cars are use them to push down demand.

Basically if you don't have your own garage, drop dead.

 
At 6:50 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

Well, Denmark and the Netherlands took the oil price shocks of the 1970s as a signal that dependency on automobility and gasoline needed to he reversed and addressed.

The US went in a different direction, on mpg. But ultimately not reducing dependence on the automobile.

I agree with you about the steps. I don't understand that level of price increases. I'd favor some windfall taxes.

Being out here in sprawlville, I think the inertia favoring automobility is so strong. And so few places have decent transit.

(But I was thinking in the places where transit is just average, start making it free as a way to encourage use.)

Wrt natural gas, I'm not looking forward to the next few years. Did see some articles on induction cooktops.

For me if we went all in on offshore wind, we'd probably be good longer term.
But because the pollution paradox/petro state caucus so strong, moving that way seems impossible.

Now should be a national wake up call on energy sourcing, environment effects of fossil fuels anyway and resilience planning, and instead states and Senators are talking tax holidays and expanding ethanol production.

PS Saudi Arabia and UAE snubbing the US is another reason to reduce fossil fuel dependence.

====
You mention pipelines. Is that really an issue? I guess maybe from fracking fields?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home