Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space

"A community’s physical form, rather than its land uses, is its most intrinsic and enduring characteristic." [Katz, EPA] This blog focuses on place and placemaking and all that makes it work--historic preservation, urban design, transportation, asset-based community development, arts & cultural development, commercial district revitalization, tourism & destination development, and quality of life advocacy--along with doses of civic engagement and good governance watchdogging.

Monday, March 28, 2005

Updating my list of the "building blocks" of successful urban revitalization

The introduction to this blog says that historic preservation is a key issue, but I've hardly written about it. The very first entry of this blog is an article I wrote from the Philadelphia Daily News, comparing Washington and Philadelphia. In it I said that successful urban revitalization is based on three factors:

1. A strong employment center at the core.
2. Great public transportation assets and infrastructure.
3. Historic residential building stock.

That article is about 18 months old, and lately I have realized that I was combining two different (but connected) factors into the third point: attractive historic buildings and a pedestrian-centric urban design.

Building Blocks for Successful Urban Revitalization

1. A strong employment center at the core.
2. Great public transportation assets and infrastructure.
3. Pedestrian-scaled streets and blocks AND buildings.
4. Historic residential building stock.

I have been reading Cy Paumier's Creating a Vibrant City Center (at some point I will write an entry or two about it) and he explains succinctly "the new point three" and the historical conditions that brought it about.

Concentration and Intensity of Use: "The intensity of development in the traditional central area was relatively high due to the value of the land. Maximizing site coverage meant building close to the street, which created a strong sense of spatial enclosure. Although city center development was dense, construction practices limited building height and preserved a human scale. The consistency in building height and massing reinforced the pedestrian scale of streets, as well as the city center's architectural harmony and visual coherence." (p. 11)

rows01Photo from BeyondDC website, which has a number of photo galleries of DC (and other city) neighborhoods. This photo is from Capitol Hill.

Organizing Structure: "A grid street system, involving the simplest approach to surveying, subdividing, and selling land, created a well-defined, organized, and understandable spatial structure for the cities' architecture and overall development. Because the street provided the main access to the consumer market, competition for street frontage was keen. Development parcels were normally much deeper than they were wide, creating a pattern of relatively narrow building fronts that provided variety and articulation in each block and continuous activity on the street." (p. 12)

The street grid, transportation practices and construction technology of the times, and the cost and value of the land led to a particular form of development on city blocks that focused attention on the streets and sidewalks, creating a human-scaled, architecturally harmonious built environment.

As construction technology advanced and taller buildings could be constructed, and as the walking and transit city was supplanted by the automobile, the scale of block development changed significantly, with a focus away from the pedestrian and towards the car, as this photo of Levittown, Pennsylvania shows.

levittowngrid

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home