Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space

"A community’s physical form, rather than its land uses, is its most intrinsic and enduring characteristic." [Katz, EPA] This blog focuses on place and placemaking and all that makes it work--historic preservation, urban design, transportation, asset-based community development, arts & cultural development, commercial district revitalization, tourism & destination development, and quality of life advocacy--along with doses of civic engagement and good governance watchdogging.

Monday, August 14, 2006

Poor Anacostia, so far from God, and so close to the United States (Government and the Washington Post)

Anacostia OverviewAnacostia development analysis image by Arkitera.

In college, studying political science, I was especially interested in "political development" and Latin America. The saying about Mexico, "Poor Mexico, so far from God and so close to the United States," has always stuck with me.

The same must go for Anacostia. It has so many great assets:

-- historic residential building stock;
-- the Anacostia River;
-- close-in location;
-- some of the most incredible views in the city;
-- Frederick Douglass House and the Anacostia Museum; etc.,

yet it is "aided" by the city's planning regime, the Federal Government, and the Washington Post.

That's perhaps a three strike situation.

Its interesting that there is the Anacostia Waterfront Initiative, but to the best of my knowledge, not a real "neighborhood plan" to guide revitalization. There is some stuff on the OP website, the East of the River Initiative, with these goals:

- Encourage neighborhood economic development
- Expand job opportunities
- Improve housing and increase opportunities for homeownership
- Strengthen the infrastructure
- Raise the quality of life for residents east of the Anacostia River


but the stuff on the web lacks detail.

So today's Post editorial, "Use St. Elizabeths," subtitled "Federal offices may be the best bet for a vacant historical landmark. But does it have to become a fortress?"is more of the same. It says that it's better to do some "satisficed" use (not their term, one I learned in a public administration class) than let it moulder.

I don't have the energy to rail against the piece. Instead, I will refer you to these past writings:

-- Enclave development won't "save" Anacostia;
-- Office buildings won't "save" Anacostia;
-- One more thing about Anacostia and office buildings;
-- Arson as a(nother) redevelopment strategem; and
-- Falling up -- Accountability and DC Community Development Corporations.

Index Keywords:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home