An argument for the aesthetic quality of the ensemble: special design guidelines are required for DC's avenues
Thomas Circle is in the middle of this photograph, taken by Jason Hawkes for the Washington Convention and Tourism Corporation.
Last week the National Trust for Historic Preservation's annual conference was held in DC.
But sadly it felt like DC as a node in the story of preservation policy and practice was a negligible piece of the conference agenda.
I expected that "pressing issues in 'preservation'" as reflected by present day DC experiences would have been central to the meeting's agenda.
There is a lot to learn, positive and negative.
For example, while I lament that far more buildings are unprotected rather than protected, DC has arguably the strongest local historic preservation law in the US, where interested parties who are not owners can submit nominations for landmarking, and the city's regulatory body, the Historic Preservation Review Board, makes decisions, not recommendations--in other cities, final decisions are made by the legislative branch, and recommendations made on historic preservation grounds are often rejected in favor of other considerations.
Still, there are many gaps in the protections that exist. DC's laws are all or nothing. Where buildings are designated, the protections are extensive. But there are virtually no protections for buildings eligible for historic designation, but not designated.
For example, ensuring high quality architectural and urban design treatments on DC's "avenues and boulevards" and at entry points into the city, when those areas aren't historically designated is one such issue.
In my comments a couple years ago on the DC preservation plan, I recommended that we move to managing the city's urban design qualities as if the entire city were a heritage area, which would mean mandatory design review, regardless of whether or not a particular area, building or site were designated.
I argue it's shifting from thinking of and regulating the built environment on a building by building basis and instead considering these questions more broadly in terms of the built environment on a larger scale, as a "cultural landscape."
This is an extension of arguments made by Stephen Semes ("The Bias Against Tradition," Wall Street Journal). His book, The Future of the Past: A Conservation Ethic for Architecture, Urbanism and Historic Preservation, argues in favor of classical design as a way to protect and strengthen the architectural character of existing places, when new design is frequently discordant and diminishes the strength of the built environment as an ensemble. From the article:
"Maintaining a broad stylistic consistency in traditional settings is not a matter of 'nostalgia,'" he says. "It's a matter of common sense, of reinforcing the sense of place that made a building or neighborhood special to begin with. But many academically trained preservationists want to impose their inevitably subjective notions of what the architecture 'of our time' is."Corridors. Thinking about aesthetic quality of streets as ensemble elements in urban design is not a new concept, although much of the work on the topic in the post-war era has been focused on suburban strips, the impact of sprawl, automobile-centric design, and a cacophony of signage, and has focused on commercial buildings. Ed McMahon, now of the Urban Land Institute, and others are known for their work in this area.
Slide from a presentation by Ed McMahon.
Yet, the corridor problem predates the widespread adoption of the automobile. Cities that had extensive streetcar systems, such as Detroit, Chicago, Los Angeles, Philadelphia (e.g., Germantown Avenue, Girard Avenue), Toronto, Washington, DC and others developed in a similar pattern, lined for miles by storefronts.
Today, these streets are difficult to improve, except at nodes, given fundamental changes in how people live, work, shop, and get around. Note that the recommendations in the Urban Land Institute report, Ten Principles for Reshaping America's Suburban Strips, are no less relevant to center cities.
In plans I produced for Cambridge, Maryland, Baltimore County, Maryland, and Brunswick, Georgia, recommendations were retained that called for special attention to the urban design qualities of corridors both for quality of life and placemaking reasons as well as because of how the built environment along the city's main streets and entryways shapes the identity of the community for residents and visitors.
DC created a "Great Streets" program with the intent of leveraging transportation infrastructure investments for broader revitalization improvements, in part based on the commercial district revitalization effort on H Street NE, which was built on a revitalization plan and targeted investments including transportation infrastructure and streetscape improvements.
Being one of the founders of the H Street initiative, I have written extensively about it ("The community development approach and the revitalization of DC's H Street corridor: congruent or oppositional approaches?" and pieces cited within) and commercial district revitalization ("The long term shake out of local retailers and independent commercial districts") more generally.
I argue that much of the reason for corridor decline in the urban renewal period ("The five periods of urban revitalization> since WWII") was the construction of new buildings with designs that rejected local identity and spirit of place. Instead of repairing the built environment and microeconomy of neighborhoods, the community development and urban renewal approach exacerbated the problems.
The 21st century revitalization program for H Street focused on adding population and suggested context-sensitive design for infill construction.
Washington Post graphic from the H Street Revitalization Plan produced in 2003.
It's been successful on H Street, but the program pre-existed the "Great Streets" initiative, and it has been difficult to reproduce H Street's success on other commercial corridors elsewhere in the city. Mostly, areas around transit stations and districts in the core of the city improve, while areas outside of the core or without transit stations continue to languish.
DC's Urban Design Element calls attention to the city's avenues but substantive actions have yet to be made. The Urban Design Element of DC's Comprehensive Land Use Plan discusses the importance of the city's avenues as defining features of the city and its identity. From the Urban Design Element:
Design decisions should reinforce the city’s pattern of axial, radial, and diagonal streets, and enhance the public spaces formed where these streets intersect one another. (p. 9-4)An entire policy section is devoted to "Reinforcing Boulevards and Gateways" but in the almost 10 years since the Comprehensive Plan was approved, necessary actions to put protections in place have not occurred. For example, there has been no movement on this recommendation:
UD-1.4 Reinforcing Boulevards and Gateways. Grand streets in the form of avenues and boulevards are another defining element of Washington’s urban form. The avenues originated as part of the L’Enfant design for the city. By overlapping a system of broad,
diagonal thoroughfares on a grid of lettered and numbered streets, streets like Pennsylvania Avenue were given immediate importance, creating memorable views and a strong sense of civic identity. Beyond the heart of the city, these avenues extend to the outer neighborhoods, in some cases forming dramatic points of entry into the District of Columbia. Over time, several other streets in the city grid were designed or redesigned to display similar characteristics. (p.9-12)
Action UD-1.4.A: Zoning and Views: As part of the revision of the District’s zoning regulations, determine the feasibility of overlays or special design controls that would apply to major boulevards and gateway streets. The purpose of such overlays would be to ensure the protection and enhancement of important views and to upgrade the aesthetic quality of key boulevards.If this recommendation had been actualized, it wouldn't be necessary to write this piece.
It happens that DC has a wide range of distinctively designed apartment buildings, and four streets in particular--Connecticut Avenue, 16th Street, Wisconsin Avenue, and Massachusetts Avenue--are defined by this type, block after block, mile after mile.
Generally, the collection is harmonious, unified by the use of brick and stone but marked by a great variety of designs, shapes and sizes.
James Goode's Best Addresses is probably the most definitive work on DC's apartment buildings as a type. But what is lacking is a more full-blown thematic study of apartment buildings, treating apartment buildings as a thematic category within the nation's and city's built heritage. Unlike for "historic residential suburbs," I don't believe that the National Park Service has developed a thematic study on apartment buildings as a type.
With such a framework in place, it would be easier to justify setting higher standards and expectations for the construction of new apartment buildings, especially on an infill basis, in DC and other cities.
Belvedere Apartments, 13th Street and Massachusetts Avenue NW. Flickr photo by Josh.
The property owner specifically calls attention to the proposed architectural design in terms of the the site's centrality as a key entry point into the city. From the article:
The application refers to the site as a "gateway," as it touches the very northern edge of the District at its border with Silver Spring. According to the rezoning package, “the proposed building will effectively become a new landmark at the edge of the District.” The design, from Hickok Cole, features projecting bays, window wall glazing, brick and stone.Despite the assertions by the property owner, the design for the building at Eastern and Georgia Avenues isn't noteworthy, at least it isn't noteworthy from a positive standpoint.
The design of the building is pretty typical of the city's new apartment buildings. It's unmemorable, but not to the point of execrable. Average, banal, sure. If the developer is going to make claims about great architecture, then the results as currently projected should not go unchallenged.
Interestingly, while most of the buildings that will be demolished at the "Eastern Avenue Gateway" site lack heritage qualities, there is a subset that have been designed in a simple but attractive art deco style that if referenced, could yield a design that rises and projects gateway character.
Also, art deco is one of the defining architectural styles of the Silver Spring conurbation in Montgomery County, the area of Montgomery County which abuts this "gateway."
As a way of connecting to the architectural heritage of the two districts, utilization of the art deco architectural style makes sense.
Designing the building in art deco style would be a much better contribution to the gateway aspect of the location, would be a respectful acknowledgement of the best designed buildings currently on the site, and if done properly would be an upgrade to the neighborhood, the Georgia Avenue corridor, and to its location on a major avenue and entryway into the City of Washington.
Note that the condominium building constructed by the same company at the intersection of 4th Street, H Street, and Massachusetts Avenue NW does project a design worthy of a gateway building. The design responds to the triangular shape of the lot, its location on a prominent avenue and its position as an entrypoint to Downtown and the Central Business District and on major arteries into and out of the city.
400 Massachusetts Avenue NW. In a modern exception to the general "rule" of how triangularly shaped buildings tend to be designed the side elevations are accentuated with a wave form design and different colors of brick, rather than by a more background treatment.
As a downtown or suburban office building this glass curtain-wall cladded building would be unmemorable, sub-average but typical of the type.
As an apartment building it is an outlier because it is rare, at least in this region (Manhattan, Miami, and more recently London are exceptions) for apartment buildings to be clad fully in glass.
Like many older US cities, DC too has a signature collection of apartment buildings and Connecticut Avenue is one of the city's signature avenues, defined by brick and stone apartment buildings stretching from Dupont Circle almost to the Maryland border.
Comparing the 5333 building to other apartment buildings on three different scales: (1) in the vicinity of the site; (2) along the entire length of Connecticut Avenue; and (3) in comparison to the city's collection of signature apartment buildings, I would argue it fails.
It challenges convention but the ordinariness of the design--extraordinary only because of its absolute discordance-- fails to support its challenge to a more conventional approach that is more appropriate to its location within the urban ensemble that is Connecticut Avenue and the Chevy Chase neighborhood.
2001 16th Street NW
Over the decades this has resulted in a large number of buildings, commercial and residential, designed to accentuate the triangular shape of the lot.
This is a phenomenon not unique to DC.
Many cities, in the US such as New York City in Manhattan especially starting with the Flatiron Building and Chicago, and around the world, especially in Paris, have similar spatial conditions which have generated a large number of triangular shaped buildings, and a unique and attractive building type.
109 Prince Street (1882) at Prince and Green Streets. New York City, New York. Flickr photo by Dan Haneckow.
Madrid. Photographer unknown.
Logan Square area, Chicago.
Ornate or not, typically the design of such buildings focuses attention on and accentuates the apex, while treating the building's elevations more as a background element, attractive but secondary to the unique shape of the building.
Just as an argument can be made for the necessity of a thematic survey of apartment buildings, DC needs a thematic survey of triangle buildings.
And the place of this type of building needs to be maintained and utilized going forward when considering new projects, in terms of the architectural possibilities offered by odd shaped lots and the broader urban design and placemaking characteristics of the city's avenues and how their intersections create the potential for attractive and atypical architecture.
Another site on Georgia Avenue that raises "gateway" issues is the sliver of land between New Hampshire Ave. NW and Rock Creek Ford Road NW at the southeast corner of the intersection of Georgia and New Hampshire Avenues.
This is a "gateway" site, but at a node within the city, rather than an entry point. It's a triangular site, currently occupied by a number of undistinguished liner buildings.
The Georgia Avenue-New Hampshire intersection is the location of the only Metrorail station on Georgia Avenue, and with the addition of new multiunit buildings, more population has sparked significant improvement of neighborhood retail and restaurant options. The commercial area around the station and on nearby Upshur Street is on the rise.
Compared to many buildings, the proposed apartment building for the site is attractively designed.
But the design inadequately acknowledges the triangular nature of the lot, instead squaring off the building at the apex.
In the great tradition of DC's triangular buildings at avenue junctions, ideally the design would express the form of the lot in the shape of the building, focused at the apex, (Note that the rendering shown in an UrbanTurf article about the project, perhaps generated at an earlier point in the process, is even more attractive, but still de-emphasizes the triangle.)
Google Street View of the site.
1400 H Street NE/1401 Florida Avenue NE. Failing to acknowledge the principles of the best designed triangle-shaped buildings--delineating the apex with the building's elevations attractive but subservient to the point of the triangle--is the issue with the renderings for the new apartment building on a triangular lot on the 1400 block of H St. NE at Florida Avenue ("New gateway to H Street NE? Mixed-use building proposed for site next to Starburst intersection," Washington Business Journal).
A gatehouse at the intersection of Bladensburg Road and Maryland Avenue, was where tolls were collected from people entering the city.
For decades, H Street was one of the city's most important commercial districts--one of the nation's first Sears Department Stores was built a short distance away--but the corridor languished starting in the 1950s as residents left the city for the suburbs.
Separately from projects around Union Station, as much as $1 billion in new construction has been built, is under construction, or planned for the corridor, since the revitalization plan for the corridor was released in 2003.
As a "gateway" building at a key entry point to an increasingly important and revived commercial corridor, there should be much greater attention to ensuring the production of a lasting architectural treatment for this site.
Interestingly, this building and the project in Petworth share the same architectural firm, PGN Architects.
Compared to ouevre of historic triangularly-shaped buildings on city avenues, the design contravenes tradition by drawing attention to the side elevations rather than the apex.
But H Street is not designated historic and therefore there are no provisions with DC's building regulatory process to step in and suggest better design principles with the aim of generating a better outcome that will last the stand of time.
Triangular building, Culver Hotel, Culver City, Los Angeles
Conclusion. High quality, often historic, architecture and urban design is the foundation of the city's identity and competitive advantage.
Today, it seems as if buildings are thrown up with little consideration for how they contribute to the built environment beyond the lot lines. This was not the case for buildings constructed before 1945.
Construction during the urban renewal era has accentuated the split as new buildings are lot specific and generally haven't been designed to connect to, extend, and strengthen the extant built environment.
H Street Connection, a strip shopping center, was constructed in the 1980s. Behind it is an urban renewal era senior housing development.
Before, buildings were constructed to last and the developer typically intended to own what they built for a long time, further "incentivizing" them to build well. Architects designed buildings to complement the existing context and building stock present around the site.
Then, it wasn't as important to "regulate" design because it was a given that buildings would be designed to be attractive and to be an improvement over what they replaced.
Today's conventions for development and design are much different, and it is much more likely for new construction to be subpar compared to buildings constructed 70 years ago, or earlier.
Because the building regulatory process is focused on individual buildings rather than the ensemble, "extraordinary" steps are required to protect and project the interest of the built environment as a whole.
That's why I argue ("Changing matter of right zoning regulations for houses to conform to heights typical within neighborhoods, not the allowable maximum") that the city's built environment should be managed and regulated as if the entire city is a heritage area.
That doesn't mean that every building has to be designed as if it were a monument, but it would provide for design review where there are no provisions for such review currently.
But to build the consensus for that will take years, and in the meantime, the architectural character and quality of the city's major streets continues to be diminished by insensitively designed infill construction.
Therefore, as recommended in the Comprehensive Plan, a process should be instituted to provide design review for gateway sites and the city's major avenues and streets, because of the extranormal position these elements play in the city's built environment.