There has to be a better way to spend $1.85 billion on "revitalization" just to demolish buildings: The US needs its own version of Germany's International Building Exhibition, let's start with Detroit
Detroit's proposed plan to address vacant properties that make up an increasing percentage of the abandoned city's building stock is to demolish them. See "Why bankrupt Detroit wants to destroy nearly one-quarter of its houses" from the Christian Science Monitor.
The proposal is to spend $850 million to demolish 85,000 houses, at $10,000 per building, and to spend another $1 billion to demolish vacant industrial properties.
The problem is all that does is create a different problem--lots of empty land that gets stuff dumped on it, has to have the grass cut, etc., an ongoing and expensive maintenance headache. And all you do is produce empty land which isn't productive.
I don't know what to recommend exactly. Detroit's problem is residential and commercial abandonment, abetted by deindustrialization but also a concerted policy by the auto industry to move out of Detroit and out of Michigan in order to reduce the power of labor and the UAW within the state.
Detroit is collateral damage, although I also argue that the way Detroit is the end game of what the auto industry expected to have happen to cities, because cities weren't the right built environment for accommodating cars.
Ironically, today the Center for Community Progress announced that the sixth national Reclaiming Vacant Properties Conference will be held next year in Detroit, May 19-21, 2015.
I wrote up the summary piece on European regeneration practices based on the eight cities I wrote about for the Europe in Baltimore project but it hasn't been published yet.
There are a bunch of recommendations: how to organize successful revitalization efforts; issues raised by the European Capital of Culture program; recommendations for Baltimore; recommendations for the US/Federal Government; (and a brief thought about US social housing policy).
One of the things I suggested is that it would be great for the US to create "an event program" comparable to Germany's IBA/International Building Exhibition (Internationale Bauausstellung).
-- Alice Shay's MIT thesis on the IBA program
IBA doesn't happen on a lock step schedule, but is about every 5 to 10 years. The intent of the Expo is to model new techniques for construction and design through the physical transformation of urban sites and districts, thereby repositioning the image and brand of a city.
IBA is focused on what we might call “learning through seeing” and “installations,” accomplished through actively creating and implementing “on-the-ground” projects. They do a rigorous review of the process and have an extensive publishing program that helps to disseminate the learning.
A city-region is selected based on the level of its problems or questions that it raises and the commitment to address them in a multi-year program that culminates in a variety of physical transformation projects that significantly change the built and natural environment in ways that are truly remarkable--the Emscher Landscape Park project in the Ruhr region of Germany is in its third decade.
The charge for IBA Hamburg was/is to find solutions to three challenges faced by most cities, especially cities located on ports and rivers: the impact of climate change; modifying the urban landscape for new economic circumstances (in the face of limited resources); and social equity.
Imagine transforming US revitalization financing and planning programs to operate as demonstration projects on the massive scale of an BA program, rather than the small scale efforts that are more typical and take decades to achieve critical mass.
Detroit would be a good place to start.
That would be far better than a large scale demolition programs, as Detroit is planning to do ("Blight Cleanup Will Cost a Bankrupt Detroit $850 Million," New York Times) just to end up with empty land.
By contrast, about €2 billion of public and private investment will be spent on IBA Hamburg, on physical improvements to the the communities within the project area over the period of 2006-2020, when the entire forecasted program will have been accomplished--even though the exhibition year of the program was limited to 2013, the time for which a majority of the projects were completed and able to be displayed.
You can buy houses there now for as little as $3,000.