"The Whole World Is Watching"
charlie shares with us a message/photo entry from Popville on last nights protests, disturbances, and vandalism, and for once, the message thread is pretty good (normally, people's comments aren't that interesting, so I don't normally pay attention to Popville).
The back and forth in the thread -- protest vs. vandalism -- and the belief that the "vandals" and the protesters likely are two very different demographics, reminded me of the book The Whole World is Watching by Todd Gitlin. (Summary.)
Gitlin was a president of the SDS and went on to become a professor. The book is based on his dissertation, which is an analysis of the reporting on the Anti-war movement, focused on CBS News, then the dominant television network, long before the prevalence of cable television especially independent cable tv channels, and the New York Times.
A major point is that the lens which journalists cover demonstrations is through the approach to reporting on crime.
Another is how the reporting on the movement influenced the movement's leaders and decision making as well as people interested in joining and taking part.
But the key point is that the media are focused on maintaining existing social relations and aren't positioned to be able to communicate wide ranging narratives about structural issues (review, Carnegie Council, 1980).
Which is why I was so surprised to see this caption on photos of protests in South Florida via the Ft. Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel.
Protesters march in Coral Gables Florida on Saturday, May 30, 2020. The peaceful group was protesting the recent police killings including George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Eric Garner, Michael Brown, Sandra Bland and others. They were also protesting against: police brutality, systemic racism overt racism, racial oppression, mass incarceration, colorblind racism, and radicalized police. (Mike Stocker / South Florida Sun Sentinel).
Although I can't imagine that full caption was reprinted along with photographs published in newspapers.
With the rise and ubiquity of social media, I am struck by the "diffuse networking" of protest over the George Floyd killing and in how many seemingly disparate places there have been demonstrations ("Networked Social Movements And The ‘Tyranny Of Structurelessness’," Rhodri Davies).
New York Times graphic.
At the same time there is also an increased but diffuse networking around violent protest.
Where in the past, anarchist vandalism was localized, associated with demonstrating in the San Francisco Bay Area ("Anarchists in Berkeley play into the hands of enemies," San Francisco Chronicle) and Seattle ("Anarchists targeted after Seattle's violent May Day protests," Los Angeles Times; "May Day in Seattle has featured violence after peaceful marches," Seattle Times) especially around World Bank/IMF/world trade international meetings, now it appears to be nationwide.
It reminds me of the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks and the overthrow of the Provisional Russian Government after the initial Overthrow of Tsarist Rule. The Bolsheviks were prepared to act in the face of opportunities. They also worked to create and expand their opportunities ("How the Bolsheviks Won," Jacobin Magazine).
Today's anarchist-violent responses within the context of social protests seem similar.
I don't recall violence being associated so much with the #BlackLivesMatter demonstrations in the period bracketed by events in Ferguson, Missouri and Baltimore, Maryland. Occupy Protests across the US mostly didn't involve violence either.