Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space

"A community’s physical form, rather than its land uses, is its most intrinsic and enduring characteristic." [Katz, EPA] This blog focuses on place and placemaking and all that makes it work--historic preservation, urban design, transportation, asset-based community development, arts & cultural development, commercial district revitalization, tourism & destination development, and quality of life advocacy--along with doses of civic engagement and good governance watchdogging.

Monday, May 25, 2020

"Animal City: The Domestication of America" featured on the "Living on Earth" radio show

I don't listen to radio, especially NPR, as much as I would like, because I got into the habit of listening to the radio mostly in a car, and not being particularly car-bound, that means not much radio.

But I was making a dish, Ina Garten's Corn and Avocado Salad, which requires about an hour of chopping, and I turned the radio on to NPR affiliate KCPW, and they were broadcasting the environmental topics show "Living on Earth."

One of the segments was "Animal City: The Domestication of America," featuring Andrew Robichaud, author of the book of the same title, discussing how food animals had once been a key element of cities, dairies which I knew about and "feed lots" which I didn't, and the process of removing those functions first to the outskirts of cities and then out of cities altogether.

It's definitely worth a listen.

It's an important history that still comes up from time to time, because today's zoning regulations typically restrict animals even chickens on residential properties, and forbid even small scale slaughtering and other types of food production, including craft brewing and distillation, even large scale baking, in industrially zoned lands.

This came up last year in Alexandria, Virginia.

Their zoning regulations no longer forbid animal slaughtering and some residents opposed the approval of a small halal poultry operation ("Halal slaughterhouse and shop wins approval from divided council in Alexandria, Va.," Washington Post).

Opposition was complicated.  Some was about concerns over the potential for smell and improperly handled waste, as well as anti-Muslim beliefs or anti-meat consumption.

As a small scale operation nothing like a Swift meatpacking plant, many of those concerns were overblown, or not relevant to a discussion on zoning and allowable uses.

In the episode Professor Robichaud mentions an area of San Francisco once called "Butchertown," where animals were kept and slaughtered.

It reminded me of the real life Butchertown district in Louisville, where there is a Swift slaughterhouse/meatpacking plant (still operating today) and the distinct ever present smell of animals, at least when I was there in 2004.

Back when I ran a historic preservation study on the H Street neighborhood, one of the elements covered in the neighborhood history section was how the area had once been on the outskirts of the city, that there were "market gardens," small plots used to grow produce for sale in the city, and abattoirs, slaughterhouses for animals.

Horses.  We also discussed a bit why there were stables and carriage houses, and drayage.  When leading a walking tour once, someone asked a question about "what happened to all the horseshit?" but I didn't have a good answer.

Another book on this topic is The Horse in the City: Living Machines in the Nineteenth Century, which came out a few years after our study.

Issues around "the horse in the city" still comes up in the modern day.

Depending on the city, there may still be horse stables and public access to horse riding. Many police departments also have horse-mounted police units ("Long Legs of the Law : Mounted police units are valued for crowd control and park patrols--but training takes more than horse sense," Los Angeles Times) and there can be complaints about how they are deployed in crowd control.

(In DC, both the US Park Police and the Metropolitan Police Department have mounted police units. The US Capitol Police had such a unit for a brief time, but Congress disbanded the unit over costs.)

Other issues I am familiar with include:

• in cities like New York City, animal rights activists fight the continuation of tourist oriented carriage rides ("In His 5th Year as Mayor, de Blasio Finally Acts on Horse-Carriage Pledge," New York Times).  These horses are still stabled in the city.

• in Baltimore, "a-rabbers" sell fruit and vegetables from horse-drawn carts and animal rights activists are opposed as well ("As Baltimore's arabbers become a thing of the past, a photographer aims to preserve the tradition," Baltimore Sun").

• and in some trail planning processes, although more in suburban and exurban areas, it is common to include access to horses alongside pedestrians and cyclists

Food animals and cities today.  And re-legalization of small scale, "backyard" animal husbandry has been an issue for awhile.  I call the opportunity to do this with your neighbors "Block supported agriculture."  Post columnist Tamar Haspel just wrote about this in the context of the rise in chicken raising as a result of the pandemic ("7 tips for raising backyard chickens, from picking a breed to having an exit strategy").

Seattle may be the most liberal city in the US when it comes to such regulations, whereas many cities aren't interested in going that far, and may or may not be comfortable with chickens.  DC is definitely a laggard on that score.

Animal agriculture and land use master planning.  Some counties have divided their land uses in ways to permanently protect rural lands.  Baltimore County, Maryland was one of the first in the late 1960s.  The way they militate against sprawl is to refuse to provide "city water" service to rural areas of the county.

Greater Portland is known for its Urban Growth boundary, although all areas in Oregon are required to urban and rural zones as part of master planning processes.

Montgomery County Maryland has a large Agriculture Reserve, about 30% of the county's 507 square miles, although as one former planning director commented, "all that did was displace sprawl past it to Frederick County" ("Montgomery seeks new crop of farmers," Washington Post).

As rural areas suburbanize there are often conflicts between new residents and extant agriculture operations ("‘Right To Farm’ Laws Allow Ag To Be Stinky And Noisy, But Some Neighbors Cry ‘Fowl’," Colorado Public Radio; "Suburban farms meet opposition as they look to change business," Baltimore Sun; "Beer-fueled fight in Fairfax prompts officials to look at state farming law," Washington Post).  Often such disputes end up in court.

Communities with agricultural land typically have an agriculture element within their land use master plans, while cities typically do not.  Although this is changing as the interest in Urban Agriculture grows.


(Not related to animals.) 

Front yard gardening.  Another issue is front yard gardening, which many people consider "messy" and many zoning codes forbid ("The Battlefront in the Front Yard," NYT).  But depending on if you have a backyard and whether or not it gets enough sun, it might be the only option people have for growing vegetables.

Related is the concept of the Edible Landscape/Foodscaping.  More about this some other time.

Labels: , , , , , ,

8 Comments:

At 1:06 PM, Anonymous charlie said...

I'm going to suspect that the public health arguments against keeping livestock in a city just got a lot stronger.

In walking around DC, I've noticed for the first time a large number of dead birds. There are various reports of rat populations dying of hunger, but if anything I've seen a lot more rats in the last two months. But not sure on the dead birds. They usually get eaten very quickly but not now.

The amount of dog crap on the sidewalks is sickening.

A large part of european urbanism can be traced to EU price supports for agriculture. Makes farm land far more expensive and keeps the built up urban areas smaller.

Loudoun does the same thing -- no sewer service to Western half of county.

If you want density, you need to drive the land price up enough to justify building it up.

 
At 2:56 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

1. You've always made that point vis a vis poultry, and there is a lot to be said for your position.

OTOH, I'd say small coops, even single animals probably aren't a big deal. But we'd really need to do a study of Seattle, which is probably the most liberal wrt such policies. There are definitely limits. It's not at the point of what would support the equivalent of market gardening.

2. I think in Nov. I argued with a guy who let his dog s*** on the sidewalk in Sugarhouse. And of course, we see dog dump here and there, including on our lawn.

========
Apologies for the next section as it is pedantic
========

3. Very good (and basic) point that density is dependent on land value and land restriction.

But I hadn't thought of it in terms of the EU price supports for agriculture. I should have been cognizant of it.

In my Essen arts trip, one of the places we went to was a micro-farm, along the main freeway, A40, not too far from the city. They had farm animals, a cornfield or two, made and sold sausage and meats that they sold. The spaces weren't contiguous because they'd been split by the freeway.

Probably they were still in business because of the ag. supports, which we didn't discuss.

--------

One of my e-correspondents argued with me about the issue of density more than a month ago.

A lot of people argue that "development induces density, is just to make profits for developers, drives prices up" etc.

No, prices go up because people want to be in X location. That in turn drives the demand for density.

It's why I argue that TOD is so difficult in Greater Baltimore, because transit in and of itself doesn't drive demand for proximate land. Therefore, it doesn't "pencil" for building more densely. Etc.

------
I wasn't that great at economics because I am not great at math. As I say here from time to time, the anti-development housing advocates make me sound like a genius. They basically argue that not building will keep prices down.

The issue isn't whether or not pricing will increase. It will, because there are more people in the city, in the country, than when the area was built up.

So the point is to deal with this with protections for people with less ability to compete in the market and with surgically increasing density (and "surgically" also means in terms of design) to increase supply.

 
At 8:39 AM, Anonymous charlie said...

https://www.ft.com/content/a313a40c-b046-4b11-b302-41d9f347cddb

(free to read)

Lots and lots of new puppies around.

Again if you goal is to have a home office, puppy, maybe a home gym -- you're moving pretty far from what you can do in a urban dwelling. Let alone kids.


 
At 12:55 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

Dogs aren't anti urban. But a pain. E.g., the building at 1st and M NE kitty corner from Harris-Teeter has a wing dedicated to allowing dogs, a petcare room, etc.

Dogs having to be walked helps to put "eyes on the street" and provides the opportunity for "social bridges" bringing together people who would not otherwise meet.

That being said, having to be regimented to managing a dog seems to remove a lot of spontaneity and opportunity that urban living can present.

Kids... well, it's easier in SFH, not apartments.

 
At 1:01 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

Thanks for the FT article. It's excellent. I am behind in mentioning the NYT Sunday Review section from two weeks ago, all on "the city."

-------

WRT the issue of cities and densities, I think the issue is about income and crowding. People of means pretty much don't have to worry.

But the issue of proximity for long periods of time, in places like offices, restaurants, hair salons, bars, special events, sporting events, gyms, etc. is going to be a problem until there is a vaccine.

Transit

With public transportation, if people are in close proximity, what is the story. Most transit trips are shorter than the one that was studied in Wuhan.

(bus, subway, light rail -- not trains)

If people wear masks would that make a difference?

 
At 10:32 AM, Anonymous charlie said...

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-05-28/are-supercities-like-new-york-about-to-shrink-a-debate?srnd=premium&sref=4NgeXq8Q


 
At 3:47 PM, Anonymous charlie said...

Villa Volvo Vuuve

https://hejsweden.com/en/swedish-life-goals-villa-volvo-vuvve/


 
At 1:05 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

The Washington Post: Halal slaughterhouse, DC Live Poultry, opens in Alexandria following years of controversy.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/08/12/alexandria-chicken-halal-slaughterhouse-live/

 

Post a Comment

<< Home