Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space

"A community’s physical form, rather than its land uses, is its most intrinsic and enduring characteristic." [Katz, EPA] This blog focuses on place and placemaking and all that makes it work--historic preservation, urban design, transportation, asset-based community development, arts & cultural development, commercial district revitalization, tourism & destination development, and quality of life advocacy--along with doses of civic engagement and good governance watchdogging.

Thursday, October 10, 2024

Death of former Washington Post columnist Roger Lewis

Roger Lewis was an architect and consultant on community design matters, and professor at the University of Maryland.  

The way most anyone has heard of his is that he wrote a newspaper column running in the Washington Post Real Estate section for many years, starting in the mid-1980s, called "Shaping the City." and he wrote about "good urbanism."  

He often drew a cartoon to accompany the column.

-- Obituary

At the time, his column, along with a then similar column in the Washington City Paper, educated me a lot about good urbanism--I was always into cities but after 1972, except for a stint in Ann Arbor, I lived in the suburbs, until I moved to DC in 1987.

I only interacted with him once, on the Design Review Committee for the 11th Street Bridge Park Project, aimed at adding park space to the city, a premier project across the river, connecting Capitol Hill and Anacostia and East of the River and West of the River. He was a great resource.

-- "Revisiting the 11th Street Bridge Park project as an opportunity rather than a folly: a new revitalization agenda for East of the River, DC"

His column was dropped in 2022.  When I met him he said over the yeas, some Post editors were into the column, others indifferent.  

But because architecture and especially historic architecture is one of defining characteristics, it's a shame that the Post has very little writing on architecture and urban design these days--although it's typical of newspapers across the country as they've downsized as a result of circulation losses.

In the US, besides writers at the New York Times, Inga Saffron at the Philadelphia Inquirer and John King at the San Francisco Chronicle are the two consistent writers on urban design.  But King is retiring, so it will be interesting to see if he is replaced with another top notch writer.

Christopher Knight, the art critic at the Los Angeles Times, writes a lot about architecture too, especially since his counterpart as architecture critic, Christopher Hawthorne, left the paper a few yeas ago.

Labels: ,

2 Comments:

At 11:37 AM, Anonymous charlie said...

Interesting read:

https://pedestrianobservations.com/2024/10/14/transit-advocacy-and-lack-of-ideology-in-new-york/#respond

There is an effort underway in DC council to undercut HP in exchange for density. Don't know much about it as of yet, but does conform with above model -- the primary political purpose of YIMBY is to attach previous generation of reformers.

 
At 12:04 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

Will read. Good point about generations. One point I've made for a long time is how hp was great for stabilization in the shrinking city but needed to rearticulate the message and practice for the growing city.

Frankly, while ggw acolytes think they saved the city, it was hp, which saved all the historic (designated or not) neighborhoods new residents reattracted to the city after decades of ignoring it wanted to live in.

I think there is plenty of build out opportunity in the city without having to demolish historic buildings and neighborhoods. Especially considering the cost of land makes SFH, even rowhouses, to expensive to build except in odd corners like old Catholic institutions in Brookland.

It's unfortunate that no one on the Council seems to know much about the built environment.

There are selective opportunities to rebuild small apartments here and there, by combining lots. Eg I'm not advocating for it but you could take our lot and those on either side and maybe build 30 apartments. ADUs and basements too, and sometimes both depending on lot size (current law limits it to one or the other). Maybe subsidize some apartments to have bigger units, eg the complaint about no three bedrooms. You could zone a block on either side of Georgia for density (like what Arlington did) for density. Politically it would be difficult. And Arlington took 30 years to see the results.

The other thing about the generations is hubris, their knowledge of a particular city's history tends to start and finish from when they move in. So they don't have a good grasp of the historical element of the built environment.

The other thing is it's a slick way to put white owners of historic buildings (probably the majority) against the city's black elite.

And today's market is sell high, buy higher. By definition new housing will cost more being built at today's cost for land, labor, materials and finance. You add units that people can't afford. That's a plus?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home