Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space

"A community’s physical form, rather than its land uses, is its most intrinsic and enduring characteristic." [Katz, EPA] This blog focuses on place and placemaking and all that makes it work--historic preservation, urban design, transportation, asset-based community development, arts & cultural development, commercial district revitalization, tourism & destination development, and quality of life advocacy--along with doses of civic engagement and good governance watchdogging.

Wednesday, August 13, 2025

DC's Source Theater sold: cause for a cy pres review?

WBJ image.

In a follow up to the blog entry "Lack of a system breeds more of the same: Source Theater, Washington DC, up for sale 2006, 2024," from last December, the Washington Business Journal reports ("Source Theatre building on 14th Street NW sold to restaurateurs for $4.5M,") that the building has been sold to restauranteurs.  

The original asking price was more than $5 million, and CulturalDC, the owners of the property, although it had been acquired with funding from DC government, sold it the group because they offered more money than the primary tenant, the Constellation Theatre Group.  From the Washington City Paper ("CulturalDC Sells Source Theatre to Restaurateurs):

“On multiple occasions, Constellation asked CulturalDC for a meeting to discuss a deal and share our funding sources, but they would not accept our invitations. Finally, in April 2025, Constellation sent our Best and Final Offer of $4.1 million. We know the email was received, yet CulturalDC chose not to respond and instead, allowed the offer to expire.”

For years, Source has served as the home base for several performing arts organizations, including Constellation and local opera company IN Series, as well as a site of CulturalDC’s own programming. The public listing for the building had an asking price of $5.8 million; it later dropped to $5 million, according to WBJ. But the price it ultimately sold for was $4.5 million—just $400,000 more than Constellation’s April offer.

President and CEO of Theatre Washington (and former City Paper publisher) Amy Austin expressed grief over the sale, writing via email: “I am sad that the Source Theatre has been sold to a restauranteur/developer and will no longer be available as a much-needed performance space for our ever evolving theatre community. The Source was a special place that holds a collective almost 50-year history of memories and experiences that touched countless audiences and artists.”

The city government evidently is too busy putting money into professional sports, $500+ million for basketball and hockey, and $1 billion for football, to address the matter of the Source Theater, which I believe was acquired with DC funds.  (The reality is that governments only have so much capacity for dealing with such matters, and the Source Theater likely fell through the cracks, because the city doesn't really have an arts and cultural agency in the sense of cities like Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, etc.)

In "When BTMFBA isn't enough: keeping civic assets public through cy pres review" (2016), I argue that the State Attorney General should intervene in nonprofit real estate matters, when the property will lose its non profit use as a result of the sale, for a review if not recession of the sale.  Cy pres provides for independent review of decisions by nonprofit organizations.

The doctrine originated in the law of charitable trusts, but has been applied in the context of class action settlements in the United States. When the original objective of the settlor or the testator became impossible, impracticable, or illegal to perform, the cy-près doctrine allows the court to amend the terms of the charitable trust as closely as possible to the original intention of the testator or settlor to prevent the trust from failing. -- Wikipedia

While the State AGs in New York (Cooper Union College), Pennsylvania (Girard College, Art Museum) and DC (Corcoran Gallery of Art) have taken on such matters, the outcome isn't preordained, and they don't necessarily use the frame of review--keeping the facility open, for arts uses--that I would.

For example, the Pennsylvania AG didn't get involved in the sale of the assets of the University of the Arts, which shut down last year.  Through the sales, some of the properties maintained their cultural use, others will not ("Keeping Avenue of the Arts for the Arts,' Philadelphia Citizen).

Similarly, the DC AG did not push what I thought should happen ("Should community culture master plans include elements on higher education arts programs?" [2016]).

While CulturalDC may have financial problems of its own, hence the sale, I'd say its worthwhile in the public interest for the sale to be rescinded in favor of a purchase by Constellation.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

4 Comments:

At 5:33 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

Apparently in Massachusetts, property transfers by nonprofits are reviewed as a matter of course.

From parishioners to tenants: More churches are repurposing their real estate into affordable housing

Congregations from Roxbury to Cambridge to Allston are opting to transform mostly empty properties into housing for lower income families

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2025/08/13/business/churches-affordable-housing

So, pending approval from the public charities division of the attorney general’s office, Second Congregational will hand the building over to Lifebridge in a year or so. It’s essentially a charitable donation, which the nonprofit plans to use as a services center for the local homeless population that will complement its nearby shelters.

 
At 5:40 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

https://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/story/news/local/2025/06/03/museum-vote-a-win-for-us-and-a-win-for-the-citizens-of-montgomery/83883404007/

City Council deal 'a win' for the Montgomery Museum of Fine Arts

- The Montgomery City Council voted to reinstate the public-private partnership with the Montgomery Museum of Fine Arts Association, returning to the museum's historical governance model.
- The city will continue to maintain the building and grounds, while the association will manage exhibitions and art acquisitions.
- The council also approved funding to address HVAC issues threatening the museum

For nearly 60 years, this is how the museum has functioned, given that the city owns the building and land, and the association owns the art. The city also covers the majority of the museum employees' salaries, while the association allocates stipends for certain positions, allowing the museum to attract top talent.

The City Museum Board is made up of members whom the Montgomery City Council appoints.

The schism between the city and the association started when complaints were taken to the city instead of the board, and the city suspended and then later fired the previous director, Ford said.

The museum has not had a director since, and Ford said it has become a major issue. Since the problems between the association and the city have been resolved, the board will move forward on immediately beginning the search for a new director.

 
At 4:24 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

City Council seeks to subject West Philly university land dispositions to public oversight

https://www.inquirer.com/real-estate/university-city-development-jamie-gauthier-20250926.html

Councilmember Jamie Gauthier says her proposal will protect University City as mergers and closures of higher education institutions are likely to become more common.

Philadelphia Councilmember Jamie Gauthier introduced legislation Thursday that she says will help University City face a future where mergers and closures of higher education institutions are more common.

The zoning overlay bill would cover much of the University City section of West Philadelphia and is in direct response to St. Joseph University’s recent post-merger sale of much of the former University of the Sciences campus.

It would subject universities to public and community oversight when they sell lots over 5,000 square feet to non-higher-education institutions.

“Philadelphia has stood by and watched colleges and universities downsize, merge, close, and even file for bankruptcy,” Gauthier said in a statement. “The merger between the University of the Sciences and St. Joseph’s University and subsequent campus sale is the first major example in my council district, but national trends indicate that it won’t be the last.”

The zoning overlay bill would apply only in the University City corner of Gauthier’s district and not to properties owned and continuously operated by colleges or universities. For example, if Drexel University tried to redevelop a building on its campus, that would not trigger the legislation.

Neither demolition or construction would be allowed on land covered by the overlay until the Philadelphia Planning Commission reviewed the proposal and found that it fit with city plans for the area.

Advertisement
The bill lists six other criteria that projects must “satisfactorily address,” including impact on the historic campus fabric and public access to open space and courtyards.

One of those criteria includes preservation of existing campus buildings. The legislation also would not allow demolition permits to be issued in the district unless a building permit has also been issued for the same lot, in an effort to prevent vacant lots.

The overlay would regulate new construction over 25,000 square feet in size by requiring developers to meet with community representatives affiliated with at least five different groups.

During Planning Commission deliberations, at least two of these neighborhood representatives would have to be included in the vote.

 
At 8:46 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

https://www.crainsdetroit.com/nonprofits-philanthropy/city-birmingham-sues-community-house-maintain-center-site

City of Birmingham sues Community House to maintain center on site
12/2/2025

The city of Birmingham has sued the nonprofit Community House to enforce deed restrictions that require its downtown property to be held exclusively as a community center for Birmingham residents.

It is asking the court to issue a temporary restraining order to prohibit the sale or transfer of the property for any purposes that violate the deed restrictions.

“Such a sale is expressly prohibited by the governing deed restrictions, violates the 1989 Probate Court order and would permanently deprive the residents of the city of Birmingham of a unique civic and charitable asset intended for their benefit,” Kathleen Martone, the city's attorney with Varnum Law, said in the filing.

The lawsuit comes after the nonprofit Community House, in operation for just shy of 100 years, announced its plan last month to end its early child care and event rentals programs, lay off most of its employees, sell the historic property and convert itself to the Birmingham Area Community Foundation, effective July 1.

The moves are part of a plan to ensure its viability and help fund a permanent endowment to support other nonprofits focused on education, wellness and cultural vitality with grants and mentorship as well as provide scholarships for local students pursuing education beyond high school, the Community House told Crain’s last month.

But the city — giving voice to pushback from residents — is concerned that a sale of the Community House property to a private, third-party buyer might lead to development that isn’t consistent with the deed restrictions that it continue to operate as a community center, it said in the court filing, noting that any sale to a non-charitable, private party is expressly prohibited.

The Community House was originally formed in 1927 to promote social, civic and philanthropic activities for the benefit of Birmingham residents. It created a community trust in May 1928 to hold the real estate and executed the deed of trust in 1930, conveying the property it held to a board of trustees.

A 1989 order subsequently terminated the deed of trust and transferred the property to the Community House. The order expressly reaffirmed that the Community House must hold the property in accordance with the terms and conditions of the original 1930 trust, the city said.

Additionally, under the Dissolution of Charitable Purpose Corporations Act, a charitable-purpose corporation may not dissolve, convert, merge or amend its organizational purposes without notice to and the oversight of the Michigan attorney general, the city said.

The Community House’s plan to shift its charitable purpose and liquidate its principal charitable asset constitutes a termination of charitable purposes, the city said, and therefore requires review by the attorney general — who is also a party in the case — and compliance with the deed restrictions.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home