Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space

"A community’s physical form, rather than its land uses, is its most intrinsic and enduring characteristic." [Katz, EPA] This blog focuses on place and placemaking and all that makes it work--historic preservation, urban design, transportation, asset-based community development, arts & cultural development, commercial district revitalization, tourism & destination development, and quality of life advocacy--along with doses of civic engagement and good governance watchdogging.

Sunday, September 23, 2018

Toronto Star "One Toronto" series

The latest installment, "Toronto’s political divide is real, but it can change — especially in the suburbs," argues that the urban/suburban political divide evident in Toronto (and by extension in other metropolitan areas) is more complicated.

Toronto has been roiled for a few decades beginning with the city's amalgamation with some of its suburbs in 1998 -- before then the governments were separate but also cooperative in a metropolitan government which provided some services, then with the Rob Ford mayoralty, and now with the ascension of Rob Ford's brother Doug to Premier of Ontario and his pushing forward legislation to cut the Toronto City Council, on which he briefly served, in half, just a couple months before the election.

Other articles in the series:

-- "Part One: Are Toronto’s elites really downtown? It’s not so simple"
-- "Part Two: People used to move to the suburbs to save money. Now, nearly every corner of Toronto has downtown rent"
-- "Part Three: Toronto is more diverse than ever, but downtown is falling behind"
-- "Part Four: Meet Toronto’s ‘reverse commuters,’ the people going the other way while you’re stuck in traffic"
-- "Part Five: All of Toronto is getting older, but it’s tougher to age in the suburbs< -- "Part Six: Downtown Toronto is becoming like ‘Downton Abbey’ as service workers get pushed farther from the core"

Labels: , , , ,

1 Comments:

At 3:33 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

thanks for the links.

I remember the consolidiation of Metro Toronto being contrasted with Cleveland in the 1980s. In 1971 I’d say Cleveland and Toronto were very much peer cites. Very different fates after.


Toronto being a money center had a great deal to do with the delta.

The series didn’t come off as very insightful. Reminds of reading about gentrification in the post — mostly trying to be politically correct rather than illuminating.

My only sense is the solutions (consolidation) which works 30 years ago doesn’t scale up any further.

No idea on how financing for the amagalgted entity works but I suspect that is a driver for the increase.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home