Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space

"A community’s physical form, rather than its land uses, is its most intrinsic and enduring characteristic." [Katz, EPA] This blog focuses on place and placemaking and all that makes it work--historic preservation, urban design, transportation, asset-based community development, arts & cultural development, commercial district revitalization, tourism & destination development, and quality of life advocacy--along with doses of civic engagement and good governance watchdogging.

Saturday, October 01, 2022

No more housing filtration? (at least in big cities)

Filtration is an old concept in urban planning (also called "ecological succession," "invasion-succession theory," or "concentric zone theory").

I thought from the University of Chicago sociologists in the 1920s, but it actually was first posited in the UK.  

It presumes that people with more money move outward from the core.  As they do so they are replaced by people who on a relative basis, have improved their circumstances compared to lower income deciles.

The Toronto Star reports ("Curse of the renter: In some neighbourhoods, not owning a home now costs more than owning one") that renters there are paying more for housing than housing owners in some parts of the city.  From the article:

Homeowners have long outspent renters in Toronto’s census metropolitan area; a decade ago, their average bills were $1,516 per month versus tenants’ $1,043. That trend is still visible in areas like Toronto’s Little Italy, or a large swath of southwest Brampton.

But over the last decade, the gap has been narrowing. Where owners in all areas spent 45.35 per cent more than tenants in 2011, it fell to 38.84 per cent in 2016, and to 30.28 per cent in 2021.

Statistics Canada has noted a countrywide trend, meanwhile, of renters’ bills climbing faster than homeowners. The average tenant in Canada last year paid 17.6 per cent more than they did in 2016. The average homeowner’s bills increased by 9.5 per cent over that period. 

Toronto is home to some more extreme examples, such as the area between Queen Street and Wright Avenue, from Lansdowne to Sorauren avenues. Here, though owners are still paying several hundred dollars more per month — $2,092 to renters’ $1,790 — renters’ bills are growing much faster. From 2016 to 2021, renters’ average bills went up 48.2 per cent, versus just five per cent for owners.

“It’s quite startling,” Majid said. Generally, the area in and around Parkdale has contended with gentrification, she said, and an increase in housing “financialization” as large companies have come in and purchased older rental apartment blocks as investments. In several cases, those companies have applied for above-guideline rent increases, Majid said, requesting Landlord and Tenant Board permission to charge higher rents for reasons such as major repairs.

If older tenants are pushed out by those costs, she said the rents could surge even higher.
The concept of filtration presumes that older properties remain lower cost.



In today's economy properties are being priced as if they are new, regardless of condition, age, etc.  Maybe it's just about the price per square foot, regardless of condition.


This results in part because an increasing share of the rental housing sector is owned and managed by large firms.

And because demand is greater than supply, especially for comparatively lower cost housing.

An urban planner quoted in the article suggests a greater role for the nonprofit social housing sector as a way to counter constant repricing upward.

-- "Rents are rising everywhere: with continued supply-demand mismatch, shouldn't renter protections be universal? ," 2022

Labels: , , , , , , ,

8 Comments:

At 10:37 AM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

https://www.thestar.com/tr/news/waterloo-region/2022/09/30/displaced-renovictions-harassment-pushing-more-vulnerable-tenants-out-of-kitcheners-inner-suburbs.html

"Displaced: Renovictions, harassment pushing more vulnerable tenants out of Kitchener’s ‘inner suburbs’"

As the financialization of housing expands — and private landlords, small property management firms and larger real estate investment trusts alike all look to increase profits — the report says tenants may choose to, or be forced to, leave because of such things as renovictions, harassment, neglected maintenance and safety issues.

Prior research has often focused on core areas, where gentrification has led to change and displacement.

“We know how affordability works, we see how these forms of displacement and gentrification tend to seep out to surrounding neighbourhoods, but there really is just a lack of research” in these inner suburban areas, said the report’s lead author, Emma McDougall, a PhD candidate in the School of Planning at UW.

“This type of work, it uncovers uncomfortable truths within an era of development equals progress,” said SDCWR executive director and one of the report’s authors, Aleksandra Petrovic.

http://www.waterlooregion.org/new-study-displacement-in-kitchener%E2%80%99s-inner-suburbs

 
At 5:10 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

The Washington Post: 'Build-to-rent' homes offer a new option, though critics say they fuel inequality.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/10/02/housing-build-to-rent-austin/

 
At 7:53 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

The Wall Street Journal: Home Builders Offer to Sell Homes in Bulk at Discount to Investors.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/home-builders-offer-to-sell-homes-in-bulk-at-discount-to-investors-11664789404?mod=flipboard

 
At 11:52 AM, Anonymous charlie said...

Yeah I saw that WSJ piece this morning.

I think there are three ways to approach this.

1. Financialization. Housing is an asset class. Yes as you get more corporate landlords versus private one that become more obivious in terms of pricing. However, as that WSJ piece alludes to it only makes sense because:

2) Cost of Money; driving down the cost of money since 2008 has enabled this behavior. Otherwise "housing as an asset class" makes a lot less sense. It also makes it impossible to save.

To give you an idea, our condo reserves have gone from around 5000 in 2013 to well over 150,000 today. But we are missing out around 50K in earned interest. Again if we have bought stocks/bitcoin/whatever in 2013 that would be different, but money like that is ultra conservative and hard to invest in things other than banks.

Larger point is cost of money cuts two ways.


3) expectations.

$1100 a month for a crappy 300 sf apartment in 2012 was was was already considered highly overpriced. That wasn't heaven, but it looks better compared to today and your expectations.

Looking at the GTA featured couple, looks like they make about $100,000 C in household income. Decent lifestyle.

Again, in the DC metro we have tons of home at price points like this is very unfashionable places -- say Springfield, or past Dulles.

GTA is probably different, and of course the received wisdom is 80% of new multifamily in Toronto is condo versus rental (opposite of US).

 
At 12:05 PM, Anonymous charlie said...

Maybe another way to think about it is inflation regimes.

Inflation isn't price increases. It's a way of life -- because price changes start to filter down into everything.

We are switching from a low inflation regime to a medium or high one.

The financial case for buying a house isn't speculation or 5x returns. Or even flipping.

It's preventing inflation for getting into the cost of shelter.

We are now seeing what medium inflation regimes look like.

And the bottom 50% get killed.

 
At 2:28 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

Deep stuff. I'll have to read this a couple times.

I haven't read it yet but Tooze has a piece in the Times about moving into a deflationary period. And yes cheap money allowed Wall Street to get in on housing in a sectoral way, abetted by 2008's crash.

 
At 9:29 AM, Anonymous charlie said...

Tooze would say we finally say the power of fiscal spending, it's benefitting the lower 50% of society, and inflation scaring (what I just did) is a way for power of capital to reassert itself over labor.


Hence the "deflationary" regime talk from him when he is trying to say "we are going to spend a lot less government money"

I'm not even going to address the role interest rates play in that -- and how much more you are costing the government.

We're projected to have $1 Trillion dollar deficits for the next 10 years. Not much fiscal reduction in my book.

Inflation, as a regime, is not something most people have thought about since 1981 and it's easy to forget that like the future, it isn't evenly balanced. Some groups do well, others not so much. I haven't seen a raise in 2 years.



 
At 4:01 PM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

Re: if you already have housing, you're in a much better position than people who don't.

https://www.ocregister.com/2022/10/02/home-sharing-backyard-cottages-and-renting-out-rooms-help-seniors-find-housing-solutions

"Home sharing, backyard cottages and renting out rooms help seniors find housing"
As our population ages, shelter will be a tricky issue. Some solutions are more fun than others.

The non-profit Affordable Living for the Aging Home Share program has been around since 1978, finding roommates for about 2,500 senior Angelenos over the past four decades.

The average age of home providers is 75, while home seekers average 65 years old. The average rent is $600 a month, and arrangements can include a combination of rent and tasks like cooking, cleaning or transportation.

“Home providers who could use extra income in order to make ends meet … or who need assistance with light household tasks, and companionship, can be matched with roommates to provide that gap in services and help the homeowner remain living in place,” said ALA Home Share Director Miriam Hall. “Housing seekers benefit because they are securing housing in their price range when there are really no other options.”

 

Post a Comment

<< Home