National Trails Day: Saturday June 6th
The first Saturday of June is National Trails Day. I think that it should be leveraged to promote trail use, volunteerism wrt cleanups, as a day to celebrate opening new trails, facilities, etc. ("Thousands of volunteers help maintain WA trails each year," Seattle Times).
Too often it isn't.
The American Hiking Society is the lead, but federal agencies, at least they used to, like the National Park Service and the US Forest Service were big celebrants.
Biking and walking access is a big part of trails and Trails Day events.
US Forest Service lands are free access on Trails Day. They have a lot of volunteer and other events that day, all over the country.
National Parks aren't free that day.
1. Last month, while doing park playground evaluation for a grant application, I realized besides most places not having enough signage calling attention to trails, that trail signage could be augmented with information/icons pointing people to nearby services like restrooms or air pumps--bike maps often do this, but not signs.
2. Years ago, I was blown away by a trail study for Cuyahoga County (Cleveland) Ohio (Cuyahoga Greenways Plan) that did demographic studies about the increased range of jobs made available through the expansion of trail networks.
I haven't stayed in close touch with bike planning best practice over the past few years, but I think this plan is definitely worth reading in terms of how it lays out goals and evaluation criteria for route selection, and even branding!
3. The basic idea is building a network for cycling. I like the way an old German National Bicycle Plan illustrated the point.- within neighborhoods
- one mile radius from schools and bus stops and transit stations
- three mile radius from "town centers"
- along corridors
- between corridors
- connections within and to parks, which I called a County bikeway network
- connections to neighboring jurisdictions (Baltimore County has borders with Baltimore City, Anne Arundel County, Howard County, Carroll County and Harford County in Maryland, and York County in Pennsylvania.
In Chicago, the Wolf and Company restaurant is the first company to have placed a restaurant entry on the 606 Trail.
So Wolf & Company is three concepts: cafe; restaurant and bar; and upscale market, in one, connecting both to the 606 Trail and the Bucktown neighborhood.
8. the biggest issue in bicycle planning to me is not the development, construction and implementation of infrastructure and facilities, but providing the assistance people need to make the transition from automobile-centricity to biking.
I write about that here:
-- "Revisiting assistance programs to get people biking: 26 programs"
9. Secure bicycle parking networks operating at the metropolitan scale. But while #24 is Provision of secure bicycle parking, and lockers and showers in destination districts. Zoning requirements to build them in office buildings and campuses of a certain size. Or as a proffer/ community benefit.
I failed to call out specifically the need for secure bicycle parking networks. That means 27 points. This covers the topic:
-- "If you're going to promote electric bikes at scale, there needs to be complementary investment in secure bicycle parking and charging" (2023)
-- "Bike to Work Day as an opportunity to assess the state of bicycle planning: Part 2, building a network of bike facilities at the regional scale" (2017)
Rennes, France does a good job with regional secure bike parking ("National Bicycle Month | Rennes, France: a national model"). Other European cities too.
10. E-bikes can help a lot. Years ago I was critical about e-biking, because I thought "regular" bikes worked in cities--especially in flat areas--just fine ("(Still) tired of mis-understanding of the potential for e-bikes."
E-bikes have the added benefit of
- extending the distance people are willing to commute by bike
- making it easier for aging seniors to continue biking
- making it easier to bike in hilly conditions
- making a bicycle trip more competitive with car travel in terms of time, so that people actually switch trips from a car to a bike.
11. Making cycling irresistible. But my earlier position on "the right way to use electric bikes" made me remember job isn't to make plans about how I think people should bike. It should be about building the conditions to make bicycling irresistible
-- "Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany," Transport Reviews (2008).
I used that paper as the foundation for this piece, which was commissioned at the time by the DC Bicycle Advisory Committee in response to a Rails to Trails Conservancy initiative.
-- "Ideas for making bicycling irresistible in Washington DC" (2008)
In writing, I made the point that DC is urban and should lay out an urban agenda for biking, as opposed to the more suburban and rural biking "sense" of the rails to trails movement.
Anyone who regularly uses Iowa City trails has likely seen the tension already developing: riders moving too quickly through crowded pedestrian areas, oversized throttle-powered bikes built more like motorcycles than bicycles, and parents purchasing machines online without realizing they may exceed Iowa’s legal definition of an e-bike.
That matters because Iowa City has spent decades building trails designed to function as shared public spaces. Pedestrians, runners, wheelchair users, cyclists and families with strollers all use the same network. That system works because speed differences remain relatively manageable and predictable. A 12 mph difference matters on a crowded trail. A 30 mph difference changes the character of a shared trail completely.Unfortunately, the public conversation often collapses into two extremes. Either all e-bikes are treated as dangerous, or any discussion of regulation is dismissed as anti-bike hysteria. Both reactions miss the point. Most e-bike riders are responsible, and many are exactly the kind of people cities should want out of cars and onto trails. E-bikes reduce traffic, parking demand, and transportation barriers for people who might not otherwise ride at all. At the same time, it is reasonable to acknowledge that high-speed electric motorcycles do not belong on crowded recreational paths simply because they have pedals attached.
Labels: bicycle and pedestrian planning, global warming and climate change, heat, parks and open space, parks and trails, parks planning, public lands, public realm framework, sustainable mobility, urban design/placemaking


.jpg)
.jpg)












0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home