Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space

"A community’s physical form, rather than its land uses, is its most intrinsic and enduring characteristic." [Katz, EPA] This blog focuses on place and placemaking and all that makes it work--historic preservation, urban design, transportation, asset-based community development, arts & cultural development, commercial district revitalization, tourism & destination development, and quality of life advocacy--along with doses of civic engagement and good governance watchdogging.

Thursday, February 07, 2013

Investment vs. spending and DC's fiscal surplus: how about funding big, visionary projects

So DC has a $414 million surplus (partly because we won't spend money on where it needs to be spent, partly for other reasons).  See "D.C. budget surplus should be saved, mayor says" from WJLA-TV.

Some DC elected officials want all of it to be put in the bank.

Mayor Gray has announced a willingness to invest $100 million in affordable housing ("Gray pushes affordable housing, pay raises" from the Washington Examiner).

I would argue that besides investing in "affordable housing" the city should do other targeted investment on items that are really really really really really important, but that the city doesn't appear to be addressing at all.

The point of investment is to "spend" money on items that are structural and have long term positive economic return.

Spending is disbursing money on items that have little long term impact, tend to not be about structural change, and have little if any economic return.

I can think of at least five items that qualify, although it would be a lot easier if the city had a public capital improvements budgeting process and program.  (Most jurisdictions do this on a 6 year time frame, on a two year running plan.  DC does something like this in the Chief Financial Officer's shop, but it's not a public process.)

1.  Re-constructing the Georgia Avenue-Missouri Avenue intersection.  
Georgia Avenue-Missouri Avenue intersection
This came up in the "Walmart" report process I co-chaired for ANC4B (ANC4B Large Tract Review Report on Walmart, 5/2011, "Temper Walmart Glee with Planning," op-ed, Washington Business Journal).  That intersection has an offset geometry from when the road was created in the 1860s and it has never been "corrected."  Riggs Road-Missouri Avenue-Military Road is the only through east-west arterial in Upper Northwest (and the only through east-west arterial other than Michigan Avenue-Columbia, which is in "Middle" Northwest).

The intersection will only get worse as Upper Georgia Avenue gets redevelopment in this segment, from Missouri Avenue--the city's first Walmart will be opening up at this intersection--to at least the Walter Reed Army Medical Center complex, which has been deaccessioned, with 60+ acres going to DC for redevelopment into office, retail, and housing + various nonprofit uses (like charter schools) and 30+ acres (I think) for embassies.  Other land use intensification opportunities exist along this corridor.

Now DDOT barely raised the issue of this intersection in their response to Walmart, but then DDOT was basically ordered by the city's elected officials, to make the project happen, not to mitigate the potential problems or come up with expensive projects to fix real, fundamental long term problems.

The ANC report mentioned that one option would be to build a circle and underground Missouri Avenue.

2.  Create a massive economic, education, health, and social improvement initiative for Wards 7 and 8.

Sometime this year I will be writing a series of pieces on how a type of Harlem Children's Zone initiative needs to be created, like the Promise Neighborhood Initiative in Kenilworth-Parkside but much much much much much bigger, with a focus not just on children, but everything.

This would cost a lot of money--every year, not just as a one time expense.

But think of it this way.  The city probably spends in direct costs in and as a result of these two wards between $1 Billion and $2 Billion !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! annually (on education, health care, uncompensated health care, police services, fire department, emergency medical services, the court, legal, and incarceration system, youth services including incarceration, social work, etc.) without seeing much in the way of "return on investment" leading to positive structural change in the community and for individuals and families.

3. Dealing in a concerted manner ("war on abandominiums") with the Abandominium crisis East of the River.
Problem Property Audit, page 1 - University of Memphis
This should be seen as a separate and inter-linked element with the previous item.

So there was a great piece in GGW ("Abandominiums house Anacostia resentment") about widespread multiunit housing abandonment East of the River. My response was this entry "Deeper thinking/programming on weak residential housing markets is required: DC example, Anacostia," which laid out a program on how to deal with it.

While I don't think that widespread blight justifies violence (Post columnist Courtland Milloy wrote that it does, at least with regard to Metrobuses traveling through the neighborhood, see "At a hearing on why kids throw stones at Metro buses, no one spoke for the kids") clearly it contributes to it, anomie, etc., and it becomes a reinforcing negative force leading to further decline.

Make this a priority. Fund it. Make it happen. Improve the neighborhood.

4.  Reconstructing other similar intersections/restoring lost circles/creating squares, etc.
Connecticut Avenue underpass between Dupont Circle (north side) and Q Street NW
The blog has discussed this ("It's time for a new "city beautiful" movement in DC," "Decking over I-395 should just be the beginning," "Public Squares and DC") with regard to Truxton Circle, Dupont Circle (pictured above), Scott Circle, and restoring the wide sidewalks in the Cleveland Park commercial district.

Using surplus monies for doing such projects makes a lot of sense to me.

5.  Allocate money for planning, design, and engineering for the Separated Blue Line.
Proposed changes for the WMATA system, 2001 (separated blue line)
I write about this all the time, so I won't repeat myself...

Just do it.  Start the process.  Had it been done 11 years ago, it would be opening up in a couple years...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,


At 8:16 AM, Anonymous charlie said...

That's an interesting estimate of costs EOTR. I'd guess it account for about 10% of revenue as well. (low real estate, high unemployment, little retail, and lower incomes)

Decking over North Capitol would also be a wise investment.

It's amazing that DC can find 600M to build a new stadium (and dedidicated taxes to build it) and can't figure out some of the stuff you mention.

At 9:50 AM, Anonymous rg said...

I know I sound like a broken record, but it astounds me that DC's elected officials do not have a laser-like focus on transit in general and transit expansion more specifically. DC's strength versus its regional competitors is its transit system combined with its urban fabric. Mission number one should be to increase the capacity of the existing system (SEPARATED BLUE LINE ASAP!!) and the construction of of an intra-DC network, with connections to the suburbs where it makes sense (Silver Spring, Rosslyn, out RI Ave, etc.). It can be done. It is being done in cities located in countries that are much less affluent than we are. It is being done in cities in countries that are as affluent as we are. The only thing missing is leadership from our elected officials, who generally say the right things about transit but don't really seem to be able to grasp how important maintaining and expanding our transit system is to the District's future. I think it boils down to the fact that most of them never use the system. I guarantee none of them know firsthand about the rush hour capacity constraints at Metro Center and Gallery Place and are only vaguely familiar with the crisis on many of the District's busiest bus lines. (I took the S bus at rush house a few weeks ago, something I had not done in a long time. What a complete and utter disaster! A city serious about its transit network would have long ago looked at taking 1.5 lanes of 16th Street and dedicating them to a high-capacity tramway like those in French and German cities. And yes, all you need is 1.5 lanes -- trams, unlike buses, cannot swerve into each other, so the parallel tracks can be really close to one another.)

At 12:49 PM, Anonymous Richard Layman said...

When I get home, Charlie I'll add your N. Capitol point... (I had another idea on my ride into the city but sadly, I've already forgotten it.)

and rg, I'll mention in a separate entry an advocacy project I learned about in Chicago, that is relevant to your great points.

At 3:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

RG is spot on of course- as usual- but there is still a huge push from 1960's activist liberals in the DC gov't to blow all of the surplus on public housing, methadone clinics, homeless shelters and work programs for kids who probably live in PG and are just using their grandparents addresses so they can take advantage of the largesse and naive taxpayers in DC....sorry but I am cynical having lived here my whole life. Change can happen and sometimes does- but the idiots always seem to prevail

At 7:47 AM, Blogger Richard Layman said...

Still behind on the rewrite, I forgot to mention gen'l planning.

And CHarlie, wrt North Cap. I remember now the idea I had, which is the tunneling of North Cap. for through traffic. I hate to suggest this idea generally, but the impact of commuter traffic on quality of life of the abutting neighborhoods probably justifies this.


Post a Comment

<< Home