Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space

"A community’s physical form, rather than its land uses, is its most intrinsic and enduring characteristic." [Katz, EPA] This blog focuses on place and placemaking and all that makes it work--historic preservation, urban design, transportation, asset-based community development, arts & cultural development, commercial district revitalization, tourism & destination development, and quality of life advocacy--along with doses of civic engagement and good governance watchdogging.

Sunday, April 01, 2018

Working capital loans through crowdfunding

A record store, Exile on Main Street in Champaign, Illinois, lacking enough money to buy inventory for "Record Store Day," a nationally coordinated shopping promotion for independent record stores--this year it's on April 21st-- has set up a crowdfunding program to help them buy inventory, because they don't generate enough sales to put money aside for particularly large purchases of stock ("Exile on Main Street launches GoFundMe to save their Record Store Day," Smile Politely).

The funds are treated as store credit, not donations.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Condo project in San Diego reduces parking in response to financiers

San Diego:  A 37-story condo or apartment tower would dominate the Ballpark Village project approved for the block bounded by Park Boulevard and Imperial and 12th avenues. — Carrier Johnson + Culture

 The issue of how much parking to provide in urban buildings is very contentious.  Because in the US the automobile is the dominant transportation, people have a hard time dealing with what we might call outliers, or those places where the automobile isn't dominant, where people walk, bike or use transit and drive less.

A few cities, notably San Francisco and Seattle, have for many years eliminated parking requirements in their core.  Spreading these practices to more cities, such as DC, has been very contentious, as residents in the more suburban parts of the city come out in force to oppose such recommendations ("DC as a suburban agenda dominated city").

The San Diego Union-Tribune has an interesting article, "Ballpark Village project OKd: Apartments or condos in $250m project still undecided," about a project to be built next to the Petco Field baseball stadium in Downtown San Diego.  In the most the current iteration, they're planning to provide 1/6 fewer parking spaces compared to previous plans.  The building will have 688 units of housing.  From the article:
Another point of contention was the reduction in parking spaces planned. Earlier plans called for 1,175 spaces on three levels and now that's been revised down to 942 on two levels -- still higher than the downtown zoning ordinance requires. 

Chatfield said the change was in response to potential financiers who thought a third underground level would not be popular with residents and argued that downtowners, especially the young, don't drive as much as in the past.
Morgan, a former downtown resident, said she backs less parking in light of the increased use of car sharing and interest in mass transit, biking and walking.
It's not a huge reduction but it is a reduction that is not insignificant.  

It's somewhat astounding because in past experience, it is mostly the financing community (along with automobile-enamored residents) that has pushed providing lots of parking/as much parking as possible, even in very urban settings.

Now, judging by this project at least, it seems as if some financing entities see that reducing parking in those locations where parking is less likely to be needed.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, January 02, 2013

Avis to buy Zipcar

Screen image, Iphone application for ZipcarGiven the success of car sharing in the DC-area, with Flexcar, later acquired by Zipcar, and Zipcar, plus the more recent entry of car sharing operations by Enterprise and Hertz into DC, plus the even more recent entry of the one-way car sharing service, Car2Go, DC must be a hotbed of carsharing in the U.S.

The one thing we don't have in DC is a nonprofit car sharing organization like they do in San Francisco, City Car Share, Philly Car Share in Philadelphia or  in Montreal, Communauto.  The disadvantage that nonprofit car share organizations have is having to raise capital for purchasing vehicles, especially when they have to replace the original fleet.

So that Avis, a major car rental company, is purchasing Zipcar, is quite interesting in what it communicates about car usage as an application or service (see writings on "product service systems" among other things).

See the Associated Press story, "Avis buying Zipcar in deal worth nearly $500M."  Also see "Why the 49% premium Avis paid for Zipcar is a bargain" from Quartz, "Zipcar and the Death of Entrepreneurship" from LinkedIn and "Zipcar: Entrepreneurial Genius, Public-Company Failure" from the Wall Street Journal. (Thanks to Notions Capital for the heads up on the latter articles.)

Note that while I know you can use Zipcars in other North American cities, I didn't realize that they have coverage in some UK cities including London and Barcelona through their acquisition of Avancar (press release).  And apparently the same Zipcar infrastructure works between the systems.  Of course, I've yet to test it out.

I don't think there will be many changes.  The article suggests that the Avis fleet can be used by Zipcar members during peak demand periods.  I don't expect that will happen any time soon as it will require a variety of changes to how Avis manages their cars, plus most of their car rental locations are not in those kinds of places where car share members are likely to be living.

-----
WRT the articles by Dennis Berman about "the death of entrepreneurship," this is an issue, but not in the way that he thinks, at least not to me. The problem has to do with scale and operating in multiple cities and scales. It's a similar process to how in many markets (especially in retail and increasing in retail development, at least in the major metropolitan areas) local operators have been supplanted by national firms. In select markets that are more engaged as part of the global economy, such as the real estate market in major cities like NYC, DC, San Francisco, Seattle, Los Angeles, etc., international developers and financiers may trump even national actors.

It becomes very difficult for comparatively small companies to operate in multiple cities and get access to the necessary capital to build and expand their business. (This by the way is an issue faced by my own business, BicyclePASS. I know how we can position ourselves to be a major force nationally. Capital is a key element in our ability to expand. And patient capital--because in start up phases you lose money, you don't make money--is especially hard to find.)

Labels: , , , , ,