Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space

"A community’s physical form, rather than its land uses, is its most intrinsic and enduring characteristic." [Katz, EPA] This blog focuses on place and placemaking and all that makes it work--historic preservation, urban design, transportation, asset-based community development, arts & cultural development, commercial district revitalization, tourism & destination development, and quality of life advocacy--along with doses of civic engagement and good governance watchdogging.

Monday, October 06, 2025

Definition of insanity, National Parks/federal government shutdown

One definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results.

=========

For almost 15 years, I've written entries about how local governments need to do scenario planning vis a vis state and federal government installations in their cities, similarly states vis a vis the federal government.

This was spurred by federal government shutdowns leading to the closure of national parks, the impact on states and local governments, and their plaintive calls for opening the parks.  But also because of the impact on parks in DC, where the National Park Service runs a majority of the city's parks.

-- "Contingency planning in parks planning: Montgomery County Maryland edition," 2013
-- "Federal shutdown as another example of why local jurisdictions should have more robust contingency and master planning processes," 2013

This comes up with the SF Chronicle article, "Tourists from around the world blindsided by Muir Woods closure."

On any given year, Muir Woods National Monument draws hundreds of thousands of visitors from all over the world to take in the pristine views, trails and wildlife that make up one of the last ancient redwood forests left in the Bay Area.

On Wednesday, however, tourists were greeted by an unexpected sight at the entrance: a sign informing them the Marin County park was “closed due to a lapse in appropriations” after the federal government shutdown went into effect at 12:01 that morning. A ranger on duty stood in front of a growing line of cars and tried to offer alternative nearby parks for them to visit, but there was no way around the disappointment. The reservations many of the visitors had booked months in advance had been cancelled.

The thing is, there is a system where states (or local) governments can pay to keep parks open.

It's not like this hasn't happened before.

Tourists might be blindsided by this.  Local and state governments have no excuse.

Just like in 2013, the State of Utah is stepping in to fund national parks ("Utah will fund national parks amid government shutdown. Here’s what it will keep open," Salt Lake Tribune).  

Visitors may have better luck accessing information soon, though. The state of Utah is stepping in to keep national parks open, including visitor centers, which act as central hubs of information.

The Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity is dedicating funds to cover visitor center costs in Utah’s five national parks, as well as Cedar Breaks National Monument, according to a Friday news release. “Utah’s National Parks will remain open,” said Natalie Randall, director of the Utah Office of Tourism and Film. “We are committed to supporting visitors in planning and preparing for their best trip to Utah, preserving our parks, and ensuring Utah communities and businesses that rely on national park visitation are supported.”

The National Park Service has estimated that it costs $8,000 per day to operate visitor centers at Utah’s five national parks and Cedar Breaks National Monument, according to a statement from Randall. “This is a fiscally responsible decision and we will continue to evaluate, as national parks visitor centers serve as an essential hub for visitor safety, sanitation, and public security,” she said.

Not California.

According to the SLT article, the daily cost to keep multiple parks open isn't very much.  So there isn't really an excuse except for lack of planning.

Note that the Republicans understand that closing parks is bad for them, given how "front facing" they are as public assets and places where citizens go to recreate.  So they try to keep them open, skating on the law ("National Parks Told to Remain Open During Shutdown Despite Risks," Bloomberg).

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Friday, September 26, 2025

Gaps in Parks Master Planning: Part Ten | Park transportational access

In 2024 I wrote a series of articles on Gaps in Park Master Planning, based on my experience sitting on a park board in Salt Lake City, with interesting inter-governmental relationships in that the park is jointly owned by the city and county, overseen by an independent board--as a kind of proto parks conservancy (like Central Park in New York City) but never with the investment or effort to develop the conservancy element ("Creating a Park Conservancy that Fits," Parks & Recreation).  My work on various projects in DC as well as on the Eastern Market public market board prepared me well for these issues.


But while I have written a bunch about parks and transportational access, I didn't think to include that as another topic in the series.  The challenge is to ensure that as many parks as possible are accessible by transit.  This, and other forms of accessibility, should be covered in a parks master plan.


Toronto Star article, "When it comes to public spaces, like High Park and the Islands, access shouldn’t be a hurdle," reminds me that I have written about parks access issues for a decade or more, that I am dealing with it specifically for Sugar House Park (a project that is likely to take at least six years, and I hope it will include artistic intersection treatment, plant-related transit shelters, and median plantings, alongside a park-side bicycle lane and road dieting--taking one lane of the major east-west street abutting the park), and that this is definitely a gap in parks master planning, tricky because the access points are usually under the jurisdiction of local and state highway-transportation departments.


The article goes on to discuss High Park, where the city made a bunch of controversial changes making car access and parking more difficult ("High Park car ban: Can the city's changes ease the anger?").  From the article:
One year later, critics say that while the city moved quickly to close the park to vehicles, it hasn’t followed through with timely supports for people with mobility challenges, who can’t walk in from the perimeter, access the shuttle that runs from High Park subway station, or use the trackless train that runs through the park, but is not wheelchair accessible.
(Note this comes up with Sugar House Park too.  But it's a county park, and the Salt Lake Valley is the epitome of sprawl.  A car free park would significantly reduce participation.  Making the park car free just seems like picking at a scab.  Although I hope to start a program of weekend "Open Streets" over the course of the year.)

Goals.

First is the issue of physical access.  Is it easy to get to a park by walking, transit, trails, or car?  Most park access planning is focused on the car.  

Second is the issue of equity. When you require a car to access a park that this triggers equity concerns, and transit (and transit fare assistance) should be provided.  

Third, city park access on the perimeter may need greater focus.  For a "regular" city or county, the traditional transit system can suffice.  E.g., in Salt Lake City, most major parks are accessible via regular bus routes, although this access isn't necessarily well integrated into the park.

Sugar House Park, 1300 East.

Fourth, it's important to plan for seasonality, specifically winter, for city parks and trails, and snow clearance ("Gaps in Parks Master Planning: Part Four | Planning for Seasonality and Activation").  People use parks in winter.  So snow clearance may be an important issue, but may often be ignored.  Also in the early morning and evening when light diminishes.

Elements.


Railroad tourism to large national parks
"out west" was the foundation of recreational passenger service.  It set the stage for park tourism, in both the US and Canada.  While many of Canada's parks still have train service, with US national parks it's hit or miss.  Except for a couple of private rail services focused on high end service and access.

Access.  Like with Toronto's park islands in Lake Ontario, the past blog entry "Revisiting: Access to Theodore Roosevelt Island, a national park in Washington, DC," discusses how a park in the Potomac River can only be accessed by a bridge from Virginia.  Ferry service from DC isn't provided.

Zion National Park shuttle bus.  Flickr photo by SoCal Metro.

National Parks
.  The National Park Service does have a Transportation program, focused on reducing traffic congestion, visitor management, and preservation of natural areas within parks--the parks would be overwhelmed if people only used cars to get around within a park.

But generally these services are offered within parks, not to parks.  

Forests.  The USFS is much less developed on this element.  While many USFS sites are remote, a number are not, with major forests near or in major metropolitan areas like Atlanta, Los Angeles, and Salt Lake City, or other cities and tourist destinations like Sedona (USFS Urban National Forests).  

Pasadena is piloting a transit shuttle to the Angeles National Forest ("Urban Transit to Trails: Mt. Wilson Express Shuttle") with support from the federal park transportation access program.

Traffic congestion at Yellowstone National Park.

Dams and Fish and Wildlife installations.  Almost by definition these won't be accessible because they tend to be located far from cities.  Although local transit systems may provide service.  A fish and wildlife site in Metro Detroit is accessible by bus ("North America’s only international wildlife refuge is on the Detroit River. Visit by bus," Bridge Detroit).

Trailhead Direct transit shuttle, King County.

Local and state parks.  However, many parks are accessible through regular transit services, or special, usually seasonal park-focused transit such as in King County, Washington ("Yes, hiking. No, traffic. Trailhead Direct offers car-free travel from Seattle to the mountains," KUOW/NPR), Los Angeles County, Boulder, Sedona, etc.

Colorado's Bustang state supported inter-city bus service provides access to some state and national parks.

Salt Lake County.  The County is home to the Wasatch section of the Uintah-Wasatch-Cache National Forest but isn't accessible by transit.  

There is an exception with SkiBus (constantly being reduced because of lack of drivers) and some service in Big Cottonwood Canyon.  I've proposed the creation of what I call the Salt Lake County Recreational Transit District to provide such services.  

Park City Transit bus.

Resort communities.  Many resort communities across North America have transit services.  As a transportation demand management program, they are often free to use, to encourage both employees and visitors to ride.

For example, Park City and Summit County in Utah.  Summit County's High Valley Transit has even stepped in and replaced a service between Salt Lake City and Park City, that UTA said they couldn't provide.  Since HVT is free, so is bus route, which used to cost $5 each way.

With the support of Colorado DOT, Amtrak service runs from Denver to Winter Haven during ski season.  The Cuyahoga Scenic Railroad provides for bike access to the Cuyahoga Falls National Park.  Amtrak provides access to the Great Allegheny Passage Trail too, among others.

Water access.  A new 10-year plan to reduce traffic and improve safety and accessibility on Belle Isle calls for, among other things, bringing ferry service back to the island park and Detroit River ("Belle Isle’s 10-year mobility plan could see return of ferry service," Crain's Detroit Business). Nearer term, recommendations for two-way bicycle lanes circling the island, completion of the Ralph C. Wilson Jr. Centennial Trail and new wayfinding signs to help visitors find their way around are set to happen this year.


As mentioned above, Roosevelt Island in the Potomac River is not accessible from the DC side, only from Virginia.  This can be typical for parks in rivers.  

NPS does have some water transit access services, as do some localities, like Toronto and a ferry to Toronto Island Park, even if it is substandard ("Toronto's public spaces need results – not more plans," Toronto Globe & Mail).  Governors Island from New York City has a well regarded ferry service.

The National Park Service also supports "water trails," trails organized to connect parks, for people using waterborne vessels.

Trails.  Ideally, trail connections to parks are part of a broader system of regional trails.  Many cities and states have trail systems linking parks such as Philadelphia's Circuit Trails.  Akron, Ohio is a hub for three different trails, the Ohio and Erie Canal Towpath Trail, and the Freedom and Buckeye Trails.  The Great Allegheny Passage trail connects Pittsburgh to Washington, DC, partly via the C&O Canal National Park.  GAP has a Trail Towns economic development program to assist local communities with building bike tourism.

Increasingly, provision of trails within and to and from parks is less of an an issue.  If anything, trail access to parks is a high priority. Some parks have trail systems within a park as well.  The east coast Appalachian Trail and the west coast Pacific Coast Trail run along the entire coast of the US, and include both national and state parks on their routes. 

Access at Parks.

Parking.  While the point of this entry is facilitating non-motor vehicle access to parks, parking planning is a necessary element to accommodate users in ways that protect natural resources and other park users.  National and state parks usually charge a fee per vehicle.  Some regional parks in various jurisdictions, as well as beaches often charge for parking.  

Tillamook County, Oregon charges a parking fee at many of its parks and boat launches--$10/day or $55/year.

Sidewalks, intersection crossings, etc.  Does the park perimeter have a sidewalk?  Is the park accessible from nearby streets? 

Indianapolis Cultural Trail.

Are primary intersections into the park properly signalized and safe?  Are there opportunities for special entrance treatments incorporating artistic elements more generally or park specific?


Americans for Disabilities Act
.  Similarly, the park has ADA issues, and those continue to be addressed, limited by our budget and planning resources.

Salt Lake City did an ADA access plan for its parks and public buildings (ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan). 

More parks are taking care to provide ADA accessible trails and special mobility equipment to access them ("Building An Inclusive Park System For All Abilities," NY State Parks, Tillamook County, Oregon).

Intra-park mobility.  Most local and state parks have some issues where mobility access is inadequate in some way.

Sugar House Park has a biking and walking path as part of the street right of way.  It's less likely to vulnerability because the street ROW is one way--although that doesn't prevent wrong way driving or other mistakes.


But perhaps this could be separated from the road by being slightly elevated, in terms of its own paths.

Montreal.

Bicycle parking at a playground in Liberty Park, Salt Lake City.

Bicycling.  
Bicycle parking, access to repair equipment, air, and perhaps electric charging for bicycles are park planning issues.  In terms of bicycle parking, providing secure parking for all types of bicycles, including cargo bikes and electric bikes, should be a part of the planning process. 

Access to bicycles is partly an equity issue.  Many parks have bicycle rental concessions. But that costs money. 

Bicycle sharing programs.  The original Tulsa Townies bicycle sharing system was designed to provide free bike use within Tulsa's Riverfront parks, although it is no longer in operation. Connecting four parks, Bismarck North Dakota has a park-based bicycle sharing system that is free to use.  Cities with widespread bicycle sharing programs provide bike sharing access naturally, although I am not familiar with any programs that provide free access for park users.

Bicycle sharing bikes on the National Mall in Washington, DC.

Wayfinding and cultural interpretation signage.  Directional signage for trails can be inadequate, forcing reliance on online sources, which some of us prefer not to use.

This can be an issue with statewide trails, regional trails like the Denver & Rio Grande Trail in Davis County, Utah ("Denver and Rio Grande Rail Trail in Davis County, Utah: a great foundation, full of (missed) opportunity") and local trails.

It's also nice to have cultural interpretation signage along the way, about local history, waterways and other topics.

Many years ago, the Passaic County NJ Transportation Plan included an element on historic interpretation of transportation infrastructure within the county, including rivers and canals.
  
Programming
.  Programs to promote bicycling and walking should be part of parks master planning too.  Community cycling rides, training programs for children, supported walks, etc., are some of the programs that could be offered.

Some parks do close streets ("Open Streets" programs) disallowing motor vehicles for special events and weekends.  This is especially true overseas.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, October 02, 2024

Change takes a long time: Parks edition

Today we had a ribbon cutting for the new Fabian Lakeside Pavilion at Sugar House Park in Salt Lake, where I am on the board.  One of seven pavilions, they are about 60 years old.  The Park is about 70 years old, a regional park, and unusually, owned by the City and County jointly but overseen by an independent board.

The pavilion project is interesting for a bunch of reasons:

  • the original pavilion study dates to 2016.  So it took 8 years to construct the first new pavilion.
  • the park, being jointly owned by the city and county, has interesting problems with capital funding, as the agreement calls for joint and equal funding, leading to lots of paper and accounting issues.
  • But the two different governments work on different Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) schedules and only last year did I figure out how to make the two separate processes congruent--for our purposes, the equivalent of one process
  • the city started putting money aside for this pavilion 4-5 years ago.  The county a bit more recently.  
  • the original design for the pavilion was very modern and execrable (a lot of architecture firms aren't interesting in referencing architectural history).
The latter made me blow up the meeting and we had a special session later where we worked out a style that was a bit more balanced, with some cues to historic park architecture.

After the board meeting, I happened to go to a conference with a session on historic park architecture, featuring buildings and structures of the US Forest Service, and I ended up writing a long paper about park architectural history.

And I realized for the first time that most park system master plans fail to discuss park architecture generally, let alone park architectural history ("I discovered a massive omission in local parks master planning: it fails to discuss architecture and design in an overt way," 2023).  Which dates to the late 1800s with railroads creating lodges to serve the large western national parks.  This approach to design was continued by the National Park Service when it was created in 1916 ("parkitecture"), and was updated in the 1950s for modernism.

For various reasons, state and local park systems tended to adopt this approach, abetted by the New Deal, when many state and local parks were built by various federal government works programs, using design guidelines developed by the National Park Service as the lead, but also the US Forest Service.  (Other federal agencies like BLM use the same guidelines.)

This issue was one that inspired my series of articles on gaps in park master planning:

-- "Gaps in Parks Master Planning: Part One | Levels of Service"
-- "Gaps in Parks Master Planning: Part Two | Utilizing Academic Research as Guidance"
-- "Gaps in Parks Master Planning: Part Three | Planning for Climate Change/Environment"
-- "Gaps in Parks Master Planning: Part Four | Planning for Seasonality and Activation"
-- "Gaps in Parks Master Planning: Part Five | Planning for Public Art as an element of park facilities"
-- "Gaps in Parks Master Planning, Part Six | Art(s) in the Park(s) as a comprehensive program "
-- "Gaps in Parks Master Planning: Part Seven | Park Architectural (and Landscape Design) History
-- "Gaps in Parks Master Planning: Part Eight | Civic Engagement"

and specifically with architecture and the cultural landscape (""Gaps in Parks Master Planning: Part Seven | Park Architectural (and Landscape Design) History").

I suppose there are a couple more I should write, on transportation access ("Revisiting: Access to Theodore Roosevelt Island, a national park in Washington, DC," 2022), on planning for multiple agencies owning parks in particular jurisdictions ("Federal shutdown as another example of why local jurisdictions should have more robust contingency and master planning processes," 2013), and including for profit actors in the sector as part of master planning ("Why community recreation plans should include for profit actors: What do you do when important assets face dissolution?," 2021) which I've written about for even longer.

Still, 8 years.  One of the other board members really helped push this along in the past 18 months, so it does show the value of having independent boards.  Again, it puts in perspective how long change takes.  That's the equivalent of two political terms.  I always laugh when after 6 months or so people are complaining about the failure of newly elected public officials to do anything.

.... But you've got to invest in those boards.  The city and county have failed to do that.  Luckily, we have a couple of more engaged board members, and the board is becoming more active and less passive.

====
I fought to keep grills as part of the program.  Our park manager (the County) has been removing grills.  But because we are independent, they had to do what we wanted. I argued grills are part of equity. Similarly, we've developed some nice signage for the pavilion, although it's not quite installed.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, August 14, 2024

Revitalization in a distressed residential-industrial neighborhood: Pullman, Chicago, Illinois

I came across an interesting case study by the Chicago Business School, The Pullman Historic District: A partnership in place-based community investment, about the revitalization of the distressed neighborhood of Pullman, in Chicago.  

The effort was sparked by Park Bank, a locally focused community bank ("It shouldn't be a surprise that big banks are more comfortable dealing with large businesses | Community banking"), and its community development corporation which was doing a lot of housing rehabilitation.  It was also very much committed to community organization and involvement.

In planning, most cities use a 4 to 7 step ladder to summarize the economic health of a neighborhood: distressed, emerging, transitioning, and healthy.  Pullman is distressed.  The closure of various industrial businesses over the past decades decimated its economy.

With the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, the community bank was acquired by US Bank, which decided to continue to commit financial and technical assistance resources to the revitalization program in Pullman.

Main Administration Building of the Pullmans Palace Car Company, 1893. From a publicity brochure published by the Pullman Company. Pullman Company Archives of the Newberry Library, Chicago, Illinois.

Pullman was an industrial community, known for being the home of the Pullman railcar operation, which finally went kaput in 1955, although it manufactured cars elsewhere into the 1980s, and was later absorbed by Bombardier.

The community bank developed a plan to redevelop an old industrial site, which was complicated because of its size, community needs, and contamination.  

Historic Pullman homes come in a variety of different styles and sizes throughout the neighborhood. NPS Photo/Stephanie Schneider.

The original intent was to build retail and housing on the brownfield site, but wrt housing they realized they didn't need to build more, but instead should be focused on rehabilitation and re-occupancy of existing housing.

Just before the acquisition, the community bank received $50 million in New Markets Tax Credits, which passed to USB.  To meet self-dealing strictures, they spun off the CDC and gave the NMTC to it, which provided vitally needed capital.

At the time, Walmart was the only retailer interested. which was controversial, but people got a store and entry level jobs.  A community benefits agreement provided other inducements, as did the creation of a community center (eventually taken over by the parks department), and two light industrial facilities, for a total of about 1,200 jobs.

Like in DC at the time, when Walmart was expanding to cities. I ended up writing many entries on the issue:

-- "Walmart: in the city, vs. of the city," 2011
-- "Lessons from Walmart's foray into DC," 2011
-- "Wal-mart plays hardball with DC," 2013
-- "What community benefits are supposed to be versus what people think they are about," 2013
-- "More Walmart in DC," 2013
-- "6Ps, Walmart in DC and "I hate to say I told you so"," 2014
-- "Lessons from Walmart's foray into Washington, DC," 2011
-- "Piling on City Council for Walmart," 2013
-- "I hope for Aspen Hills' sake that Montgomery County is smart enough to learn from DC's planning errors with regard to Walmart's entry," 2012

-- op-ed piece, Washington Business Journal, "Temper Walmart glee with planning") 

While the case study lauds the Walmart as using an architectural style sympathetic to the local historic architecture, it looks a lot like the one on Georgia Avenue in DC.  At least the DC one has underground parking exclusively, rather than a big parking lot in front.  Vague historic aesthetic, nothing particularly specific.

To put into scale the jobs issue, the peak employment of the Pullman manufacturing plant was 10,000.  And there were many other businesses in the area, like International Harvester. So today, they have recaptured fewer than 20% of the jobs when the community was successful.  This is the reality of urban deindustrialization, either:

  • closure of businesses
  • consolidation of businesses with employment reduction
  • replacement of workers with capital
  • businesses moving out of cities 
  • layoffs and tiered wages ("How the American South Drives the Low-Wage Economy," American Prospect)
  • businesses moving overseas.
This is why I get angry when Republicans say "Democrats destroyed cities."  Elected officials didn't make those decisions.  And why spending upwards of $200 million on community improvement doesn't seem to have immediate effect.  From the study:

Place-based investing seeks to create positive economic and social returns in a given geography—say, a neighborhood: Pullman—through a coordinated influx of capital and development. The idea is layered: financial investors will see financial returns; “social” investors will see financial returns and community impact; and the community will benefit from economic development in the form of jobs, access to goods, services, housing, and quality of life. 

According to CNI10, the investments it spearheaded in Pullman between 2010 and 2019 brought $350 million dollars into the community, leading to the development of more than a million feet of commercial, industrial, and recreational space; creating 1,500 permanent jobs, a 43 percent increase for the area; and leading to a 136% percent rise in residential property values. Jennifer Bransfield—now the organization’s chief operations officer and general counsel— indicates that a majority of this investment occurred within a single census tract.

National Monument.  In 2015, the Pullman manufacturing site was designated as a national monument, the Pullman National Historic ParkPlanning document.

Evaluation.  The case study discusses the difficulty of evaluating the success of the funding.  Time, causality, and replicability are issues.

My point would be that as a distressed community, revitalization will take decades, especially given the nature of the types of vacant land, which cost extranormal amounts to come back online.

It presented Census data, which finds the area is still losing population and wage growth is stagnant.

Lessons.  "Don't drip money." Invest large amounts.  New Markets tax credits can be a good capital source.  The area has a logistics hub opportunity, brownfield site attracted other funding sources.

Future.  Chicago Neighborhood Initiatives, the re-branded CDC, is now working beyond the Pullman neighborhood, is developing a microenterprise funding initiative, and developing its capacity to invest and help other areas grow.

Planning relevance.  I think this project is a good example of my "best practice revitalization planning" approach, including the elements:
  • a robust plan
  • an implementation organization
  • funding
  • serendipity -- jumping on opportunities, like the National Monument
  • recognition of the length of time required to execute the program

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, March 20, 2024

Why drug stores don't have housing above/aren't mixed use buildings

 GGW has a piece, "CVS stores that should have apartments above them, ranked."

This store is in Baltimore but the same point pertains.  The second story is fake.  That's a common tactic for chain stores who get complaints that the building isn't tall enough, that it could be mixed use.

I wrote about this 10 years ago ("Beyond matter of right: incentivizing preferred types of development").

It's because of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("Problematic outcomes as real estate investment trusts buy more "high street" retail real estate," 2015).  Some specialize in drug store properties.  They don't want them encumbered by anything else.  Just the drug store.  So properties that would be good for mixed use aren't used that way, because it's not part of the business model.

Drug stores that are in mixed use buildings are in those in those buildings because of different kinds of business relationships.

====

I remember talking about this with a planner from Takoma Park.  At the New Hampshire Avenue/University Boulevard intersection is a big Walgreen's.  It actually is part of a large parcel, and Takoma Park wanted to buy it or have an interested developer get it.  Walgreen's didn't even know it was a multi-building parcel and they had no interest in selling it to a third party, only a REIT.

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, March 13, 2024

Gaps in Parks Master Planning: Part Three | Planning for Climate Change/Environment

 Gaps in park master planning frameworks


But while I have written a bunch about parks and transportational access, I didn't think to include that as another topic in the series.  The challenge is to ensure that as many parks as possible are accessible by transit.  This, and other forms of accessibility, should be covered in a parks master plan.

====

-- The State of the Great Outdoors: America’s Parks, Public Lands, and Recreation Resources, Resources for the Future (2009) 
-- Addressing 21st Century Conservation Challenges to Benefit Our People, Economy, and Environment, Conservation Conversations

Climate change and national parks.  Parks with extraordinary  environmental features face big losses in the face of sustained heat.

Many of the signature parks operated by the National Park Service will sustain serious damage from climate change and managers will have to make hard choices about what elements of parks can survive and what will have to be abandoned ("Resist, accept, direct framework").

-- Green Parks Plan: Advancing the National Park Service Mission Through Sustainable Operations, third edition, NPS
-- Planning for a Changing Climate, NPS
-- Climate change in National Parks brochure
-- Park visitation and climate change, NPS
-- Parks and Climate Change, National Parks Conservation Association
- "Some U.S. national parks are trying to go carbon-free. What does that mean for visitors?," National Geographic
-- "What to Save? Climate Change Forces Brutal Choices at National Parks," New York Times
-- Plan for Climate-Smart Cities, Trust for Public Land
-- "Saving our national parks could save us too," Salt Lake Magazine
-- "How the climate crisis is forever changing our national parks," CNN

State Parks and Climate Change


Webinar: Climate Change and State Parks

Local/City/Urban Parks and Climate Change

-- How Cities Use Parks for Climate Change Management, American Planning Association
-- Parks as a climate solution, TPL
-- (Parks) adapting to climate change: Working with nature to transition our urban environment, Plante&Cité
-- Implementing Eco-Management: Concepts and practice for more nature in the city, Plante&Cité
-- "The carbon sequestration potential of urban public parks of densely populated cities to improve environmental sustainability," Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
-- "50 Grades of Shade," Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

According to the Trust for Public Land (The Power of Parks to Address Climate Change, webpage, report) parks are good at greening.

  • Eighty-five percent of cities are adapting parks and recreation facilities to address climate change
  • Eighty percent are enlisting parks to counter urban heat
  • Seventy-six percent are improving surfaces to reduce flooding and runoff from rains
  • Twenty percent are actively managing parks and woodlands to sequester carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas responsible for climate change. 
  • Other cities are managing parks to reduce the risk of wildfire, restoring shorelines to absorb storm surges, and opting for renewable sources of energy. 
  • Cooling green space is not equitably distributed, however. Trust for Public Land analyzed the 100 most populous cities and found that the neighborhoods where most residents identify as people of color had access to an average of 43 percent less park acreage than predominantly white neighborhoods.
If 85% of cities are addressing parks and climate change, then my thesis that this is a gap in parks master planning practice is wrong.  OTOH, it's a micro versus macro scale issue.  And the reality is that the day to day operations requirements and the increased demand from the public for both more parks and more activities and facilities makes dealing with long term issues, like climate change, difficult.  

  • During heat waves now and in the future urban microclimates put human health at risk.
  • Intercepting solar radiation is the most effective way to reduce the heat load on people.
  • Reducing air temperature is the second most effective way to reduce heat loads
  • Evidence-based climate-responsive design can make parks more thermally comfortable.

Elements of a Cultural Landscape Report, from the NPS brochure on Cultural Landscapes

Planning at the landscape scale for Sugar House Park: the cultural landscape.  A way to tie the various planning approaches together is to use the cultural landscape planning framework, which looks at sites in a variety of ways.

For the purposes of Sugar House Park we should focus on the elements of land, vegetation, buildings, and history.

-- "Gaps in Parks Master Planning: Part Eight | Second stage planning for parks using the cultural landscape framework"

Parley's Creek and its watershed.  In the 1800s, Salt Lake City got control of most of the water rights on nearby federal lands--the canyons--which are mostly controlled by the US Forest Service.  

Water rights are controlled by Salt Lake City Public Utilities, which defines watersheds in terms of the production of culinary water, not the flow to the Great Salt Lake.

Parley's Creek and a pond are part of the Park, and part of the Jordan River watershed, which flows into the Great Salt Lake.

To SLCPU, the "watershed" ends at the mouth of the canyon and its water treatment plant.  The Creek's contribution beyond the Canyon to "the general watershed" comes from water discharges into the Creek, but past the Canyon, much of the Creek derives from storm water.  And these days we don't get a lot of rain.


Within the park the Creek is mostly daylighted, with a small section not, because it was contaminated when the site was a prison.  The Creek Management Plan provides a number of recommendations for the Creek within the Park.  But not much has been addressed since the plan was released in 2010!

As we gear up to do a new round of master planning, one element will be the Creek and pond.  

The Park is implementing a wayfinding and interpretation signage system, so we have an opportunity to do some watershed interpretation.  

On our list of things to do, we are organizing a kind of symposium of the area river and creek stakeholders so that we start moving on Creek issues.  The state has the Jordan River Commission, and the advocacy group, the Seven Canyons Trust, works on creek daylighting issues throughout the County.

There are good models for better practice.  Nearby Fairmont Park, run by the city, has done a lot with their portion of the Creek.  Fairmont has springs, which feed a fishing pond.  Fitts Park in the City of South Salt Lake, which includes Mill Creek, has done nice stabilization work around their creek too.  

Flooding/Flood control
.  In the 1980s, Salt Lake City experienced major flooding because higher than normal temperatures led to premature snow melt.

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) High water levels in Salt Lake City's Sugar House Park on Wednesday, April 26, 2023.

As a result, Sugar House Park was rebuilt in part as a flood control structure.  When snowmelt is high, Public Utilities will do water discharges so that the reservoirs don't overflow.  

We don't have issues at the scale of a coastal city like Boston (Climate Ready Action Plan), but sometimes parts of the park may close because of risk management planning and flood control.  Fortunately this is an infrequent occurrence.  Last year there was flooding at the park, resulting in road closure ("Flooding at Sugar House Park means the pond is working as planned," Salt Lake Tribune). 

Water conservation. The park is a lot of grass and trees and we water it.  I need to find out about the ability to use recycled water.  I don't think Salt Lake City is set up for it.  

Parks serve many people, therefore should remain a priority for water use, compared to other institutional users.  But we need to be efficient.  We are planning to add various monitoring sensors and upgrade the irrigation system ($1 million minimum) and other equipment to address this.  

We need to collect and present information on water conservation and irrigation in our plans, on the website, etc.

Turf and plants.  Grass uses a lot of water.  Two years ago, Salt Lake City Public Utilities introduced a turf blend that uses 30% less water ("SLC's drought tolerant turf is such a hit, other communities in Utah want some," Utah NPR).  

That's something to look at, but then we have a lot of grass we'd need to dig up.  One option could be to convert some sections of the park to meadow.

-- "Urban park visitor preferences for vegetation – An on-site qualitative research study," Plants, People, Planet

Trees/arboretum.  Trees: serve as shade devices, are an equity issue, and provide environmental benefits ("‘Turn Off the Sunshine’: Why Shade Is a Mark of Privilege in Los Angeles" and "How Decades of Racist Housing Policy Left Neighborhoods Sweltering," New York Times)

Planting new trees is important but faces challenges because of heat and water (Landscaping for shade, US DOE, "How Much Can Forests Fight Climate Change? A Sensor in Space Has Answers.," New York Times, "What About the Trees? Trees as Nature-Based “Shade Sails”," American Journal of Public Health, Your tree planting companion, TEAGSAC Urban Forestry Department, Ireland, "Cities Are Good at Planting Trees. They’re Not So Good at Keeping Them," Walrus).

Tree planting as a city equity measure is an important priority of the Salt Lake Mayor.

Infographic about the climate change impact of tree planting 
as part of a bus rapid transit project in Cleveland.

Over the next year we are looking to become accredited as an arboretum, which provides another opportunity for environmental interpretation, improve tree cover, do fundraising, etc.  

-- American Forests
-- TreeUtah
-- ArborDay, April 26
-- National Park City Foundation
-- International Day of Forests, March 21


-- Community Forests: A path to prosperity and connection, TPL
-- "Cities Nationwide Combat Climate Change With Urban Forests," Governing
-- "Since When Have Trees Existed Only for Rich Americans?,"  New York Times
--  "Befriending Trees to Lower a City's Temperature," New York Times
-- "Why trees in Los Angeles are political, cherished, underfunded and controversial," Los Angeles Daily News

A TreeUtah event in Fairmont Park, Salt Lake City

-- "Northeast Ohio cities work to reverse history and impacts of tree canopy loss," Ideastream/NPR
-- "Mature trees are key to liveable cities – housing intensification plans must ensure they survive," Guardian
-- "‘I’m glowing’: scientists are unlocking secrets of why forests make us happy," Guardian
-- "It takes more than trees to build a livable city," Vox
-- "How America Is Making Tree Equity a Climate Solution for Cities," TIME Magazine
-- "The surprising way that millions of new trees could transform America," National Geographic

Creating an arboretum within the park is an opportunity to develop some great guides, brochures, education programs, etc. for interpretation.

Unfortunately, as more organizations shift to digital presentation, there is no longer access to the often great materials produced in the past.  The quality of today's brochures pale by comparison.

Plus, most state and local sites don't do a very good job of putting their documents online to begin with

One of my ideas is to develop an online database of such historical documents.  The closest we have is the database of the National Park Service's online brochures for the parks, as well as other materials.  NPS archives don't have everything, but remain an incredible resource.

Fauna/biodiversity.  Participating in the Bridge Park initiative 10 years ago ("Revisiting the 11th Street Bridge Park project as an opportunity rather than a folly: a new revitalization agenda for East of the River, DC"), I was struck by how one of the design teams focused on providing food not just for people, but for flora and fauna in and along the Anacostia River.

SHP is pretty sculpted.  Lawns are well maintained without much in the way of leaf litter or other elements that support insects and other fauna  ("Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: A review of empirical evidence," "City parks vs. natural areas - is it possible to preserve a natural level of bee richness and abundance in a city park?," Urban Ecosystems). 

This is a problem for residential property too ("The ‘no mow’ movement could transform our lawns," Washington Post).  From the article:
Mowing grass too short can cut the tops off flowering plants, creating lawns that are inhospitable for pollinators seeking habitats in which to feed, rest and nest, experts say. Keeping your lawn neat and trim not only is resource-intensive but can also affect its overall health. 

 British Wildlife Photography awards. Hidden Britain Runner-up 
Flower crab spider and Honey bee, Lee Mill, Devon by Lucien Harris

... creating a pollinator lawn will take a bit more thought than just letting grass grow freely, experts say. “If you have a traditional lawn, letting the grass grow to a foot tall or whatever it would be at the end of May is no value whatsoever,” says Susan Carpenter, native plant garden curator at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Arboretum. Grass that long could be harmful to lawn health and become a mowing nightmare.
The park has some insects ("What urban nature really means for insect biodiversity," Horizon: The EU research and information magazine), birds ("Urban parks are a refuge for birds in park-poor areas," Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution), and maybe some small animals like raccoons.

To expand fauna diversity, perhaps we should install bat houses and beehives.  We do have a community garden, and are looking to create another.

Of the entire park, only a small section along the Creek is "more wild."  

Mows to Meadow Project in Philadelphia's Fairmount Park is converting some grass areas to meadows planted with native plants.

We may wish to stop mowing some parts of the park to increase opportunities for fauna ("Meadow Developing in Flagstaff Park to Restore Habitat," Cambridge, Massachusetts).

The south side of the park abuts the I-80 freeway so it's very noisy.  

Long term, we could deal with UDOT to increase plantings on the abutting embankment to support fauna (Roadside Best Management Practices that Benefit Pollinators, FHWA) and reduce noise (that section of freeway used to be part of the park).  

How much do we manage the park for people and for fauna is a question definitely not posed by the existing master plan.

Ducks and dogs as disease vectors
.  Sadly, because of the pond, the park has a hell of a lot of ducks.

Which end up contributing e. coli to the Jordan River watershed, which in turn flows into the Great Salt Lake.  

Who knew e. coli could be a park management issue.  

Errant dog owners who don't clean up after their pets are big contributors too.

Plus people feed inappropriate food like bread to the ducks.  We have signs up, but it doesn't matter.

Carbon neutrality/greenhouse gas emissions, etc.Ellinikon Park (designer website, Ellinikon Experience Park website), under construction in Athens, Greece has the goal of being carbon neutral--increase carbon sequestration, limit or avoid emissions, and reuse embodied carbon--but it will take 35 years to accomplish.  ("Carbon-First Design: The Ellinikon Metropolitan Park in Athens," ASLA).


Should that be a goal for Sugar House Park?  While grass clippings are left on the grass, we don't compost from trees and shrubs.  That's an issue.  Can we improve our energy use?  We are bystanders to the Salt Lake Valley's air quality problems ("Reaching for Air: The Salt Lake Valley’s pollution problem can be solved. Will Utah leaders act?" and "Reaching for Air: The price Utahns pay for poor air quality," Salt Lake Tribune) but by planting more trees, etc., we can help on that score.

Transportation demand management.  Despite all the media coverage about how environmentally-conscious Utah is, the fact is that the predominate land use and transportation planning paradigm is sprawl.  While there is a transit system that is decent for what it is, but most everyone drives.

Motor vehicles significantly contribute to the air quality problem.  A lot of patrons come to the park by car.  Can we reduce our park's contribution to the problem by working to improve biking and transit options for getting to the park?

Klyde Warren Park over Woodall Rodgers Freeway, Dallas (History).

Noise/Freeway decking/capping.  To deal with aesthetics, noise, and opportunity, I have a crazy idea to deck/cap the freeway section like Klyde Warren Park in Dallas or the Big Dig in Boston.  

Many cities are pursuing such projects ("Philly’s other big I-95 project to start: A cap with an 11.5-acre waterfront park, South St. pedestrian bridge," Philadelphia Inquirer, "Feds grant $450 million toward I-5 freeway caps in North Portland’s Albina district," Portland Oregonian," "Interstate 5 in Downtown Seattle: Put a Lid on It?," Seattle Met).

Because the section next to the park (it was part of the park before the freeway was built) is so big--40 acres--it presents better opportunities compared to most other cities.  It would cost hundreds of millions and take at least a decade to plan and build.

Climate change effects on park visitors

Hubert H. Humphrey Memorial Park, Pacoima, California. Thermal radar shows the differences in heat on a basketball court after reflective paint coatings were applied. 

Sun and heat.  Parks need to acknowledge heat and climate as issues that can suppress park use.  For example, brutal heat in July and August means kids probably stay inside. 

We have an open basketball court at Sugar House Park, and last summer I went up to some teens and asked them questions about what they thought about the amenities.

They mentioned shade was an issue commenting how they liked the trees that were there.  I came back with suggestions like an additional (perhaps temporary) small shade structure, misters, and adding more trees as shade devices--we can take out a bit of asphalt and add trees.  They also mentioned their desire for a water bottle filler at the nearby restrooms. 


Reflective paint to reduce thermal effects.  Special reflective paints are a way to reduce the effect of heat on roads--the park loop road includes separated walking and biking lanes, concrete pads, courts and other facilities ("As heat waves increase, Los Angeles is coating some streets with ‘cool pavement’," Los Angeles Times, "This L.A. neighborhood's 'cool pavements' help it beat the intense heat," NBC).

Shade screens and mistersA park in South Salt Lake, Fitts Park, has a shade screen over their playground, and it makes a significant different in heat between shade and sun.  Surprisingly, shade screens are few and far between.  

Phoenix and some other cities have developed community shade plans with parks and open spaces being key to responding to the challenges presented.

-- Tree and Shade master plan, Phoenix

Playground equipment gets super hot in the sun.  The Washington Post had a great article, "Kids getting burned on swings and slides? Here’s how to fix it," about research on heat and playgrounds.

-- Guide to Climate Friendly Playgrounds, Western Sydney University
-- "Outdoor playgrounds and climate change: Importance of surface materials and shade to extend play time and prevent burn injuries," Building and Environment (2022)

Shade screens can make a 20° or more difference between shade and direct sunlight.

Hydration. An issue.  Should we have more water stations?  It turns out over 80% of the park's budget is spent on utilities including "culinary water."

Kurt Amuedo, a third grader at University Park Elementary in Denver, Colorado, displays poster protesting air pollution for Earth Day. Denver Post.

Climate change as an opportunity for civic engagement within parks and parks systems

Sustainability education.  Dealing with climate change as it effects a local park is the opportunity for teaching and learning about the environment.  

Repositioning environmental issues around sustainability leads to renewed interest and innovative approaches to issues.

 When I worked in Baltimore County in 2009/2010, I was struck by the rise in interest and involvement in sustainability.  At the time many communities were creating sustainability plans, colleges and universities and other institutions renewed their environmental initiatives around sustainability, communities like Baltimore created sustainability commissions.  There was definitely a participation boost.

We can categorize participation as external or internal:

  • External: "ambassador" programs that engage with patrons, treating the park campus as an outdoor classroom and holding workshops for students, events like Montgomery County's GreenFest 
  • Internal: planting trees, doing park clean ups, conducting citizen science projects like measuring water quality in Parley's Creek

Sugar House Park has a "Garden Center," that has been under-active.  We can reposition it around Gardening and the Environment, add a slew of activities and programs, making it a leading node within a network of top notch outdoor education centers in the Salt Lake Valley. 

Labels: , , , , , , , ,