Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space

"A community’s physical form, rather than its land uses, is its most intrinsic and enduring characteristic." [Katz, EPA] This blog focuses on place and placemaking and all that makes it work--historic preservation, urban design, transportation, asset-based community development, arts & cultural development, commercial district revitalization, tourism & destination development, and quality of life advocacy--along with doses of civic engagement and good governance watchdogging.

Tuesday, March 31, 2026

South Shore Line Interurban extension in Indiana

SSL en route in Michigan City on local surface streets.

This is notable because the South Shore Line, powered by electricity, is the only still functioning interurban train line in revenue service in the entire United States..  

As a mode, interurban was between heavy rail and train, with dedicated and mixed tracks and reasonably frequent cities operating within and between cities.  They carried passengers and local freight (not unlike todays package delivery services).

It was said transferring from one system to another you could get from Chicago to New England on interurbans.  Or from San Diego to Portland or Seattle.

Unlike heavy rail or railroad freight and passenger services, interurban lines could be street running within cities, like streetcars, and today's South Shore Line is distinguished in some places by still running on the street network in various communities along the line.  

Once owned by Samuel Insull, who owned many electricity generation and streetcar companies, like the CTA and London Underground, which he also controlled at one time, they were known for their poster marketing of sites on the line ("Moonlight in Duneland: Marketing the South Shore Line in the 1920s").

The DC area had such a system operating between Washington, Baltimore and Annapolis.


Today the South Shore Line operates between Downtown Chicago and South Bend, Indiana's Airport (originally the line went to downtown). Some trains go all the way from South Bend, while others start at either Michigan City or Gary. Like other similar services, for a time it had access to the Elevated track system of the Chicago Transit Authority.

These days it mostly serves Indiana, with 20 stations, and has a minute number of riders, less than 7,000 per day. But a goodly number of trains--26/27 go to or are from Chicago.



Starting today, the new "Monon Corridor" adds four stations with a terminus in Dyer, Indiana ("All Aboard! South Shore Line announces opening of new Monon Corridor expansion service," WSBT-TV).

But wow, what can they do to increase ridership? 

Certainly, an Indiana based Chicago Bears football team could generate some weekend ridership but only a few times per year.  

The South Bend Station no longer is in the center city, but on the outskirts.  While inconvenient, the location is probably not a deal breaker in terms of willingness to ride transit.  

What changes in marketing or otherwise would make a significant difference in ridership?

Labels: , , ,

Monday, March 30, 2026

A homogeneous mobility system: cars and for medium and long distance trips, airplanes, doesn't work in crisis

Travelers waiting at a TSA checkpoint at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport on Friday. Elijah Nouvelage/Bloomberg News

Trains.  An AP writer took the train from Atlanta to DC to avoid the chaos at Hartsfield Airport due to the federal shutdown of pay for TSA agents ("Midnight train from Georgia: A view of America from the tracks as airports struggle in the shutdown").  Most places don't have that option.

Planes.  The crush at Hartsfield is being played out similarly at airports across the country ("Why the TSA Lines in Atlanta Are Longer Than Other Airports," Wall Street Journal).

Plus there is the issue of the Iran War raising jet fuel prices ("As oil prices rise, airfares are surging and some airlines might not survive," Los Angeles Times) making fares higher, although trains face higher diesel fuel prices (and would do better if more lines were electrified).  From the article:

United Airlines Chief Executive Scott Kirby said this week that his company could face an $11-billion loss if oil prices remain at their current levels. Meanwhile, United’s airfare could increase by 20%, he said.

With thin profit margins and oil prices hovering around $100 per barrel, airlines have no choice but to pass the increased costs onto consumers.

It would make more sense to develop the passenger railroad system on medium distance trips focused on shifting trips from plane to train, such as DC to Philadelphia, or NYC or NYC to Boston, Dallas to Houston, etc., but the airlines advocate heavily against such a policy change.


Many European countries have developed high speed rail networks in part to divert airplane trips to trains.  

Brightline Florida is a rail line from Miami to Orlando, targeting tourists.  According to the Mark Brown Substack "Car Free America," "Brightline Passenger Rail Is Booming While America Still Has No Real Alternative to $4 Gas and $400 Domestic Flights."

Automobiles.  The Iran War is why gas prices are up over 50% in the US.  A car-dependent economy has no real alternative but to keep driving.  Some cities have decent transit systems, and may experience a rise in ridership.  

Most metropolitan areas don't have the right form to make transit work very well, regardless of the cost of gasoline.

In response to the oil shocks of the 1970s, countries like Denmark and the Netherlands reshaped their mobility and land use policies to favor walking, biking, transit, and compact development, to reduce their dependence on automobility and fuels (gas or diesel) produced elsewhere.  Unlike the US, they didn't say biking and walking is good to do, and then didn't change policies much to make this policy in practice, they changed all kinds of laws, imposed high gasoline taxes, etc.

Mark Kauzlarich, Bloomberg.

The US did impose efficiency requirements on the car industry and some environmental efficiency measures to reduce energy use and under Carter reduced speed limits on Interstates to 55mph and created right turn on red rules (saving cars from having to idle).

But mostly, the US doubled down on gasoline-dependence, investing in the military around maintaining access to oil, and by creating the Strategic Reserve--the idea was to buy gas when it was cheap, and put it on the market in dire circumstances.

Ethanol.  The US also adopted ethanol requirements.  But they are a waste.  In the US, ethanol is made from freshly grown corn, using agricultural resources.  In Brazil, instead the feedstock is used cane sugar stalks, so they are reusing waste to make fuel, rather than expending more resources than what are gained back in energy density.  Ethanol doesn't save gas really, but it does help provide demand in agricultural states like Iowa, making them strong defenders of the process.

Ford and other automakers have spent years building up a supply chain to support their rollout of EVs. Scott Olson/Getty Images

Electric vehicles.  They are still cars, and an automobile-centric land use and transportation paradigm is a poor use of land and resources.  

But electric vehicles are an environmental strategy and tactic  Having an electric car insulates drivers from hiccups in the oil-gasoline supply chain that result in severe price increases ("What to Know About Electric Cars When Gas Prices Are Surging," New York Times).

Hill Family Bicycle Group with the US Capitol in the background

Bike, walk (and transit).  In the MinnPost ("Skip Starbucks to save gas? There are better strategies") Bill Lindeke suggests walking, biking or using transit as alternatives to high gas prices.  He writes from Minneapolis-St. Paul which has a decent light rail and bus system.  Most cities don't.

Heterogeneous mobility paradigm.  The difference between the US and Germany is that both manufacture cars, but of the two, only the US produces oil ("The Petro States of America," Bloomberg).  

That could be the reason that Germany has a much more heterogeneous mobility policy. 

It loves its cars--known for autobahns without speed limits--but recognizes cities are best served by transit, and most major cities have multiple modes well serving their communities.  

The German Transport Association model created in Hamburg is a model that US metropolitan areas should adopt ("The answer is: Create a single multi-state/regional multi-modal transit planning, management, and operations authority association," 2017, "Verkehrsverbund: The evolution and spread of fully integrated regional public transport in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland," International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2018) .

Barcode public art project.  A40 Autobahn/Freeway, Ruhrgebeit-Essen, Germany

For the past few years, for sustainability and climate change reasons, it's sponsored a national transit pass ("The Deutschland-Ticket for just 63 euros per month," DB).

Germany also promotes walking and biking (the Federal Bike Plan in its various iterations always turns out to be good).  

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, March 29, 2026

Seattle East Side light rail expansion


Opened Saturday.  From the Seattle Times article "Seattle light rail crosses Lake Washington this weekend. What to know"

Sound Transit’s pioneering seven-mile segment, along with stations on Mercer Island and in Seattle’s Judkins Park neighborhood took 18 years from voter approval to completion, will fuse Eastside and Seattle routes into a 58-mile network, with tentacles stretching to Lynnwood, Redmond and Federal Way for a $3 standard fare.

... first-day ridership could surpass the 137,000 boardings when Taylor Swift performed here in 2023, though probably not the 225,000 who flooded the stations Feb. 11, the day of the Seahawks Super Bowl victory parade.

Each addition to the system leads to significant rises in ridership (e.g., way better than DC Metrorail's Silver Line).  Current ridership is about 108,000 per day and will increase with the connection to Seattle from the East Side--in 2024 a partial Line 2 had been running, with a later extension in 2025, but not crossing Lake Washington.

Seen from Mount Baker Beach, sprays of water from a fireboat greet a light rail train as it crosses Lake Washington on the first day of cross-lake service Saturday, March 28, 2026. 
(Bettina Hansen / The Seattle Times)

It will also bring about big changes to many bus routes ("How Seattle light rail crossing Lake Washington will change bus service")--King County has one of the biggest bus systems in the US.  But also for Community Transit in Snohomish County, where a terminal station will operate.

This is something I've long recommended for DC, to National Airport:

Unrelated to this weekend’s opening, Sound Transit is beginning a night bus pilot line that will run every half-hour between downtown Seattle and the airport. The overnight service on Route 570 will begin about 15 minutes after train service ends.

Seen from Mount Baker Beach, sprays of water from a fireboat greet a light rail train as it crosses Lake Washington on the first day of cross-lake service Saturday, March 28, 2026. (Bettina Hansen / The Seattle Times)

Labels:

Saturday, March 28, 2026

WMATA's 50th anniversary from the start of service, Part 2b | Lessons learned: Proposed expansions and the Metrorail system we don't have

This is part of a series:

-- "Reprint with editing: Today WMATA Metrorail's 50th anniversary from the start of service | Part 1: many lessons can be found, if you look"
-- "WMATA's 50th anniversary from the start of service, Part 2a | The Original Approved Metrorail System (1968-1970)"
-- "WMATA's 50th anniversary from the start of service, Part 2b | Lessons learned: Proposed expansions and the Metrorail system we don't have"
-- "WMATA's 50th anniversary from the start of service, Part 3 | Stations"
-- "WMATA's 50th anniversary from the start of service, Part 4 | Buses"
-- "WMATA's 50th anniversary from the start of service | Part 5: Making a better transit network | Connecting heavy rail + light rail + railroad -- a concept for New York City 

Each discusses what I think of as the lessons that should be learned from Metrorail, as a transit service and as an economic development augur.

Recently I acquired a copy of the February 1976 issue of "Metro Notes", a tabloid published by WMATA throughout the construction process.  The Approved Plan Map shows the current system, with 11 potential extensions.  Three were constructed:  (1) two Blue Line, stations from Addison Road to Largo; (2) from Rockville to Shady Grove on the Red Line; and (3) the Silver Line.  All were covered on the Approved Plan Map (1968-1970).  

Two infill stations were later added, NoMA on the Red Line ("Having Turned a Corner, Washington’s NoMa Is Coming Alive," New York Times) and Potomac Yards on the Blue/Yellow Line ("Metro's New Potomac Yard-VT Station Is Open. Here's What to Know," NBC).  

Because of the number of images, the map alone is a separate entry.  Note that I am sure to have missed some officially sanctioned proposals of some sort or another.

Where we are today:

Today's Metrorail system

6 lines, 130 miles of track, 98 stations.  No current planning for extensions or intensifications. Daily ridership was about 750,000 before covid.  The system exceeded one million riders for the Obama Inauguration, and had a number of peak days greater than 750,000.  


Today's ridership is about 2/3rds of peak.

The Purple Line Light Rail Link (opening 2028)

The Purple Line is a light rail link between Bethesda and New Carrollton Metrorail Stations in Montgomery and Prince George's County Maryland, and will also connect to the Green Line in College Park/  It will also connect to all three MARC commuter rail lines, at Silver Spring (Brunswick Line), College Park (Camden Line) and New Carrollton (Penn Line).

There will be 17 new stations in addition to the existing transfer stations.

The line was conceptualized in 1987, when Maryland bought rail right of way "abandoned" by CSX because it was no longer needed to serve the since shuttered electricity generation plant in Georgetown. 

The Purple Line is being constructed by Maryland.  

Like how the Silver Line was constructed by the State of Virginia and then given to Metrorail, Maryland intended to transfer the Light Rail line to WMATA too--which is different technology from the heavy rail system--but WMATA said no.  

It is still expected that service schedules, fares and mapping will be integrated with WMATA, at least this was intended according to a letter from John Porcari, then State Transportation Secretary, to Chevy Chase, Maryland c. 2015.

While the Purple Line was conceptualized as a fully circumferential line connecting all the legs of the Metrorail system (see below), only the section between Bethesda and New Carrollton is under construction.  No planning for extensions is underway.

The Metrorail system we don't have

If you don't plan for extensions or intensifications, you don't get them.  In the first entry, under transit infrastructure lessons, point 1:

While the early system was expensive and seemed extensive, it missed areas that would have been good to have been included, and WMATA didn't continue to work for expansion beyond the original system program.  

WMATA kept saying, not until we finish the original Approved Plan.  This meant that original concepts of extensions mostly did not come about. (I pointed this out to the first Dr. Gridlock columnist for the Washington Post, c. 1990.)

As the Purple Line light rail program proves, it takes decades to build rail.  If you do it in fits and starts it takes a lifetime.

To further explore this point, at the outset of construction of the system, there was an Adopted Approved Plan for the system, eventually slightly modified to have 103 miles of track with 83 stations, and separately, a set of recommended extensions.  Of the 11 proposed extensions, only three were completed. 

THE MAP

The expansive Metrorail system planned at the outset

Washington Regional Rapid Rail Transit System Map
Adopted March 1968. Revised February 1969 and June 1970

The map of the system, printed in that issue, and just before the system started operation, shows a number of "authorized" or planned "further" extensions.  These were the authorized extensions, listed clockwise from the map:

  • Green Line, north from Greenbelt to Laurel, ≅8 miles
  • Orange Line east leg, from New Carrollton to Bowie, ≅9 miles
  • Blue Line from Addison Road to Largo (two stations)
  • Green Line, south from Branch Avenue to Brandywine, ≅12 miles
  • Yellow Line south leg, from Huntington to Fairfield -- unknown.  I don't know where this is.  Commonly Fairfield in Fairfax County is thought to be west of Vienna Metrorail Station in the Fair Oaks area, not the Rte. 1 Corridor
  • Blue Line west leg from Franconia-Springfield to Burke, ≅8 miles
  • Columbia Pike Line from the Pentagon to Lincolnia 
  • Orange Line west leg, from Vienna to Centreville, ≅10 miles
  • What is now called the Silver Line, which was constructed in two segments, serving Fairfax and Loudoun Counties with 11 stations and 23.5 miles of track 
  • Red Line one station extension  from Rockville to Shady Grove
  • Red Line west leg, from Shady Grove to Germantown, ≅9 miles
If you ever wondered why Southern Towers in Alexandria is so tall, it's not just because of proximity to freeways, but also because they expected the Columbia Pike Metrorail Line to be constructed.

Remember, at the time of the initial planning, passenger railroad services were on the decline, so Metrorail is a mixture of a heavy rail subway in the core and a "commuter railroad" outside the core.

Since then, researchers have found that stations in the core of a region have the best ridership.
  
A good example of this for WMATA is the Silver Line, it extends 23.5 miles further out into the suburbs, with 11 stations, but only has a daily ridership of about 36,000, while the Red Line, which is more focused on the core, but still suburban, had at least 136,000 daily riders.  Data source.

Interestingly, the very first plan for a Silver Line c. 1971, forecasted around 30,000 riders, so you could say the Silver Line is meeting expectations.  But the other lines have double or more the ridership.  Without Dulles Airport as a primary and important destination, the line is less justifiable.

Most of the proposed extensions are exurban, but could be justifiable, IF AND ONLY IF, comparable to Arlington, those jurisdictions developed land use intensification plans in association with the expansion.  (Although this could be further criticized as sprawl.)

The c. 1991? WMATA Metrorail "21st Century" Map

I know nothing about the origin, but this was displayed in the office of then DC Councilmember Jack Evans, who served on the WMATA Board of Directors for many years.  Since it includes a circumferential Purple Line, which was first proposed in 1987, it was produced some time after 1987.


It shows:
  • A one station extension to Gaithersburg on the west leg of the Red Line (not to Germantown)
  • An extension to Olney from Glenmont on the east leg of the Red Line
  • A Wheaton-Georgetown-Manassas Line serving Columbia Pike, with 12 stations, including one for Kennedy Center
  • What became the Silver Line but  showing only three stations, but as far out as Leesburg, which is 17 miles further from Dulles Airport, and 11 miles from the current end of line Ashburn Station
  • A heavy rail Purple Line, a circle line connecting the legs.  This line doesn't show many stations between the legs.  It does show Montgomery Mall, Tysons Corner, a connection at "Ravenswood" to the Wheaton-Manassas Line, National Harbor, and Andrews Air Force Base
  • the Green Line south extension to Brandywine
  • an Orange Line extension to Annapolis
  • the Potomac Yards infill station in Alexandria
  • and the Green Line being extended from Greenbelt to Baltimore, a distance of about 29 miles
Most of the proposed extensions are exurban, but could be justifiable, IF AND ONLY IF, comparable to Arlington, those jurisdictions developed land use intensification plans in association with the expansion.  (Although this could be further criticized as sprawl.)  Penn Line MARC railroad service to Baltimore means a Green Line extension there isn't warranted, as it's an unnecessary duplication.

Regional Transit System Plan, 1999

The graphic is referenced in this document.  The extensions were supposed to be operational by 2025.  

It shows:
  •  An extension to Centreville; 
  • a loop for Tysons Corner; 
  • an outer circumferential route (the Purple Line, but heavy rail), from the Orange Line south of Tysons to Greenbelt; 
  • an inner circumferential route, from Bethesda to New Carrollton; 
  • a line from Wesley Heights/Georgetown to Fort Lincoln; 
  • from Columbia Heights? to Minnesota Avenue; 
  • a separated Yellow Line to Silver Spring; 
  • A line from Bailey's Crossroad-Columbia Pike to the Pentagon to Charles County, in part being a southern outer circumferential route (Purple Line, but heavy rail)
  • a Blue or Yellow Line extension to Fort Belvoir/Lorton.
It also includes the already approved extension to Largo then under construction, the previously referenced infill station at Potomac Yard, but for the first time, the infill New York Avenue Station (now called NoMA), between Union Station and Rhode Island Station, which began construction a couple years later.

Assignation of responsibility for expansion planning to the jurisdictions, not WMATA, 2000 

Silver Line, c. 2000

There have been many different planning iterations for a Silver Line, dating from the time of the initial Approved Plan(s) in 1968-1970.  In 2000, decisive planning was put into place by the State of Virginia, primarily to provide a Metrorail connection to Dulles Airport.   The final plan was approved in 2004.

This Washington Post graphic is from 2007.  The first phase opened in 2014 and the second in 2022.


Separated Blue Line, c. 2000-2001
(Or a Separated Silver Line)

The original proposal for a separated Blue Line dates to 2001 ("If DC had visionary elected officials and planners it could use the new WMATA "BOS" study to push through the development of a separated Silver Line in DC (and Northern Virginia)").  The main purposes were twofold: (1) to provide a separate platform at Rosslyn, taking pressure off the Blue and Orange Lines; and (2) to provide a parallel line to the Downtown stations as a "relief line," presuming that as the system approached 1,000,000 daily riders, existing stations would be at overcapacity.  

Two secondary purposes were providing service to Georgetown and to provide an additional connection to Union Station, to support plans for expansion of the station and an expected doubling or more of railroad passenger train ridership.

WMATA dropped this plan, in response to a regional economic downturn.  It's the foundation of my concept for a more ambitious Separated Silver Line.

With post-covid decline of Downtown DC as a regional employment center, there is less need for a "relief line" for the Downtown stations.  But Georgetown "needs" a station, and to accommodate planned future growth for Union Station ("Union Station in Washington Has a Grand Development Plan," New York Times), another Metrorail connection would be advantageous.

For awhile, only the Arlington County Master Transportation Plan kept the Separated Blue Line concept alive in their planning documents.

Except for the section east, starting at Minnesota Avenue to New Carrollton, the line would no longer interline in Virginia and most of DC, which is an advantage for reliability.

Separated Silver Line.  My concept riffs on the separated concept, based in part by comments on a post at GGW.  Instead of separating the Silver Line at Rosslyn, it drops down from East Falls Church, sending it southward to Seven Corners and east along Arlington Boulevard, to Rosslyn and then across the river to Georgetown and then east of the existing subway lines, to Union Station, and from there to H Street as in the original plan and then connecting to the Blue Line again at Stadium-Armory.  

At the very least it would be better to connect to the Orange Line at Minnesota Avenue, adding one or two stations on the RFK Campus and Benning Road.  This would serve the forthcoming RFK campus, not just for the stadium, but also for redevelopment of the parking lots.  Perhaps a leg could go up up Bladensburg Road into Prince George's County.  It would also provide a Metrorail connection to New York Avenue.  

Regional Transit System Plan, 2010

Assuming at least 10 years to construct major core capacity projects, we must identify a preferred expansion strategy and begin to preferred expansion strategy and begin to secure funding in the next 5 years
Regional Transit System Plan, 2013

This planing document fed into the next.  But it called for a lot more extensions, like the 1999 Plan.  I'm taking some liberties with this list.  Few of the examined opportunities made it into the Momentum Plan (next).  For rail it states:

(1) Purple Line in Maryland's portion of the Constrained Long Range Plan.  

And for WMATA by 2025:

(2) Metro Center/Gallery Place Pedestrian Walkway (planning for this dates to 2002)
(3) Farragut North/Farragut West Pedestrian Walkway
(4) Second Rosslyn Station and Blue or Silver Line separation options
(5) Possible separation of the Yellow and Green Lines
(6) A potential Brown line loop from Friendship Heights on the west to Cherry Hill in Montgomery County on the east.
(7) The Beltway Line, circumferential, more northerly than the Purple Line
(8) End of Line Extensions: (a) Green Line to BWI; (b) Orange or Blue Line to Bowie; (c) Blue Line to Potomac Mills; (d) Orange Line to Centreville or even further to Gainesville; (e) Red Line to Metropolitan Grove/Gaithersburg; (f) Green Line to National Harbor; (g) Yellow Line to Lorton; (h) Silver Line further to Leesburg.

And more infill stations: (1) Montgomery College on the west Red Line; (2) Kansas Avenue on the east Red Line; (3) Oklahoma Avenue on Blue/Orange (this station was planned in the original system but successfully opposed by residents); (4) St. Elizabeths Campus on the Green Line; (5) Eisenhower Avenue/Valley on the Blue/Yellow Lines.

Plus more interline connections.  Exploration of a Purple Line extension on New Hampshire Avenue to White Oak, and from New Carrollton to Alexandria.  And exploration of light rail in Upper Montgomery County (Corridor Cities).

Momentum: The Next Generation of Metro
Strategic Plan: 2013-2025 (published in 2013)

This plan is well done.  WRT Metrorail it suggests:

(1) possible extensions to Centreville (Orange Line in Virginia), to Bowie (Blue Line in Maryland) and to Potomac Mills (Blue Line in Virginia).

(2) a possible separated Blue line either more north between Rosslyn and H Street NE along M Street, or between Rosslyn and H Street via Constitution Avenue.

(3) A new platform station, separating the Orange and Blue Lines, for the Blue Line at Rosslyn

(4) Walkways between stations to foster foot-based transfers to stations in close proximity.  For example, this was proposed for Metro Center and Gallery Plan in a plan dating to 2002.  Later a walkway was suggested between Farragut West and Farragut North, to facilitate transfers without having to go to Metro Center.

(5) extension of the Purple Line south and west from New Carrollton to Virginia

There are also discussions about BRT, commuter rail, and streetcars, in keeping with various plans at the time, pursued by other transit agencies.

Connect Greater Washington - Transit Project/Strategy Summary, 2016

My mind is too full to give this document adequate justice: part one; part two.  

(1) Another Circumferential Line connecting the ends and the suburbs, further north than the current Purple Line alignment, and then takes up the concept as is from New Carrollton.   While I picked it up from an Internet posting in 2008 it's in this 2016 document.  


It doesn't show a transfer connection to a Columbia Pike line, and it has more stations, 18, between the legs of 8 Metrorail lines, which are transfer stations on the map.  Whereas the "1991" map only shows 5 interstitial stations.  This map also shows the Purple Line connecting to the west leg of the Red Line at White Flint (now North Bethesda), not the Bethesda station, which is the eastern origin point of the line under construction.  It's not clear if the map shows a connection to Dulles Airport.

(2) And so many other possibilities:
  • Making the Silver Line a Virginia only service, with a new station at Rosslyn (not recommended)
  • WRT the Beltway line, sticking with Maryland's Purple Line light rail, but also with Virginia, extending from Bethesda to Tysons, and Tysons to Merrifield and more expansion in Maryland on the south
  • Yellow Line separation once it crosses the Potomac, adding a station on the National Mall, not connecting to L'Enfant Plaza, having a transfer station at Union Station, and continuing up North Capital and Georgia Avenue to Silver Spring
  • Separated Blue Line from Rosslyn to Union Station, maybe on H Street NE or a Separated Silver Line to Union Station, and then interlining on the Orange/Blue.  (It anticipated streetcar service would be provided on H Street, therefore it didn't suggest duplication with Metrorail.)
  • Metro Center-Gallery Place and Farragut North-Farragut West underground pedestrian connections
  • Blue Line extension to Potomac Mills
  • It doesn't recommend extension to Bowie from Largo based on density and employment figures.  Below I argue that such an extension, even further to Annapolis, should be considered on economic and equity grounds, but as discussed it needs a commitment to development along that route.
  • The infill stations not previously approved are not recommended.  However, the Oklahoma Avenue station could now be justified as a result of the Washington Commanders team returning to the RFK campus, with planned ancillary development.  A St. Elizabeths station could be justified by the since relocation of the Department of Homeland Security to that site.
Extensions to Potomac Mills/Quantico
(Fairfax and Prince William Counties)

In keeping with the WMATA policy of jurisdictions being responsible for expansion planning, Fairfax County's Countywide Transit Network Study (2016) calls for extending the Blue Line to Potomac Mills in Prince William County.  

In 2021, the Virginia State Department of Rail and Public Transportation did a study (Springfield to Quantico Enhanced Public Transportation Feasibility Study) recommending extension of either the Blue or Yellow Lines to Quantico (Marine Base, CIA Training Center) and the end, also serving Fort Belvoir and Potomac Mills ("Here’s how Metro would change Prince William County development, if a Quantico extension ever happens," Washington Business Journal).

The State study said it was possible, but would take a decade or two to come about.  I prefer the Yellow Line alternative which serves the Rte. 1 Corridor, and doesn't require a big horseshoe bend to reach Fort Belvoir.

The BLOOP/Blue Line Loop, 2023

I always thought this was dumb, so I never really wrote about it.  I don't think I gave it enough credit, but I still didn't think it provided enough value.



The preferred alternative would have provided an inner ring subway service providing a new platform at Rosslyn, some new inner city stations in DC, and a connection to National Harbor in Prince George's County.  It added 8 stations in addition to transfer stations at Rosslyn, Mount Vernon Square, Union Station, and Navy Yard--useful to provide more capacity for service to the Nationals baseball stadium.

Although it called for service to Georgetown and 8 total new stations in DC, I didn't think that turning the line south from Union Station, rather than extending east from Union Station a la the original Separated Blue Line plan provided, enough value to DC.  But it's arguable.   

OTOH a connection to Georgetown and an additional connection to Union Station are of high value.  And I could be biased because I lived in the H Street NE neighborhood for many years.  I still remember my shock reading the original Post article ("Crowds could derail success," 2001, and this article which preceded it, "Coming to a Curve: Region's Subway System Begins to Show Its Age, Limits"), when we were organizing the commercial district revitalization improvement program for the neighborhood, which has had great success.

But now, serendipitously from a transit service standpoint (not for taxpayers) the forthcoming football stadium at the RFK campus would also have been served by stations on the north side of the campus, not just from the RFK-Stadium/Armory station on the south.  

National Harbor is a blot of development with a casino, in Prince George's County, along the Potomac River across from Alexandria.  It's primarily accessed by car.

Although to be fair to WMATA, the BLOOP was satisficed, not optimized, but designed to get approval from all three jurisdictions: (1) Virginia for the new Rosslyn platform; (2) DC for connections to Georgetown, additional stations east of the current system, and a new connection to Union Station; and (3) National Harbor for Maryland ("Backwardness of transportation and land use planning: National Harbor, Prince George's County, Maryland | Why isn't high capacity transit access required from the outset?").
Light Metro

Nothing on the books, but current WMATA President Randy Clarke said in this "Ask me anything" session on Youtube, that if WMATA is to expand rail services, it'd most likely be light metro, like the expanding REM system in Montreal.  

A Reseau express metropolitan (REM) train on a test run in downtown Montreal.  
Photo: Canadian Press/Christinne Muschi.

Light Metro is light rail on a dedicated track, with automation.  In Montreal it's both above ground, and below--as they took over a tunnel that had been used by regional rail. Then again, DC itself has failed with streetcars ("DC makes yet another bad decision about streetcars: will replace the one line with a so called "fancy" bus | The Vision Thing").   

Note that while REM gets a lot of attention these days, it's not a panacea ("Montreal's new, for-profit light-rail system: national model or cautionary tale?," Canadian Press) especially because the province agreed to pay the vendor 75 cents per kilometer per passenger for 99 years--that's $7.50  Canadian ($5.25 US) for a 6 mile trip.  That seems wholly unsustainable.

Other reasonable concepts for extension

Looking at the big map, I'd say you could also consider this extension but it's never been a part of any official planning.  
  • instead of rerouting the Yellow Line to Silver Spring, I'd send it out New Hampshire Avenue into Montgomery County perhaps further along Colesville Road -- this combines a couple of different ideas in various plans
  • Adding a Yellow Line station in the vicinity of Jefferson Memorial on the National Mall is enough value to separate the Yellow Line as listed in planning documents referenced above.
Conclusion.  If you don't plan for extensions or infill stations (system intensification) you don't get them.  If you propose dumb ones you don't get them either.  If you propose and plan for good additions to the transit infrastructure, with a jurisdiction in support, you'll get them.

But because it always costs much more to wait, it's better to move forward more quickly.  Costs balloon up to 5x or more if you don't.

WRT the various iterations of official plans of some sort (plus some of my own) this is what I would have prioritized, recognizing that my bias is on intensification of adding stations in the core, which is likely to result in the greatest amount of new ridership.
  • A Wheaton-Georgetown-Manassas Line serving Columbia Pike, with 12 stations, including Georgetown and Kennedy Center
This would provide 7 new stations in DC, and would support intensification in the Columbia Pike corridor.  Southern Tower apartments would finally get their Metrorail connection.

(We won't talk about the failed Columbia Pike Streetcar project, "Arlington officials halt efforts on streetcars for Columbia Pike, Crystal City." Washington Post.)
  • Separated Blue (or Silver) Line
This would provide new platforms/connections at Rosslyn and Union Station, service to Georgetown and to the H Street NE corridor, which given the forthcoming stadium for the Washington Commanders at the RFK campus, adds transit capacity to a future high in demand destination.

My Separated Silver Line concept does this, but also adds stations along Arlington Boulevard in Arlington, which is also an intensification move.  Same with a potential leg north on Bladensburg Road potentially into Prince George's County.
  • Various line extensions
Shady Grove to Germantown, Orange Line to Fair Oaks, etc., make sense to me.  Counties should be looking out for their interests, and at least doing scoping to determine if such extensions make sense. 

Like what Fairfax County did with its transportation plan, calling for a Blue Line extension.  As the "not recommended" language in the 2016 plan makes clear, these areas need more population and employment density to justify the extension.

But, if you don't plan for them, they certainly won't happen.
  • Orange Line to Annapolis:  Also an economic development equity move
It's far, 28 miles from New Carrollton.  

But it's an important regional destination, especially being the State Capital, given limited bus service and no railroad service,  adding connections to Bowie on route, setting up the conditions for intensification, etc.  (Hell if we're really dreaming then you could do a Metrorail line from Annapolis to Baltimore, or alternatively a new Baltimore Subway Line to Annapolis, 30 miles.)

I went to a conference in Annapolis in 2005 and people were opposing a new development there because of how much motor vehicle traffic it would generate.  I was thinking, "this is so much different from DC, because you can build this close to a Metrorail station and generate so much less automobile traffic."

It could also be prioritized on economic development equity grounds ("D.C.-area leaders consider prioritizing equity in transportation and land use planning," Washington Post).  Like most regions, the economic center of the Washington region continues to shift West ("A Region Divided: The State of Growth in Greater Washington, D.C." Brookings).  This would provide the ability to intensify and refocus development on the East side of the metropolitan area.

Prince George's would have to finally prioritize transit oriented development to make this work for them.


Also it would connect to the Purple Line, and if the Purple Line were extended from New Carrollton to Alexandria, it would be even better.

Would it be cool if Metrorail were extended to Annapolis, and Baltimore Subway to Annapolis, ideally as part of a greater plan ("Transit planning in Baltimore").
  • Purple Line.  
A circumferential line would not have generated the kind of ridership necessary to justify the cost of heavy rail, unless like how the Moscow subway is prioritized by the national government, it was funded regardless of strict economics.  However sections in Virginia probably would have generated decent ridership as the line would reach underserved areas.  The Purple Line light rail is a good alternative.


I do think planning for further phases, especially in Prince George's County, and from Bethesda to Tysons should be initiated.  Definitely from New Carrollton to Alexandria.  PG County should make the latter one of its top economic development priorities. 
  • Yellow Line from Fort Totten up New Hampshire Avenue into Montgomery County and then on Colesville Road
This is my concept, never has been studied formally.  It's a way to serve an intensifying corridor and major employment centers like White Oak, and would connect to the Purple Line light rail at Takoma/Langley Crossroads. 

(A blogger at Greater Greater Washington suggested an alternative going up Georgia Avenue to Silver Spring.  To me, it would make more sense if it were extended beyond that station.  "Imagine a Separate Yellow Line."  And I'm not sure you can get the intensification benefits, without going to an Arlington Planned Unit Development underlying property upzone.)
  • BLOOP
I never gave it a chance.  Basically it's an inner circumferential line.  It would be in DC's favor, adding service to unserved areas like Georgetown, connecting Rosslyn to DC, adding new transfer stations at Union Station and Navy Yard (Washington Nationals Stadium) and stations in both the NW and SE quadrants.  Plus it provides subway service to some locations in PG County, including National Harbor.
  • Extension to Quantico by either the Blue or Yellow Lines
Not my ballgame.  It's super polycentric and exurban.  But it will reach some major employment centers and could provide some interesting opportunities for in-line transit service if more stations are added in certain places, comparable to intra-Arlington County ridership between Rosslyn and Virginia Square Stations.  Nonethess for Fairfax and Prince William Counties, it could be a top economic development and transportation planning priority ("Reimagining Potomac Mills: County’s draft comprehensive plan envisions big things for Prince William’s busiest mall," Prince William Times).

Labels: , , , ,

WMATA's 50th anniversary from the start of service, Part 2a | The Original Approved Metrorail System (1968-1970)

This is part of a series.

-- "Reprint with editing: Today WMATA Metrorail's 50th anniversary from the start of service | Part 1: many lessons can be found, if you look"
-- "WMATA's 50th anniversary from the start of service, Part 2a | The Original Approved Metrorail System (1968-1970)"
-- "WMATA's 50th anniversary from the start of service, Part 2b | Lessons learned: Proposed expansions and the Metrorail system we don't have"
-- "WMATA's 50th anniversary from the start of service, Part 3 | Stations"
-- "WMATA's 50th anniversary from the start of service, Part 4 | Buses"
-- "WMATA's 50th anniversary from the start of service | Part 5: Making a better transit network | Connecting heavy rail + light rail + railroad -- a concept for New York City 

Recently I acquired a copy of the February 1976 issue of "Metro Notes", a tabloid published by WMATA throughout the construction process.  The Approved Plan Map (1968-1970) shows the current system, with 11 potential extensions.  Three were constructed:  (1) two Blue Line stations from Addison Road to Largo; (2) one station from Rockville to Shady Grove on the Red Line; and (3) the Silver Line.  

Two infill stations were later added, NoMA on the Red Line ("Having Turned a Corner, Washington’s NoMa Is Coming Alive," New York Times) and Potomac Yards on the Blue/Yellow Line ("Metro's New Potomac Yard-VT Station Is Open. Here's What to Know," NBC).  

The Map is below and also on my Flickr feed.

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, March 27, 2026

Urban Land Institute Technical Advisory Panel report for the Uptown neighborhood of Minneapolis

ULI is an organization of developers and other stakeholders involved in real estate development.  They have regional chapters and an annual meeting.  The Institute publishes a magazine and has an extensive publishing program, complemented by reports and works produced by the individual chapters.

Their books and reports are top notch, and read well over the years.  I've been fortunate to be able to get "media credentials" to attend local meetings, even the national, but I haven't been able to go.

Technical Advisory Panels bring together a group of members selected as knowledge experts to come up with ideas for knotty problems in communities, usually with a focus on commercial development.  (The American Planning Association, American Society of Landscape Architects, and American Public Transportation Association have similar programs.)

While years ago I found the report on what to do for DC's Central Library wanting--it illustrated a problem with planning engagements more generally, if you're given a limited scope, your ability to be visionary and expansive is significantly constrained--generally the reports are top notch, and always worth reading to boost your knowledge and get new ideas.  

WRT the library, I had better ideas ("The DC Central Library, the Civic identity and the public realm," 2011, "Civic assets and mixed use: Central Library edition," 2013).  But generally, ULI hits a lot more home runs on TAPs than strikeouts.

The Minneapolis Star-Tribune reports ("Five great ideas to improve Uptown, the Twin Cities’ most enduring commercial hub") on the release of a report (UPTOWN REBOUND: A STORY OF ABUNDANCE) for the Uptown District.  

I haven't read it yet, the ST columnist highlights five points:

  • Form a business improvement district
Gosh, this is so basic it's amazing cities have to be told.  The overarching city government generally lacks the capacity and funding to provide extranormal management and development of a city's subdistricts.  BIDs are one tool.  Main Street programs another.  And Pennsylvania has come up with a Main Street like program for neighborhoods.

-- "Basic planning building blocks for urban commercial district revitalization programs that most cities haven't packaged: Part 1 | The first six," (2020)
-- "Basic planning building blocks for urban commercial district revitalization programs that most cities haven't packaged: Part 2 |  A neighborhood identity and marketing toolkit (kit of parts)," (2020)
-- "Basic planning building blocks for urban commercial district revitalization programs that most cities haven't packaged: Part 3 | The overarching approach: destination development/branding and identity, layering and daypart planning," (2020)
-- "Basic planning building blocks for "community" revitalization programs that most cities haven't packaged: Part 4 | Place evaluation tools," (2020)
-- "Planning programming by daypart, month, season: and Boston Winter Garden, DC's Holiday Market, etc.," (2016)
-- "Richard's Rules for Restaurant (Food) Based Revitalization, Salt Lake City and DC's Chinatown," (2024)
-- "Commercial district activation issues in smaller communities: Phoenixville, Pennsylvania," (2023)

Turns out Minneapolis has a real estate firm that works on activating spaces in a curated fashion ("Max Musicant's company brings commercial spaces to life," MST).

  • Buy the Seven Points parking ramp
Photo: Eric Roper, MST.

They call parking structures ramps in Minnesota.  But owning one provides a revenue stream and a way to support parking management strategies, in a manner that can bootstrap what I call a transportation management district.  

The TAP suggests it provide free parking, but as the foundation of a shared parking system throughout the district.

  • Create a "Lake Loop" connecting Uptown to the Chain of Lakes
Lake Loop concept.  Graphic: Blake Siette, ULI.

Minneapolis is defined by its network of parks, trails, and lakes.  Apparently Uptown isn't well connected to the existing network.  
  • Rebrand Girard Avenue as "Uptown Alley"
Apparently the street is broken up here and there by more pedestrianized spaces.  The Panel recommends that this characteristic be strengthened, by converting the Avenue into a continuous people space (no cars).

Photo: Eric Roper, MST.

I think such proposals are great.  But then you really do need a BID because to be successful, such spaces need to be highly programmed and managed.

As it is, Minneapolis already has problems adequately managing Nicolett Mall ("The trouble with Nicollet Mall: It’s boring now," MST, "How to Fix Nicollet Mall," MPLS St. Paul Magazine, "Nicollet Mall needs bikes and other wheeled wanderers," MinnPost).

-- "Planning urban design improvements at the neighborhood scale: Dupont Circle, DC," (2019)
-- "More about making 17th Street between P and R a pedestrian space on weekends," (2019)
-- "Planning for place/urban design/neighborhoods versus planning for transportation modes: new 17th Street NW bike lanes | Walkable community planning versus "pedestrian" planning," (2021)
-- "Now I know why Boulder's Pearl Street Mall is the exception that proves the rule about the failures of pedestrian malls," (2005)

  • Extend the Como-Harriet Streetcar.
Apparently it's a historic streetcar operated by volunteers during the summer, on weekends.  It runs between the Lake Harriet Bandshell and a stop in front of Lakewood Cemetery. 

I didn't know they had one.  Similar streetcars operate or have operated in Dallas, Memphis, and Savannah.   

But the reporter says it could go further into Uptown and connect to the Midtown Greenway, a major cycle trail in a "ditch" that had been a railroad.  

He quotes the director of the Trolley Museum, saying they don't have the capacity or the money (an estimated $10 million) to do it.  How about not making the parking ramp free, and using some of the revenues to pay for the streetcar extension and perhaps expansion to Friday service.

Conclusion.  I definitely have to read the report.  But I can make a quick "judgement" based on the recommendations pulled out by Eric Roper (also see his article, "Momentum is building for a rebirth of Uptown").  

The report suggests multiple ways to increase access to and connectedness within the Uptown district, in part by leveraging existing resources.

Seems like a lot of exciting ideas.  I am looking forward to reading it.

Labels: , , , ,