Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space

"A community’s physical form, rather than its land uses, is its most intrinsic and enduring characteristic." [Katz, EPA] This blog focuses on place and placemaking and all that makes it work--historic preservation, urban design, transportation, asset-based community development, arts & cultural development, commercial district revitalization, tourism & destination development, and quality of life advocacy--along with doses of civic engagement and good governance watchdogging.

Monday, July 28, 2025

Trump's executive order on homelessness

I had been thinking about writing about homelessness, or at least adding to the comments in my "Quote of the day: homelessness" entry from 2022, because of the Seattle Times article, "Homeless people visited ER less after moving into King County’s hotels."

The concept of "housing first" is based on the idea that putting people in a more stable housing situation, regardless of whether or not they continue to partake in drugs and alcohol or exhibit mental illness, they are easier to help, and it saves the government money, even if it doesn't fit with moral, "you should stop," concepts about who "deserves" help and who doesn't.

Then Trump came out with an executive order ("Ending crime and disorder on America’s streets") changing federal policy on homelessness, towards the "moral" side, not the practical evidence-based policy side.  Among other elements it bans encampments on public space, something he has no control over unless it is federal property.

From the Los Angeles Daily News article "Trump’s crackdown on homelessness: What does it mean for California?," 

Trump doesn’t want to stop at banning homeless encampments and pushing people into treatment, and that’s where he and Newsom diverge: The president wants to upend two core tenets of California’s homelessness policy. 

Trump wants to abolish federal support for “housing first,” which is the idea that homeless individuals should get housing even if they are still using drugs, and “harm reduction,” which focuses on preventing overdoses and otherwise making drug use safer. Both tenets are backed by research and have been the gold standard in California — and at the federal level — for years.

Groups are concerned that their systems of program delivery for homeless services will no longer qualify for federal funds.  From the LADN:

Trump’s order also prioritizes committing more people to institutions from the street. The order seeks to make it easier to commit people with mental illness who can’t care for themselves, while also promising grants and other assistance to help ramp up commitments, and threatening to divert funding away from places that don’t push people into treatment facilities “to the maximum extent permitted by law.” It also promises to prioritize funding to expand mental health courts and drug courts. 

The likelihood of federal monies being provided to local and state governments to deal with mental illness in this way is remote given the cutbacks in other programs like Medicaid.

=====

I can't remember what article I read, but it made the point that the overall counts of homeless people done by local governments include people who are housed in domiciles in which they are guests.  While I knew that, it accounts for research finding that a majority of the homeless don't have substance abuse or mental health issues ("Here's what largest study in decades of California homelessness found," San Francisco Chronicle)..

The fact is that the etiology of street homelessness is different than homeless in temporary housing.

More seniors are homeless.  The major point of the LA Times column "Trump’s order on homelessness gets it all wrong, and here’s why," is that despite reports showing a stabilization of numbers in the homeless population, the mix is changing and that more seniors are finding themselves unhoused because of income and high housing costs, not from behavioral issues.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, May 09, 2023

DC Public Safety Summit, Wednesday May 10th, 9am

I'm the first to say I don't know how to reduce violent crime other than ensuring police time is spent in the areas with the most crime, and that crimes involving gun possession be prosecuted diligently.

Recently, DC Police Chief Robert Contee said that the average person arrested for homicide in the city has been arrested 11 times before.  Similarly, homicide victims have a high rate of involvement with the criminal justice system.  It's pretty clear that a small number of people are responsible for a lot of crime.

Charlie has called our attention to the DC Crime Facts e-letter, and the site provides a lot of analysis about crime in the city.

DCCF has also alerted us to a "public safety summit" tomorrow, convened by Mayor Bowser, and bringing a lot of public officials to the table, with citizens invited.

Wednesday, May 10 at 9:00 a.m. 
District Emergency Operations Center 1015 Half Street SE, 10th Floor

Officials Attending:

Mayor Muriel Bowser 
Brooke Pinto, Ward 2 Councilmember, Chair, Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety 
Lindsey Appiah, Acting Deputy Mayor for Public Safety and Justice 
Robert J. Contee, III, Chief of Police, Metropolitan Police Department  
Matthew Graves, United States Attorney for the District of Columbia 
Brian Schwalb, Attorney General for the District of Columbia 
Anita Josey-Herring, Chief Judge, DC Superior Court 
Linda Harllee Harper, Executive Director, DC Offices of Neighborhood Safety and Engagement and Gun Violence Prevention 
Kristy Love, Executive Director, Criminal Justice Coordinating Council  

It will be broadcast live on the city's cable television channel.

DCCF has a post, "Questions for Mayor Bowser's Public Safety Summit," providing lots of questions to be asked of the public officials.  It's pretty focused and trenchant and worth a read.  

He points out that arrests are down in the most dangerous parts of the city, and that areas of high crime have 300% to 400% more crime and incidents than "safe areas," but safe areas are overstaffed relative to crime.

What about a real Citizen Summit on Crime?  I doubt that much will come of the summit, as it was announced the day before, and there is no posted agenda.  But it also reminds me of something that Mayor Anthony Williams did two or three years running.  They were called Citizen Summits and were designed, theoretically, to get citizen insights into city policy and budget.

They got more publicity, including in the planning press, than they deserved.  I was critical that they were mostly window dressing, but I did attend one, and if they were organized to engage people in substantive ways, they could be very effective.

I would have an agenda, provide "education time" so people can be exposed to best practice insights,  featuring well known academics and other professionals, and go from there.

Academic insight.  Patrick Sharkey has written Uneasy Peace: The Great Crime Decline, the Renewal of City Life, and the Next War on Violence,  about the pre-covid crime drop and attributed a fair amount of it to citizen participation in community efforts to reduce crime.  

Alex Vitale takes a different tack, focused on overpolicing and criminalization of social issues in End of Policing.  It's provocative and worth reading, although maybe not relevant to the murder and gun problems.

-- "The opportunity to rearticulate public safety delivery keeps being presented: Rochester New York" (2021)

There is the broken windows approach.  

-- "Broken windows/collective efficacy: Baltimore; Newark; Grand Junction, Colorado; Pittsburgh; Albany" (2019)

A lot of academics criticize it, but I think they are missing the point.  BW never really got implemented, instead it was transmogrified into "zero tolerance policing" not community policing and improvement.

-- "George Kelling, co-creator of the "Broken WIndows" thesis, dies" (2019)
-- "The state of "broken windows" versus "problem oriented policing" strategies in 2016: Part 1, theory and practice," 2016
-- "The state of "broken windows" versus "problem oriented policing" strategies in 2016: Part 2, what to do"
-- "Night-time safety: rethinking lighting in the context of a walking community," 2014
-- Crime prevention through environmental design and repeated burglaries at the Naylor Gardens apartment complex," 2013

Herman Goldstein (deceased), wrote a lot about "problem-oriented policing."

And there is a lot of work on "violence interruption."  I go back and forth about it, but there is some potential there.

But basically there needs to be a place-based approach to the most dangerous areas in the city, something I wrote about in terms of equity planning and social urbanism.  

-- "Social urbanism and equity planning as a way to address crime, violence, and persistent poverty: (not in) DC" (2021)
-- "Creating 'community safety partnership neighborhood management programs as a management and mitigation strategy for public nuisances: Part 3 (like homeless shelters)" (2020)

I think that Mayor Bowser has bobbled the issue for years. And I don't see things changing.

Note that William Bratton's latest book is very good ("Bill Bratton Explains His Ideas of Good Policing," New York Times).

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, March 31, 2023

I can't think of a worse idea: nonprofit suggests building homeless shelter in San Diego's Balboa Park

Art map.

San Diego's Balboa Park is a 1200 acre culture and parks complex, including 17 museums, the San Diego Zoo, and a variety of public gardens.  Built to host the 1915–16 Panama–California Exposition, later it hosted the 1935–36 California Pacific International Exposition.

With the rise in homelessness, spurred both by a rise in the cost of housing and the pandemic, public camping has increased significantly, and public parks and trails are often used as encampment sites, creating significant problems for many communities, which lack the financial and other resources to build the amount of housing and programs required to fully address the problem.

Posting on the Nextdoor community information system.

Here in Salt Lake City homeless camping in public parks has been a huge problem--at Liberty Park, a bit lesser problem at Fairmont Park. And is a problem at other city parks as well.

I was surprised to see that the Lucky Duck Foundation and separately a City Council member have suggested building tent shelters at Balboa Park, each capable of housing 500 people ("Balboa Park groups oppose proposed homeless shelter, saying it would be a violation of city, state rules," San Diego Union Tribune).

San Diego City Councilmember Stephen Whitburn has suggested the Inspiration Point parking lot in Balboa Park could serve as a possible site for a large, safe campground or other homeless services. His proposal has the support of Mayor Todd Gloria, but has not yet had a hearing before the full council.

The philanthropic Lucky Duck Foundation also has suggested the eight-acre lot at Interstate 5 and Park Boulevard as a site for large tented shelters that could accommodate about 500 people.

In planning I talk about its purpose being "designing conflict out" instead of designing a program that from the outset creates ongoing conflict.  

While I know that dealing with homelessness and shelters is more a management and program issue ("Creating 'community safety partnership neighborhood management programs as a management and mitigation strategy for public nuisances"), I can't think of something worse than putting a homeless shelter in a major park.  Unless there is a major set of programs and services for the patrons, which would limit their hanging out in the park.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, December 28, 2022

Urbanism obituaries, 2022 | Death clusters of people, buildings and organizations as an indicator of institutional failure

Recently, I thought about demolition of historic buildings in cities like Detroit as deaths, and that they were worthy of a listing in my annual article on "Urbanism-related Obituaries (2022)." I have listed failures of retail businesses like Sears or Debenhams, why not buildings?

But then I thought that there was a difference between deaths of individuals and systemic, institutional failure.  And that this type of death should be called out in a different entry.

 Homeless Deaths from Exposure. We can't really blame this on cities.  

Homelessness concentrates in cities because there are more people, housing is more expensive, and people migrate to cities because they are more likely to offer social services.  But multiple reports made me realize that we need to think about this even more ("Hundreds of homeless people died on Orange County’s streets in 2022," Orange County Register; "At least 77 people died homeless in nation’s capital this year," Washington Post; "This year, at least 159 homeless Utahns died. The death toll is likely higher, officials say," Salt Lake Tribune).

Readers have called our attention to the book, Homelessness is a Housing Problem, which I haven't yet tracked down ("Is homelessness a housing problem? Two Seattle experts make their case in new book," Seattle Times).

Traffic-related deaths. There are more traffic deaths outside of cities than within cities, because traffic tends to move more slowly within cities.  

Since covid, traffic related fatalities are on the rise ("With traffic deaths on the rise, psychologists are being called on to make driving safer," APA). They had been on a decline before that.

Then again, it depends on whether or not motor vehicle operators are conscious of pedestrians and bicyclists.  Coming to Utah, it's a poster child for sprawl, and the mobility paradigm is centered on the car.  In fact, two of the top ten car dealership groups are based here, one sold for $3.2 billion (although they have dealerships in states other than Utah).  The state is an oil producer, and has at least five oil refineries, so it is super committed to a gasoline-centric land use and transportation planning paradigm.

Blue ribbons were tied to trees along the walking route to Bonneville Elementary School on 1900 South in Salt Lake City.

Recently a child was killed at an intersection a few blocks away (" School community mourns loss of 11-year-old girl after crosswalk crash," KSL-TV).  

There was no reason for it.  The sight lines are fine, there aren't problems with the pavement quality or intersection, there is a traffic signal.  The driver said "I didn't see her."

I've come to believe that "I didn't see her" really means "I didn't look."

This is a problem in cities that promote more trips by walking, transit, and biking, in that there is little education or emphasis on training motor vehicle operators to be a lot more aware and responsible for their acts.

-- "A more radical approach to "Vision Zero" is needed: reconstructing streets out of different materials to reduce speeds," 2019
-- "Vision Zero mea culpa in DC," 2022

Salt Lake has lots of car-light rail accidents, and the state experiences weird killings of bicyclists by drivers, and many pedestrian deaths 

Drug overdose related deaths. I had no idea, but more people die in most cities from drug overdoses, not murders ("Drug overdoses now kill more Americans than guns," CBS News, "Overdose Deaths Continue Rising, With Fentanyl and Meth Key Culprits," New York Times).  

The cynical part of me thinks that this outcome is cheaper than trying to address the problem.  Although to be fair to public health departments, many do address it.

But it's hard because some of the logical ways of addressing it are politically fraught ("https://chicago.suntimes.com/2022/12/27/23517734/opioid-overdoses-prevention-sites-safe-injection-west-side-tanya-sorrell-lashawn-ford-op-ed," Chicago Sun-Times).

Demolitions of historically significant buildings.  I've written for years that demolition of buildings is seen as a solution, but in weak markets, just creates a different kind of nuisance, that of an empty lot.

One of the buildings demolished in Detroit this year is the headquarters for the American Motors Corporation (AMC).  

(Interestingly, I've been reading a biography of George Romney--The story of George Romney: builder, salesman, crusader--who headed AMC before he went on to become Governor of Michigan and later a candidate for President.  He was Mitt Romney's father and frankly, I think George was a much more principled person.)

Originally it was the HQ for the Kelvinator refrigerator company, with the main manufacturing plant behind.  

When the company merged with Nash Motors and became Nash-Kelvinator it became the headquarters for the combined corporation, and remained so when the company merged with Hudson Motors, and later when it was renamed American Motors.

I can't imagine a new building being constructed in its place will have the kind of architectural stature of this building ("AMC Headquarters redevelopment advances with brownfield plan approval," Detroit News).

Another article discussed the demolition of an apartment building next to a neighborhood park ("Demolition on abandoned Detroit apartment begins Tuesday," Fox2 TV).  It's doubly ironic.  

First, the building was called out as a potential anchor in a neighborhood revitalization plan only four years ago.  

Second, apartment buildings are a great way to leverage the place value of parks in terms of adding residents and increasing property values.  The likelhihood of that vacant lot being filled with a new building in a weak real estate market like Detroit is remote.

In fact, I think about this all the time, wrt Salt Lake City and the park of which I am on the board, and how buildings across the street could be comparable to how apartment buildings line the streets across from parks in New York City.

In short, while it takes a lot of work to restore a vacant historic building, in most instances, the place values (see the book Economics of Uniqueness: Investing in Historic City Cores and Cultural Heritage Assets for Sustainable Development) are so much greater than if they are ever replaced.

Cities need to be more innovative and work harder on this.

Photo: Tom Gralish, Philadelphia Inquirer.

Demise of arts organizations. It turns out that it looks like the Philadelphia Pops Orchestra isn't going to shutter ("Philly Pops musicians and management reach tentative agreement for new contracts," Philadelphia Inquirer).  It was on the verge ("The Philly Pops is shutting down, leaders say:  This season's Christmas concerts will be the Philly Pops' last," PI), and there was a great article about how the shutdown would have significant negative impact on the music element of the performing arts ecosystem in Philadelphia ("Philly Pops fun is going away. What happens next for the arts is serious business," PI).

I've been writing about these kinds of recurring failures for almost 20 years, seeing multiple organizational failures in DC, and recognizing that these weren't one-off problems, but indicators of systemic and structural problems in how communities plan and fund arts and cultural institutions.

-- "Cultural resources planning in DC: In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king," 2007
-- "What would be a "Transformational Projects Action Plan" for DC's cultural ecosystem," 2019
-- "A comprehensive list of funding sources for arts and culture," 2019

Most cities fail when it comes to a systemic approach.

To me, a key element is an "early warning" system so that groups can be helped when they fall into trouble to begin with, not when they are about to close, lose their facilities, etc.

Demise of retail businesses, national and local.  I've included listings of retail businesses that fail in the urbanism obituaries for years.  But it deserves mention in this piece.  

Cities need to have early warning systems to deal with this going forward especially now, because post-covid it's that much harder for independent businesses to succeed, yet those are the businesses that enliven central and neighborhood business districts.  

We saw a recent edition of PBS News Hour and they ran a story on small retailers, "Small retailers find ways to adapt amid pandemic and online shopping convenience," featuring a store we used to frequent in Takoma Park Maryland called Table, a housewares store.  They closed their Dupont Circle store in DC, because it was experiencing much less foot traffic, while the neighborhood focused store kept its patronage steady.  

Not that I haven't been writing about those issues for the past 20 years...

-- "From more space to socially distance to a systematic program for pedestrian districts (Park City (Utah) Main Street Car Free on Sundays)," 2020
-- "What is the competitive advantage for the post-covid city? Doubling down on place values," 2022 (this entry has 20+ links to other posts)

Deaths of newspapers. Mention this a lot.  Newspaper readership is associated with participation in local civic affairs.  But printed newspapers have been declining for a long time, first because of the consolidation of local business into large companies that didn't need to advertise, and then the demise of local companies (other than car dealers), and second by the Internet, when people tossed newspaper subscriptions in favor of information from the web and/or stopped reading "quality information" altogether.

This article, "Newspapers are disappearing where democracy needs them most" (Washington Post) mentions the mapping of "newspaper deserts."

-- "Newspapers as public media: WBEZ, radio, an NPR affiliate, to merge with the Chicago Sun-Times," 2022

School closures ("National Community Planning Month: Schools as neighborhood anchors," 2022).  I have a number of entries about how urban planning is upside down in that elementary schools are usually fundamental anchors to healthy neighborhoods, but our planning system does not recognize or prioritize this, and many school planning precepts take actions that actively contravene this.

Recognition of the need for school support, that school support = neighborhood support.  There are stories about school closure planning in Oakland, California ("In Oakland, closing schools opens questions about a city’s soul," Washington Post).  
 

What amazed me about the situation is that Oakland has lots of charter schools ("How Charter Schools Became Such a Big Player in California's Education System," KQED/NPR), and they drew off enrollment from the traditional schools, so those schools started failing, in turn having negative impact on neighborhood based schools.  

This is a problem in DC too.  Student enrollment hasn't grown that much, but the number of schools has skyrocketed, because charter schools can pretty much open regardless of enrollment trends.

One way to think of this is as mitigation.  If new schools are allowed to draw off students, and schools in neighborhoods are key neighborhood assets, then the negative impact on neighborhood schools needs to be mitigated proactively.

Salt Lake is about to go through a series of school closures ("Millions wasted as Salt Lake City school board fails to close elementaries," Salt Lake Tribune).  Reporting has not embraced the concept that I promote, that some schools need to be preserved as neighborhood stabilization measures--recognizing that some schools will close.  Not to mention that organized parent groups vociferously fight closure.

The fact is that household sizes are decreasing and Salt Lake City and County were national outliers in having a high rate of households with children.  That's changing, and there are "too many" schools or schools in the wrong places, as different parts of the County and the school districts go through growth and contraction.  Although it happens that schools in my particular area have burgeoning enrollments.

For example, I went to school in Oakland County, Michigan, one of the nation's richest counties.  When I was in high school, many area school districts had two or three high schools.  Now, many of those cities have closed at least one, and the current enrollment of the one school is significantly less than peak enrollment for one school.  But I looked up the population numbers, and the county actually has 200,000+ more residents than it did when I was in high school.  Demographic trends mean smaller numbers of school aged children.

Library defunding. Not many examples of this.  Libraries at least in the US, open more than they close.  But a rural community in Michigan has defunded its library because it has "gay books" ("Only library in Michigan town to close after voters defund it for refusing to ban LGBTQ books,").  

In the meantime, donations have kept the library open ("LGBTQ-friendly library receives another mind-blowing donation to stay open amid homophobic protest," Queerty).

Libraries are under threat in many communities across the country over similar issues, increasingly with the support of national organizations and initiatives ("Template for attack on LGBTQ books replicated in Central Oregon," Oregon Public Broadcasting).

This is a scary indicator of the power of conservatives to cancel and defund public goods. Who are the real snowflakes?

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Monday, August 08, 2022

Macrofortification

A couple decades ago I saw a presentation at the National Building Museum by Camilo José Vergara, who specializes in photographing urban decay, showing photos of Los Angeles, including what he called "micro-fortification" of housings around pipes and stuff.  

He was very critical, arguing it demonstrated a grim, anti-people approach.

I said that it wasn't about being mean but about reducing vandalism and theft.

The Seattle Times has an article, "Illegally placed concrete blocks have taken over public parking in Seattle. Why are they there?," about guerilla public safety protection measures, where people (business and residents) and placing one and two ton concrete blocks in parking spaces, to prevent large scale use by homeless RV operators.

Flowers brighten one in a line of ecology blocks on South Homer Street in Seattle’s Georgetown neighborhood in May. People living in RVs are having a harder time finding parking because of the illegally placed barriers. (Steve Ringman / The Seattle Times)

Yes it's illegal.  But it's an indicator that present laws, regulations, and public safety enforcement and protection systems aren't working, when citizens are driven to extrajudicial measures such as these.

Joe Ingram, right, with the Interfaith Task Force on Homelessness, offers his services to Seattle parking enforcement officers as they place notices on RVs parked in Seattle’s Georgetown neighborhood. Ingram does vehicle residency outreach. (Steve Ringman / The Seattle Times)

The solution is creating RV camps.  Seattle has done that with tents, but there have been problems too. It wouldn't be a great solution, it would require 24 hour on site management, but it would get people off the street.  At the same time, laws would have to be changed to disallow such vehicles to be on the street for more than 12 hours, in order to "force" them into RV sites.


RVs line South Hardy Street next to Ruby Chow Park in Seattle’s Georgetown neighborhood in May. The city told the nearly two dozen RV dwellers they had to move but with parking scarce homeless residents wondered where they could go. (Steve Ringman / The Seattle Times)

Plus they'd have to be required to do basic clean up maintenance.  The way that the areas become extremely degraded because of lack of care and sanitation around the RVs now is why people are up in arms.

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, July 26, 2022

Quote of the day: homelessness

The Los Angeles Times ran a series of articles on a 22 year old pregnant homeless woman in Los Angeles County.

-- "Pregnant, Homeless and Living in a Tent, Meet Mckenzie"
-- "Letters to the Editor: Homeless, addicted, pregnant — how can a failed city like L.A. possibly fix this?"

From the article:

Mckenzie’s family came out of poverty in Louisiana’s Cajun Country, and for three generations had been buffeted by domestic violence, mental illness and homelessness, and caught up in child welfare cases. Her mother, Cynthia “Mama Cat” Trahan, was taken from her mom at age 5 and placed in foster care. Mckenzie and Cat were homeless on and off during her childhood, and Mckenzie was also put in foster care. 

Young adults who age out of foster care after such heightened trauma are at serious risk of repeating the cycle of homelessness and losing their kids to foster care. It’s an ominous harbinger for Los Angeles, where multigenerational homelessness is not uncommon — and the system is not equipped to meet the needs of people with such profound struggles.

The Quote:

“The homeless system is not designed to address and unpack all of the other systemic failures that have led somebody to where they are today,” said Heidi Marston, who resigned in May as executive director of the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority.

I have made this point before, that people often have pretty simplistic ideas about nasty developers etc.being the reason for homelessness.

But homelessness is mostly a product of profound poverty, often multigenerational, and all the physical, mental, and social health issues that are associated with it.

And the cost of dealing with that is a lot more than "merely" the cost of providing housing.  And it's ongoing.

Not to mention the ongoing dis-coordination between agencies and programs.  Even with case worker assistance, a lot is expected of the program participants, and they tend to be people that don't handle program hiccups very well, which is compounded by poor planning at times by the agencies, and the failure to provide an adequate level of coordinated help.

Labels:

Thursday, November 18, 2021

Hunger and Homelessness Awareness Week -- November 13th - 21st

-- Hunger and Homeless Awareness Week

The Orange County Register is running articles throughout the week on the topic as it relates to their county.

Past blog entries:

-- "President Biden's Infrastructure Program: Part 1: Homelessness," 2021
-- Associated Press story on homelessness in Western U.S. cities," 2017
-- "One of the "solutions" to the crisis of homelessness is a lot more SRO housing," 2017
-- "One potential solution to the problem of "finding work" for homeless adults," 2017
-- "Another example of the need for social housing organizations to construct social housing at scale," 2019
-- "Creating 'community safety partnership neighborhood management programs as a management and mitigation strategy for public nuisances: Part 3 (like homeless shelters)," 2020

One of the things that bothers me about people's remonstrations about new residential development is that "it isn't affordable."

By definition new housing delivered today is built at today's costs for land, materials, and labor.  How would it not be the most expensive housing available on the market today?

The US developed a system where the private sector is the primary actor building housing.  

As early as the 1930s, the federal government's policy makers recognized that "the market" couldn't build housing for low income segments of the market without subsidy.  But for the most part, elected and appointed officials weren't interested in supporting alternatives to the private sector in general.  And for the most part, subsidies weren't provided, therefore low income/social/affordable housing wasn't constructed.

Planning hindrances to affordability.  Another reason why social housing isn't produced "all that much" is that our planning systems aren't designed to produce it ("Community planning, capitalism, and housing/real estate development," 2020). 

1.  The biggest restriction is on height of buildings.  This causes great opportunity costs as units not built today cost more to build tomorrow.  A lot of conservatives criticize "government" and zoning regulations for causing the problem.  But really such limits are a response to resident fears about density -- nimbyism.  

2.  Sure, there might be "inclusionary zoning" requirements on new construction, where a small set of units of new developments are set aside for lower income segments of the market.

3. The real need is to produce social housing at scale.  Vienna ("Learning from Vienna and from Vienna's Social Housing Model," 2013), Stockholm ("Why Stockholm's 1930s Housing Projects Are Now in High Demand," Bloomberg), Singapore ("Why Singapore Has One of the Highest Home Ownership Rates," Bloomberg), and the UK, among others did this.  Vienna and Singapore still do.  The others not so much.

4.  One way to do this and to have it mixed in within existing communities would be to allocate some lots for multiunit housing to 100% affordable/social housing developments.  Cities like Helsinki do this.

5.  Another restriction usually is the banning of "single room occupancy" buildings, smaller units, often rented by the week or month, with shared bathrooms and limited kitchen facilities.

Yesterday, I came across this postcard, postmarked 1925, featuring the 1800 unit YMCA Hotel in Chicago "for transient men."  The existence of such housing today would go a long way towards addressing homelessness.

I doubt that DC has as many as 1,800 units of SRO housing, while Chicago had that much in a single building!

6.  A simple way to add housing is to encourage accessory dwelling units -- carriage houses, basement apartments, etc. -- as part of existing houses/lots.  For example, DC has the capacity to add 10,000 to 30,000 housing units from such measures.

But too many communities either prevent such housing altogether or impose artificial limits that severely limit supply.  DC is one of the places with arbitrary limits.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, October 09, 2021

Philadelphia Mural Arts project uses public art as a way to reduce disorder at Chestnut Street station

I think I've ridden heavy rail in Philadelphia, but it was a long time ago.  

I don't remember ever being in the Broad Street Line's Walnut Street station, which based on this WHYY/NPR article, "Mural Arts paid homeless artists to paint 200 columns underneath Broad Street," has a huge expanse of a mezzanine above the track platforms. (Also see "Mural Arts program turns 200 columns in SEPTA concourse into socially distant canvases," Philadelphia Inquirer.)

The concourse ("SEPTA to improve user experience in Center City’s underground concourses," WHYY/NPR) is so big that it screams out for other uses.  And without ordered uses, it was an area where the homeless camped out.  

In 2020, as a way to address this and as part of the transit agency's concourse improvement program, SEPTA commissioned the city's famed Mural Arts Program ("Mural Arts Philadelphia: Empowering Communities through Art," NEA) to paint the columns.  

Artist Lauren Cat West designed the project, called "Lovely Day," and artist Alvin Tull led the actual creation, managing the homeless as "artist assistants" to do the painting.  From the article:

The rows of columns were designed with geometric patterns by artist Lauren Cat West and painted by hundreds of people hired through Color Me Back, a program of Mural Arts Philadelphia that identifies people who are homeless or economically insecure, pays them $50 for a day’s labor, and offers them social services. 

Color Me Back is a component of Mural Arts’ Porchlight initiative, creating public art projects in partnership with the city’s Department of Behavioral Health and Intellectual disAbility Services. 

The job of training them how to paint two hundred concrete columns fell to artist Alvin Tull. He learned to assess each individual’s ability, sending some to paint background color. Others, more able to paint detail, were given more complex jobs.

As part of the city's Mural Arts Month, the mural will be officially unveiled (which couldn't be done during the peak of the pandemic) and tours will be held Monday-Thursday, from noon to 1 pm, by participants, from October 12th to November 18th.

There's a nice video, showing the finished product, with Alvin Tull.

======

Another interesting public art project at Walnut Station was in 2019, where for one month, all advertising was replaced with artworks ("An anti-advertising campaign of artwork takes over Philadelphia subway station," WHYY/NPR).

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, October 03, 2021

Transit systems, broken windows, and the burden of homelessness

Homeless people sleeping in the Powell Street Station, 2017.  Photo: Laura Oda, San Jose Mercury News.

A few weeks ago, I started writing a blog entry about how BART, the Bay Area Rapid Transit system, has created a "senior manager of social service partnerships" to deal with homelessness on the system ("Meet BART’s first-ever homelessness czar," San Jose Mercury News).  From the article:

As the entire state grapples with a homelessness crisis made worse by the COVID pandemic, BART is trying a new strategy to address the hundreds of unhoused people seeking refuge on its trains and in and around its stations. The transit agency is on the front lines, grappling with everything from people suffering mental health crises on BART platforms to encampment fires encroaching on tracks and disrupting train service. 

Now, BART is drafting a “Strategic Homeless Action Plan” to take a more proactive approach to the issue. The new initiative includes hiring 20 crisis intervention specialists, partnering with social service agencies to deliver resources to people in need, and improving the data BART collects on how the homelessness crisis impacts its system. ...

[From the interview]  "BART is reflective of the Bay Area, so homelessness is huge and we’re seeing hundreds and hundreds of unsheltered individuals every day. I think especially in light of the pandemic, with so many shelters closing and capacity being limited, BART has been the one constant that’s been open." 

Q: BART obviously is a transportation agency, not a human services or housing organization. So why is it BART’s responsibility to tackle the homelessness crisis?

A: I think it was just too much to ignore at a certain point. The status quo wasn’t working. There are still so many pressing issues that we’re experiencing, our staff is experiencing, and our riders are experiencing. And so as more people are getting on BART every day as we sort of hopefully put COVID in the back view, it’s really important for us to have a strategic plan and actions behind that to address some of these issues. We’re not going to be the social service entity ever. But we need to know how to move to be able to guide the resources to BART and our riders.

Similarly SEPTA has announced an increase in funding for services to deal with homelessness on their transit system, including the hiring of up to 57 outreach workers focusing on connecting homeless people to services and reducing their negative impacts ("SEPTA will spend $3.6 million to bulk up social services for homeless people and drug users," Philadelphia Inquirer).

These are attempts to make the transit system safer and more congenial for riders.

At first, I thought this was pretty amazing, but the reality is that it is a necessary response to the failure of other parts of society and government to take care of this, and it puts extra burden and costs, reflected in higher fares, on transit systems.

Relatedly, this week, Bay Area media report that in the last week there have been three overdose deaths on the BART system, two on trains, one in a station ("Troubling trend of suspected overdose deaths on the BART system," KTVU-TV/Fox).  

But rampant and visible drug use at BART stations is nothing new ("BART Officials Appalled by Video of Rampant Drug Use at Civic Center," KPIX-TV/CBS)

I have been reading Police Chief William Bratton's latest book, The Profession: A Memoir of Community, Race, and the Arc of Policing in America, and I am just up to the point where he is taking the job of Chief of the New York City Transit Police, in early 1990.  This was when the system was still in crisis, but with the people and finances capable of achieving a turnaround.

Transit wunderkind David Gunn was the chief of the Subway system, and during the interview process he took Bratton on a tour of trains, stations, and other infrastructure.  It was a mess of graffiti, litter and other trash, homeless, urine, crime, etc.

The point Gunn made was that they could fix the trains and get them operating on time and safely.  But if the stations and system remained disorderly and chaotic, it wouldn't matter.

Broken Windows theory of policing.  That really set the stage for Bratton and the adoption of the "Broken Windows" approach to addressing and reducing crime.  It gave me a lot of insight into his thinking.

I am a strong proponent of Broken Windows theory, which I argue hasn't really truly been adopted by police departments.  

The original theory, comparable to social urbanism, calls for a co-equal focus on improvements in policing -- how police time is used, more officers if possible, and the use of data on crime and types of crime to direct resources towards reducing crime not just responding to it, as well as investments to address disorderly conditions that contribute to community degradation, in urban design interventions focused on "crime prevention through community design," etc.

-- "The state of "broken windows" versus "problem oriented policing" strategies in 2016: Part 1, theory and practice"
-- "The state of "broken windows" versus "problem oriented policing" strategies in 2016: Part 2, what to do"
-- "Crime prevention through environmental design and repeated burglaries at the Naylor Gardens apartment complex," 2013
-- "Los Angeles police department "Community Safety Partnership"," 2014
-- "Night-time safety: rethinking lighting in the context of a walking community," 2014
-- "Crime time re-revisited: a set of programs focused on reducing crime," 2015
-- "The state of "broken windows" versus "problem oriented policing" strategies in 2016: Part 1, theory and practice," 2016
-- "The state of "broken windows" versus "problem oriented policing" strategies in 2016: Part 2, what to do," 2016
-- "Police response to mental health matters," 2016
-- "Who identifies problems and addresses them at the metropolitan scale? No one, at least when it comes to mental health-related police shootings," 2016
-- "Revisiting intimate partner violence/murder," 2017
-- "Seattle Times article on the need for changes to 911 services and emergency response," 2018
-- "Broken windows/collective efficacy: Baltimore; Newark; Grand Junction, Colorado; Pittsburgh; Albany," 2019
-- "Social urbanism and Baltimore," 2019

Zero Tolerance Policing is not the same as the Broken Windows approach.  Instead most police departments interpreted it as "zero tolerance policing," arresting people for the smallest of infractions.

And as crime rates dropped, ZTP not only had diminishing marginal returns, but led to reduced community support in the face of practices like "stop and frisk"  ("Crime dropped under stop-and-frisk, which is worth remembering in the rush to criticize it," NBC, Stop and Frisk: The Human Impact, Center for Constitutional Rights, "Here’s what you need to know about stop and frisk — and why the courts shut it down," Washington Post).

It also made "Broken Windows" a target for community activists and academics, since the theory was associated so closely with policing in New York City.

But having lived in a pretty bad area of DC for about 15 years, from the late 1980s to the early 2000s, I became a pretty strong proponent of the concept, having the "lived experience" of serious disorder and the many negative impacts from being victim of crime as a person and as a resident of a neighborhood ("The fine line between urban/center city chaos and order," 2020).

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, June 22, 2021

City and national politics, the rise in disorder and the Republican/Democratic narrative | Elections in Seattle and New York City

Last year I wrote about how the "defund the police" trope could be damaging to the Democratic Party's election prospects, in the same way that Nixon trumped Humphrey in 1968 ("Is it too late to change the messaging on "Defund the Police"? How about "Reconstruct Policing"?" -- although now I call for broadening the definition and delivery of "public safety" see "The opportunity to rearticulate public safety delivery keeps being presented").

People gathered along the area known as Methadone Mile in Boston.  Photo: Erin Clark.    From "How should Boston fix the ‘Mass. and Cass’ area?," Boston Globe.

And it's fair to say that while Trump was not successful in fully painting the Democrats as the party of disorder, there's no question that Democrat losses in the House and the failure to take the Senate were in part because of suburban voters being fed up with Trump, but not in all cases, Republicans ("How ‘Defund the Police’ Roiled Competitive Races in New York" and "Has New York Hit a Progressive Plateau? The Mayor’s Race Is a Key Test," New York Times, "Is defunding the police 'Obamacare 2.0'? Democrats face challenge with voters heading into 2022," USA Today).

Photo: Mark Piscotty, Getty Images.

The cities where we are seeing steps backward especially are Portland ("Portland leaders condemn ongoing violence by ‘anarchists’," AP), New York, San Francisco ("The 'little things' are turning San Francisco bad in a big way," The Hill, "How California Homelessness Became a Crisis," NPR), and Seattle ("Why does prosperous King County have a homelessness crisis?," McKinsey), 

Another place we are seeing that play out is in local elections this year in Seattle and New York City.  NYC's primary is today, but with ranked choice voting and many candidates it's hard to say who will win.  Seattle's primary is not until the first week of August.

In both elections, the rise in violent crime, especially murder (not unique to those cities, see "Murders Are Rising the Most in a Few Isolated Precincts of Major Cities," Wall Street Journal), and disorder associated with a significant rise in homelessness and people living on the streets is making it much harder for "progressive candidates" like Dianne Morales, who is especially hardcore compared to Maya Wiley, in New York and in Seattle ("Why 2021 might be the year of backlash in Seattle city elections," Crosscut).

And Republicans are working very hard to make rising crime the main argument against Democrats in the midterm elections next year ("Rising violent crime poses new challenge for White House," The Hill, "Biden launches an effort to head off violent crime — and political peril for his party," Washington Post).

In NYC, Eric Adams, Brooklyn Borough President and a former police officer, seems to be the leader, in part because of his police background, although it's possible as secondary votes are redistributed through the RCV process, he might not win.

Of course, Fox and similar media like the New York Post ("NYC progressives are going to lose the Dem primary to soaring crime") see this as all about crime and disorder. 

OTOH, they might be right, and what happens in these elections, and maybe the Boston mayoral race, where crime and disorder don't seem to be prime issues ("Boston's Historic Race For Mayor Matters To The Entire Region. Why Aren't More People Paying Attention?," WBUR/NPR), will give some clues to how the Democrats will have to position in the 2022 House and Senate elections.

======

Cities and disorder.  Granted, dealing with crime and homelessness is complicated.  But I vividly remember what DC was like in the late 1980s and throughout much of the 1990s and what it cost me personally and I would never want to return to those times.  

I have no problem with addressing crime, funding homeless services, and at the same time, broadening our definition of what public safety should be, how to fund it, and how to deliver it, while reversing the adoption by police departments of warrior policing, overpolicing and the crminalization of poverty and other social problems, which is thoroughly discussed in End of Policing.

While I agree with arguments about overpolicing and mass incarceration, at the same time, violent crime shouldn't be ignored, nor should disorder of various types including camping out in public spaces.

Seattle's CHOP/CHAZ certainly proved that expecting people to just all get along, not commit crimes, and self organize for security is "unrealistic" ("They envisioned a world without police. Inside Seattle's CHOP zone, protesters struggled to make it real," CNN, "What Really Happened in CHOP?," Seattle Met Magazine, "SEATTLE’S CHOP WENT OUT WITH BOTH A BANG AND A WHIMPER," The Intercept).

Somehow we need to strike a balance, but a kind of nullification of the recognition that disorder is not positive for cities, along the lines of Moynihan's "Defining Deviancy Down" is a move backward to urban decline, along the lines of what Fred Siegel wrote about in The Future Once Happened Here.  

People seem to have forgotten that it was significant improvements in public safety--for example DC's number of murders went from  482 in 1991 to 88 in 2012, but have since risen, to 198 last year--that helped to spur in-migration back into the cities, for example DC has added more than 100,000 new residents in the past 10 years. 

Siegel is considered conservative, but his book is very important.

In 2009, there was a column featuring an interview with Siegel in the Arizona Republic, called "3 Ways Cities Go Bad," and number one is disorder.  From the article:

Siegel believes there are three fundamental ways in which big cities go bad. The first is to lose control of order and civility in their public space - the streets, sidewalks and parks. This was an essential part of New York's deterioration and subsequent crime epidemic and the primary element of its recovery.

I told Siegel of a long walk my wife and I had taken from our hotel to Central Park and through Central Park to the Metropolitan Museum of Art, returning partially after nightfall. We felt not a moment of unease, were never panhandled and saw only three vagrants along the way. Siegel said such an excursion would have been unthinkable 15 years ago.

Even more remarkably, Siegel thinks this part of New York's recovery will endure. Previously, politicians dodged responsibility by saying that there was nothing that could practically be done to control the small acts of disorder and incivility - such as aggressive panhandling, public urination and a large presence of vagrants - that lead to a loss of control over public space and larger disorder that involves more serious crime.

This has been proved wrong and, according to Siegel, New Yorkers will not accept slippage among the politicians on this front.

In the book, he discusses "dependent individualism" and the "riot ideology."  The former I term "I can do whatever I want and you have to pay for it" and the latter as "if you don't give us x and y, we'll riot." 

The other two elements of failure according to Siegel are dominance of local politics by municipal unions and a decline in the private sector as a fundamental element of the local economy.  He calls this  the "entitlement economy," where opportunity is derived from politics and political decisions.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, April 14, 2021

President Biden's Infrastructure Program: Part 1: Homelessness

A few months back, I wrote "What should a domestic Marshall Plan/21st Century New Deal look like?," suggesting a bunch of sectors where focused federal government investment could make a big difference.  

Charlie commented that a key element of the New Deal was moving capital from Wall Street to the nation's interior, which was starved of investment capital in general.  This is a huge point.

So I have started reading some books on the New Deal, right now I'm reading The New Deal: A Modern History by LA Times journalist Michael Hiltzik, and The New Deal and the American West.  

There are plenty of journal and other articles as well, both old and new ("Learning From the New Deal—For the Next Recovery," Atlantic Monthly).

There is a lot of criticism of President Biden's proposed program ("Biden Details $2 Trillion Plan to Rebuild Infrastructure and Reshape the Economy," New York Times, "White House Issues State Infrastructure Grades," US News & World Report), and the planner in me would say that there needs to be more serious planning before moving forward, and innovation.

For example, I wrote a bunch of pieces after Obama was elected, suggesting reorganizing federal agencies to better address urban and rural development issues.

-- "How will Obama relate to the District?"

But reading about the New Deal and taking into account the reality of the Republican response to government generally and Democratic proposals specifically: in effect -- "Can't do.  Won't do.  F*** you" -- it's not possible to do this kind of planning because all it does is provide more time for the opposition to organize.

In such cases, planning makes it easier to stymie.  See various writings on the concept of "vetocracy", e.g., "A few steps to overcome American 'vetocracy"," San Francisco Chronicle.

(Which is tragic because it makes it difficult to develop the necessary support base to help ensure ultimate success for the program.)

And sadly, the way that government works now, it's so hard to create a program to begin with, that there isn't the concept that programs can be improved over time, with experience, because it's almost impossible to get enough votes for a "technical modifications" bill.

The process is very bad.

The Interstate Highway System as a counter example.  By contrast, the process by which the federal government "created" the Interstate Highway system took more than 20 years, and it wasn't because of President Eisenhower's experience as a young military officer.

First, there was the development of technical ideas and a campaign for the idea of highways, in part spurred on by the example of Germany.  For example I have a copy of an issue of Fortune Magazine from 1936, with graphics showing how freeways can be designed.

Second, building on such efforts, and Congressional mandates, in 1939, the Bureau of Public Roads released a plan, Toll Roads and Free Roads, for the Interstate Highway System.

Third, in 1944, Congress authorized but did not appropriate funding for the proposed system subsequently refined (Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1944).

Fourth, in 1956, Congress appropriated money to build the system ("Congress Approves the Federal Highway Act," US Senate), recognizing that in those 12 years between authorization and appropriation of funds there was plenty of organizing and lobbying ("Origins of the Interstate System," FHWA).

And this doesn't even count the 25 or so years it took to build the bulk of that system, and funding its maintenance, which is an issue now, both with the failure to increase gasoline excise taxes very much, the effect of inflation on maintenance, funding new projects, and the transition from fossil fuel powered motor vehicles to electric vehicles that don't pay excise taxes on motor fuels.

Biden doesn't have 20+ years to pass an infrastructure bill.  At most he might only have two years.

=====================

Homelessness and affordable housing as infrastructure.  So, WRT "homelessness," last week a HUD press release stated that "HUD ANNOUNCES $5 BILLION TO INCREASE AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO ADDRESS HOMELESSNESS."

But for me, speaking of planning, it sounds more like "same old, same old."  This is the downside of not being able to plan, and having to develop consensus on what to do, when so many different interests have such vastly different opinions and approaches to dealing with the problem.

One key element that is needed is a massive program to build single room occupancy housing in major metropolitan areas, ideally in places with high quality transportation.  At the very least, most major cities need thousands of units of this type of housing, not a few dozen or even hundreds of units,  but thousands.

-- "One of the "solutions" to the crisis of homelessness is a lot more SRO housing," 2017
-- "Another example of the need for social housing organizations to construct social housing at scale," 2019

Granted, I often criticize people for believing the solution to complicated problems is "this one thing."  

I don't believe that building SRO housing is "the one solution that will end homelessness," but lack of such housing, at scale, is a significant reason we have the problem we have.

For the most part, post-war housing and zoning policies made such housing illegal.  Without the right type of housing for a significant segment of the homeless population, obviously it becomes a serious problem.

It will only get worse, because housing will only get more expensive, making it that much more difficult for people on society's margins to be able to get and pay for housing without extranormal public support.

But note, it's not cheap.  

For example, the 148 unit Mark Twain Hotel in Chicago cost $23 million to buy and $20 million to renovate, and ongoing operating subsidies because most of the tenants are extremely low income ("Iconic Mark Twain Hotel Converting to Affordable Housing in Chicago's Gold Coast Historic District," Multifamilybiz, "After nearly $20 million facelift, Near North Side SRO unveiled as affordable housing ‘done right’" Chicago Sun-Times). 

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, August 27, 2020

Creating 'community safety partnership neighborhood management programs as a management and mitigation strategy for public nuisances: Part 3 (like homeless shelters)

A couple weeks ago, there were two separate articles ("SLC park has become 'nightmare' with dangerous crime, neighbors say" and "SLC businesses fed up with crime near homeless resource center," Fox13-TV) about the negative impacts on neighborhoods and commercial districts adjacent to new facilities serving Salt Lake County's homeless population.

There's a lot of break ins, assaults, and various other crimes.

It got me thinking.

Why not accompany "noxious uses" like homeless shelters with a "Community Safety Partnership" to provide extra safety and nuisance abatement services to the areas likely to be impacted by the placement?

This idea extends the discussion in the current series on creating more focused neighborhood stabilization initiatives.

-- "The need for a "national" neighborhood stabilization program comparable to the Main Street program for commercial districts: Part I (Overall)"
-- "To be successful, local neighborhood stabilization programs need a packaged set of robust remedies: Part 2"
-- "Creating 'community safety partnership neighborhood management programs as a management and mitigation strategy for public nuisance programs: Part 3 (like homeless shelters)"
-- "A case in Gloucester, Massachusetts as an illustration of the need for systematic neighborhood monitoring and stabilization initiatives: Part 4 (the Curcuru Family)"
-- "Local neighborhood stabilization programs: Part 5 | Adding energy conservation programs, with the PUSH Buffalo Green Development Zone as a model," 2021
 
Public safety versus policing.  In the post-George Floyd environment, there's been a lot of discussion about the difference between policing and public safety, calls to "defund the police," and renewed interest in alternative approaches, such as that discussed in the book by Alex Vitale, The End of Policing, where he makes the point that many social problems where we deploy police would be better addressed through alternatives to police officers.

And there has been attention brought to the CAHOOTS program in Eugene and Springfield, Oregon, which uses a team of social workers and other emergency personnel, but not police, as first responders originally to mental health-related issues ("'CAHOOTS': How Social Workers And Police Share Responsibilities In Eugene, Oregon," NPR) but which has been expanded to include:
"homelessness, intoxication, disorientation, substance abuse and ... dispute resolution. Non-emergency medical care, first aid, and transportation to services is also provided."
From "SLC park has become 'nightmare' with dangerous crime, neighbors say":
The community park was bustling... for all the wrong reasons, if you ask the people who live next to it.  "Lots of homelessness, lots of drug use, and lots of drug dealing," said Matt Engle, who can see the park from his home.

He and another neighbor explained they frequently see drug deals, and drug overdoses. They'll find needles next to human feces. The trash bins were overflowing on Wednesday, with more garbage littering the ground. ...

Part of the reason they think Jefferson Park has become a hot spot for criminal activity, is the location within the Ballpark area. It sits in between the two new homeless resource centers, which each opened within the last year.
The second SLC article is about similar and worse problems experienced by businesses located near one of the new homeless shelters, including assaults, drug use, prostitution, break ins, and outdoor defecation. 

WRT both situations, the city does have action teams that work with communities impacted by homeless shelters.  But the response or the way that the program is set up to work appears to be inadequate.

Salt Lake's homeless facilities used to be concentrated in the Rio Grande district Downtown, and they got out of hand in terms of drug dealing and violence.  In response, the city, county, State, and other stakeholders came together and created a program to relocate the facilities, to make them smaller and to not put them all in one place, not unlike how DC has distributed homeless family facilities around the city.

Like my criticisms of the DC response the program may have been built on some flawed decisions resulting from incorrect assessment of the issues.  They built three facilities, but reduced overall capacity, so that the problem of homeless people living on the street persists.  The facilities were full soon after they opened, before winter even set in, and Salt Lake City had to create an emergency shelter.

The plans reduced capacity on the assumption they could reduce homelessness with new service programs, but as I say the problem of homelessness is more like a river than a lake--the population isn't fixed and continually grows depending on social and economic conditions, just as a river isn't a still body of water, whereas lakes are more contained bodies of water.

In any case, creating substantive reduction in need on such a short time line was overly ambitious and likely to fail (which it did).

(Jeremy Harmon | The Salt Lake Tribune) Josh Valdez talks about his experience camping in Salt Lake City during the COVID-19 pandemic on Thursday, Aug. 13, 2020.

And while the deconcentration has removed most of the problems that had existed in the Rio Grande area, in some respects they've merely been displaced, both in other areas of downtown, which has a lot of homeless camping and congregating and to the areas around the new shelters.

In part this is abetted by how the pandemic has led to the closure of public facilities like libraries ("Have Salt Lake City homeless encampments gotten out of control again?" and "Business, public building closures leave Salt Lake City’s homeless with few places to use restrooms," Salt Lake Tribune).

Social service programs and resident opposition to their placement.  Over the decades there's been tons of media coverage of homeless shelters ("Homeless shelter opponents are using this environmental law in bid to block new housing," Los Angeles Times) and drug rehabilitation clinics ("Many residents oppose proposed Monument methadone clinic," Colorado Springs Gazette) as nuisances, among others.

Residents complain about the deleterious impacts on their neighborhoods, because of misbehavior and criminal activity by some of the clients of these facilities.

From "‘Not-in-my-backyard’ arguments ramp up against proposed Center for Health & Housing," Springfield State Journal-Register.  Photo: Ted Schurter.

The response to opposition is attempts at  shaming, that the residents are nimbys and unwilling to bear some of the burden associated with dealing with social problems ("Is Shame The Antidote To NIMBYism In The Washington Region?," WAMU/NPR).

The reality is that not all nimbyism is the same.

Even if most don't, some uses do generate extranormal negative effects. And typically, programs aren't set up to deal with these known and likely effects. Which generates even more nimbyism going forward.

Usually plans to address the known spillover nuisances from potentially noxious uses aren't required.  In the vein of "public safety" vs. policing, I think the problem is both simpler and more complicated.  The issue isn't an unwillingness of residents to bear the burden (although some will remain opposed in any instance), but simultaneously mitigating the potential for problems that arise with the placement of such uses.

It should be no different from taverns, nightclubs (Best Safety Practices for Nightlife Establishments, City of West Hollywood; "Nightclub and Bar Security: Bouncers, Doormen and Security Guards | You Are Security! " LPT Security Consultants), gas stations ("Creating a Safer Gas Station for Your Customers and Employees, Ovation Insurance) and convenience stores ("Are You Doing Enough to Secure Your Stores?," Convenience Store News) creating security plans, knowing that these types of uses (and others) are known to have a higher propensity for criminal activity.

-- Center for Problem-Oriented Policing, Arizona State University
-- "Tampa Bay Times investigation on the cost of emergency services associated with Walmart stores," 2016

My experience living around the corner from the Peirce Shelter in DC: itinerant service vs. structure and management.  The descriptions by SLC residents and business owners reminded me of my DC experience, when I lived on the same block as a big emergency shelter in the H Street neighborhood.  Emergency shelters provide a bed at night and breakfast, but then they kick people out during the day.  With nowhere to go, no place to store their belongings, etc., people tend to loiter, and often conduct and handle their life business out in the street, and there are crimes associated with  daytime activities.

The shelter was a scourge on the neighborhood, contributing to poor quality of life.  Just like in the Rio Grande area of Salt Lake City.

BUT THEN, it was converted from an emergency shelter to a facility as part of a three-phase system of addiction care and rehabilitation.  Instead of kicking people out every day, they stayed in, working on their program requirements.

Basically, the served population went from unmanaged to managed, and this had a massive positive impact on quality of life in the neighborhood at large.  Except for occasional ambulances at the shelter, and weekend car washes held there to raise funds for the clients, you wouldn't have known that they were there.

My lesson from this is that the problem with shelters is lack of management and throwing people out onto the streets during the day.

Plus not providing any programs and services aiming at interdicting and addressing the problems that come up during the day in the surrounding neighborhood as a result of putting people out early in the morning.

A "community safety partnership" approach to mitigating problems from homeless shelters and related uses.  As standard practice, why not accompany "noxious uses" like homeless shelters with a "Community Safety Partnership" to provide extra safety and nuisance abatement services to the areas likely to be impacted by the placement?  This idea extends the discussion in the two previous pieces on creating more focused neighborhood stabilization initiatives.


Community safety partnership =
police + neighborhood support workers + mental health personnel + social workers + other services


31.Before.WTPM.WDC.21September2019BID maintenance worker/ambassador, Downtown DC BID.

Besides how business improvement districts have cleaning programs and "ambassadors" to monitor public space and some even have social workers on staff to deal with homeless issues, other models to draw upon are the Los Angeles Community Safety Partnership ("After Years Of Violence, L.A.'s Watts Sees Crime Subside," NPR and "What Does It Take to Stop Crips and Bloods From Killing Each Other," New York Times), the "neighborhood warden" approach in England and Wales (Neighbourhood wardens: the activity pattern in one English city and Neighbourhood wardens: a review of international experience, LSE), and the CAHOOTS program, which is non-police-based crisis response for non-emergency calls.

From "Meet the neighbourhood wardens who are the 'eyes and ears' of Gedling's streets," Nottinghamshire Post. Photo by Joseph Raymor.

In The End of Policing's chapter on dealing with homelessness, Professor Vitale discusses the need for drop in centers alongside emergency shelter, with caseworkers, mental health services, counseling, practical amenities like mail drops, health care, food, and clothing.  

These types of services need to be part of a Community Safety Partnership program.  I know that some of these kinds of services are being provided as part of the new homeless service model in Salt Lake County, but I don't know about the depth or breadth of the program.

The programs mentioned are Bread & Jams in Cambridge, Massachusetts, which sadly is defunct  because of changes in homeless policy for services and redirection of funds ("Pantry’s Closure Will Leave Void in Harvard Square Daytime Homeless Services," Harvard Crimson), and Mission Neighborhood Resource Center in San Francisco.  B&J provided help with housing and job search, benefits advocacy, health care and policy advocacy.  MNRC provides showers, services, and outreach teams that work without police.


(In this piece, "One potential solution to the problem of "finding work" for homeless adults," I suggest creating supported job programs for homeless adults.)

Jared Arvanitas, manager for the Downtown Alliance's ambassador program, checks to see if Emil Miller and his dog, Tehya, need anything outside City Creek Center in Salt Lake City.  Photo: Streets Plus.
The goal of the Downtown Ambassador Program is to create an even more welcoming and safe city center for residents and visitors, as well as providing additional outreach efforts for people experiencing homelessness, said Steve Hillard, president of Streets Plus, a national company that specializes in providing ambassador services in several major cities. 

 "We hire licensed social service workers to serve as ambassadors, so on the street, we engage those in need, we do case management, refer them to appropriate services and talk to them every day," he said. 

"It's a very 'down to earth' networking (approach) to build relationships with (people in need) so that when the time comes and they're ready to make a move to get a meal, get clothing or get a job, in-patient services or housing, we're there to facilitate that process." 

Hillard said the program is geared toward "inclusivity" where people in the community feel a part of trying to make the downtown area welcoming to everyone. He noted that in Chicago, the program drew thousands of referrals and helped get 57 people off the streets and into a better living environments in its first year of operation. 

"We're talking jobs, in-patient services, treatment, housing and thousands of referrals for food, clothing and medical services," Hillard said. "We expect that we can do the same thing here in Salt Lake."
Neighborhood wardens are an initiative created by the Blair Government in the UK.  Basically, along the lines of the two previous posts on creating focused neighborhood improvement and stabilization initiatives in weak market neighborhoods, but in response to conditions created by conversion to private management of large housing estates in English cities.

Neighborhood wardens are what we might call quality of life managers, assigned to cover a particular area or "patch."  They address low level nuisances (litter, dumping, graffiti, etc.) and certain matters of "anti-social behavior").  "Their duties vary, but can include patrolling, cleaning and maintaining public areas, organising youth programmes, and liaising with police."
Top objectives of neighborhood warden schemes in the UK
In a paper on the program, the authors define four approaches, including "patrollers" and "neighborhood support workers."  Wardens don't have police powers, they usually wear uniforms, and in some situations, they are authorized to write tickets and fine notices for certain types of infractions.

32.ConnecticutAvenue.NW.WDC.10November2013
Bike-based ambassador/patroller in DC's Golden Triangle BID.

Los Angeles Community Safety Partnership. Spurred by the Advancement Project advocacy organization (The LAPD Community Safety Partnership: an experiment in policing, USC masters thesis), in 2011, the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles and the police department implemented a community-engaged policing strategy in four public housing communities in the Watts neighborhood: Nickerson Gardens; Imperial Courts; Jordan Downs; and Ramona Gardens.

The Watts neighborhood has the greatest concentration of public housing in the city and each development had been marked by deep-rooted gang problems, drug sales, and rampant crime.

The point of the CSP was to try something different from brute force policing--which had been the agency's primary method before--focusing on rebuilding the relationship of the police department with the community, because ultimately the safest communities police themselves.

Repositioning the relationship between the community and the police department and their role in public safety comes in part through youth participation on the football and track teams and how this reconstructs relationships between police officers, children, and their families.

While the CSP doesn't focus on arresting people, police officers will do so depending on the circumstances. In the three years previous to the launch of CSP, there were an average of 23 murders per year in the designated area. 

For two years after the program started, there were no murders. In the third year, there were two murders, but the perpetrators were quickly apprehended within days due in large part to information provided by the community.

Earlier this year the program was expanded2019 Program Assessment ("LAPD community policing program has prevented crime and made residents feel safer, study finds," Los Angeles Times).

Create Community Safety Partnerships/Neighborhood Stabilization Program for areas with homeless shelters, drug rehabilitation clinics, and other potentially noxious but legal and necessary uses.

Community safety partnership =
police + neighborhood support workers + mental health personnel + social workers + other services


Places where homeless shelters and similar kinds of uses are situated, like the Ballpark District and other areas in Salt Lake County, should be accompanied by the creation and operation of focused and ongoing neighborhood stabilization initiatives that are a combination carrot and stick, to foster order maintenance, to reduce problems typically associated with such facilities.

The inclusion of policing can be a necessary element, when serious crimes (assault, break ins, etc.) are part of the mix.  As Megan McArdle writes in a recent column ("Videos of Portland protesters show a complicated relationship with police and policing"):
“At some point,” says Peter Moskos of New York’s John Jay College of Criminal Justice, “society needs to accept that there is an element of repression — social control — in policing. At some point there are people who need to be policed.”
From "Judge rejects challenge to Venice homeless shelter," Los Angeles Times.  Photo: Mel Melcon.

(And yes, overconcentration of service facilities in particular areas can be a legitimate issue.)

Appointed and elected officials need to recognize that some concerns expressed by opponents to shelters and similar kinds of uses can be legitimate.

The point shouldn't be to shut down and shame people when they raise such issues.  It should be to address them.  Community Safety Partnerships are the way to respond proactively.

Salt Lake City as a great candidate for launching an Elm Street neighborhood stabilization initiative.  Note that based on other reporting ("Four homicides in one year have Ballpark neighbors calling for action" and "New study shows Glendale and Rose Park hit hardest by COVID-19," Salt Lake Tribune) Salt Lake City would probably be a good candidate for adoption of the "Elm Street" neighborhood stabilization model I outlined in the first two parts of this article series.  For deployment in multiple neighborhoods.

Conclusion: Create a Community Safety Partnership for Salt Lake City's Ballpark District. And the Ballpark neighborhood ought to be a top priority for the creation of a Community Safety Partnership type program.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,